Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Web Security Appliance Logo

Cisco Web Security Appliance Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
3.9 out of 5

What is Cisco Web Security Appliance?

Featured Cisco Web Security Appliance reviews

Cisco Web Security Appliance mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Cisco Web Security Appliance in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category stands at 1.8%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco Web Security Appliance1.8%
Cisco Umbrella12.8%
Zscaler Internet Access12.1%
Other73.3%
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Web Security Appliance reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySecure Web Gateways (SWG)Mar 28, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Web Security Appliance vs Cisco UmbrellaMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Web Security Appliance vs Fortinet FortiGateMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Web Security Appliance vs Zscaler Internet AccessMar 28, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Fortinet FortiGate4.26.9%92%587 interviewsAdd to research
iboss4.22.5%94%19 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business50
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise93
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Construction Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Media Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
University
3%
Non Profit
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Retailer
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
International Affairs Institute
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare Cisco Web Security Appliance with alternative products

Learn more about Cisco Web Security Appliance

Cisco Web Security Appliance customers

Related questions

 
Cisco Web Security Appliance Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior IP Network Defense at MTN4.5We use Cisco Web Security Appliance for cost-effective web security, particularly for remote workers, while finding some integration challenges. Despite minimal investment, it strengthens protection layers against breaches. Previously, we experienced DDoS issues with Cisco's other solutions.
Security Solution Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees3.5I use Cisco Web Security Appliance for malware protection, URL filtering, and DLP. I appreciate its advanced threat analytics, though integrating policies with BYOD can be challenging. Despite this, it outperforms alternatives like BlueCards in market competitiveness.
Deputy Manager Infra & Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We use Cisco Web Security Appliance as a proxy for secure internet browsing, appreciating its frequent updates and valuable features like malware protection. We previously used Trend Micro but switched due to Cisco's enhanced security. Cloud migration is planned.
Head of Integration Engineering / Enterprise Technology & Innovation at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees4.0We used the Cisco Web Security Appliance for security and proxy functions, appreciating its flexibility in applying policies. Although its reporting needs improvement, it was a worthy investment compared to our previous solution, Websense.
IT specialist at Východoslovenský ústav srdcových a cievnych chorôb, a.s.3.5I use Cisco Web Security Appliance for proxy purposes in my company. Its security features are valuable, protecting users from insecure websites. However, management capabilities need improvement. I rate the ROI high and considered alternatives like GFI KerioControl and Fortinet FortiProxy.
L2 - Network Engineer at Sitel Group (previously Sykes)3.0We use Cisco Web Security Appliance as a forward proxy for filtering web requests, appreciating its security benefits and easy integration. However, the lack of a GUI-based troubleshooting feature makes diagnosing issues more difficult than with other vendors.
Unit Head System Administration & Automation at MCB Islamic Bank Ltd4.5Having used this solution for five years, I find it stable, scalable, and easy for internal internet access control. While I appreciate its features, I'd like user-based quotas and live graphs. I highly recommend it.
Network Security Consultant at NSCON Network Services & Consulting GmbH4.5I found this solution stable, effective for proxying with SSL decryption, and easy to set up. However, its on-premise nature limits scalability for scattered sites, and it lacks full firewall capabilities.