Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Site Recovery Logo

Azure Site Recovery Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
Start review

What is Azure Site Recovery?

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Get the Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery, Commvault Cloud, VMware Live Recovery and more!
Azure Site Recovery is the #2 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery as a Service providers. PeerSpot users give Azure Site Recovery an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Azure Site Recovery is most commonly compared to Commvault Cloud: Azure Site Recovery vs Commvault Cloud. Azure Site Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 59% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Azure Site Recovery
May 2025
Get the report
Helped 853,271 peers since 2012

Featured Azure Site Recovery reviews

Read more reviews

Azure Site Recovery mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category stands at 23.9%, down from 24.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery as a Service

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Site Recovery reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryDisaster Recovery as a ServiceMay 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 28, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Site Recovery vs VMware Live RecoveryMay 28, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Site Recovery vs Commvault CloudMay 28, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a ServiceMay 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Commvault Cloud4.312.3%95%110 interviewsAdd to research
VMware Live Recovery4.125.3%88%80 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Azure Site Recovery offers features such as seamless failover, fast environment snapshots, user-friendly interface, scalability, cost-effectiveness, secure and reliable performance, and comprehensive reporting and dashboards. Its automated file synchronization and load balancing are game-changers for managing legacy systems. The ease of migration and synchronization support for VMs make Azure Site Recovery popular among entities, enabled by its native integration with Azure services and automation for enhanced data consistency and recovery efficiency.
  • "The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."
  • "Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is obviously a time-saving solution, and I can write PowerShell scripts to automate failover on or off processes."

Room for Improvement

Azure Site Recovery needs better error logging and pricing adjustments. Users desire improvements in security features, hypervisor integration, and support speed. The service should enhance synchronization, versioning, patch management, and clearer billing. Real-time scanning, stability, multi-location replication, ease of use, and advanced automation are also sought after. Compatibility with more operating systems and platforms, as well as predictability in usage costs, would increase satisfaction among users.
  • "The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."
  • "There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages."
  • "Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services."

ROI

Azure Site Recovery delivers a favorable return as it simplifies processes and enhances reliability. It outperforms alternatives by saving time and reducing the need for additional infrastructure. Automating tasks allows businesses to save significant resources and time in backup and restoration. Despite being costlier than some services, Azure Site Recovery's service level justifies its price. Some smaller companies use it as a precautionary measure without calculating specific returns.

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery's pricing varies based on factors like storage, network traffic, and resource usage. Many users find it reasonably priced but suggest simplifying its component-based licensing. Monthly costs are often cited, with some users paying about $225 for site-to-site replication. Opinions on affordability are mixed, with some viewing it as affordable and others as costly for extensive setups. Microsoft's frequent pricing restructuring can pose challenges for accurately estimating costs, requiring adjustments to packages and subscriptions.
  • "The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Azure Site Recovery primarily for disaster recovery and business continuity. Many companies rely on it for backing up and replicating on-premises data to Azure, ensuring critical systems can be restored in the event of failures. Additionally, it's utilized for data migrations, compliance, testing, and maintaining uptime. Various sectors, including healthcare and insurance, benefit from its functionalities for seamless operations and minimizing downtime during disruptions.

Service and Support

Azure Site Recovery customer support is varied. Many find the support helpful and efficient, while others feel response times are long and communication lacks professionalism. Some rate support high, praising quick resolutions and expert assistance, especially when partners are involved. However, non-partner users experience a cumbersome ticket process. Technical support ratings range widely, highlighting inconsistency. Several report that Microsoft support is inadequate, with slow resolutions and failures in delivering expertise on complex issues.

Deployment

Azure Site Recovery's initial setup is straightforward for many users, though experience and infrastructure can influence complexity. While some found it easy, especially with a familiar user interface, others experienced challenges with documentation and hardware requirements. Deployment duration varied, with smaller environments completing in hours and larger setups requiring days or months for synchronization. Adequate expertise and team involvement proved beneficial, with many valuing additional vendor support and prior cloud experience.

Scalability

Azure Site Recovery is highly scalable. Users appreciate its flexibility for both small and large enterprises. While some see room for improvement, many note its effectiveness without size limitations and rate it between seven to ten out of ten. Whether managing a few servers or many, Azure Site Recovery supports diverse needs, from disaster recovery to seamless failover testing. The number of users can range from a handful to several hundred within organizations.

Stability

Many users consider Azure Site Recovery stable, frequently rating its reliability between seven to ten out of ten. Some report infrequent issues or situational instability, yet others experienced consistently high stability during multiple tests. They highlight no major crashes, bugs, or glitches, acknowledging its efficacy while noting potential difficulties in transitioning from existing systems. Its capability to function without downtime is frequently praised, making it a dependable choice for many organizations.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
University
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Government
4%
Media Company
4%
Retailer
3%
Construction Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Agriculture
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%

Compare Azure Site Recovery with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Azure Site Recovery

Azure Site Recovery customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Related questions

  • 79
Why is disaster recovery important?
  • 166
Can you recommend a disaster recovery automation tool?
  • 210
What is the difference between cyber resilience and business continuity?
  • 6
When should an enterprise choose a Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) solution?
  • 18
Which device do you recommend to use for traffic shaping & bandwidth optimization between P2P links?
  • 1
When evaluating Disaster Recovery as a Service, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 1
Why is Disaster Recovery as a Service important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery
VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery
Druva Phoenix vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Druva Phoenix vs Azure Site Recovery
IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery
See all alternatives
 

Azure Site Recovery reviews

Sort by:
JN
Client Relationship Manager at Infomag
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Mar 4, 2025
Ensures uninterrupted backup with minor patch management improvements required

Pros

"Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages."

What is our primary use case?

I work as a System Integrator and Microsoft partner. I use Azure Site Recovery as part of our organization's disaster recovery plan to manage customers' data backup and recovery.

What is most valuable?

Azure provides a 99.99% SLA for their uptime, ensuring that even during outages due to patch releases, there is no data loss, merely hindered accessibility. The standard backup and release within the environment, along with optional extended backup to different regions, enhance backup reinforcement based on data sensitivity and criticality.
*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Read full review (575 words)
PeerSpot user
Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Apr 24, 2025
Reliable recovery ensures uptime but communication and support need improvement

Pros

"The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."

Cons

"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

What is our primary use case?

Our organization used Azure Site Recovery because we could not afford for our site to be down for a long time. We hosted our core client-facing and advisor-facing engine on it. It was crucial for us to maintain uptime, so we conducted regular drills to ensure we could recover the site if it failed.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery. These aspects were crucial in ensuring that our client-facing and advisor-facing engine could be quickly restored during any downtime. The solution's ability to reliably handle these essential functions contributed to its effectiveness for our needs.
*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Read full review (523 words)
Buyer's Guide
Azure Site Recovery
Download free report
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery. Updated May 2025
853,271 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RituparnaBhattacharya - PeerSpot user
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Nov 27, 2024
The time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes

Pros

"The setup is quite easy, just requiring the creation of a vault."

Cons

"Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options."

What is our primary use case?

We migrated around seventy on-prem servers to Azure via Site Recovery for one of our projects. We use it in our disaster recovery site, and we perform this process every three months.

How has it helped my organization?

Azure Site Recovery is obviously a time-saving solution, and I can write PowerShell scripts to automate failover on or off processes.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (449 words)
Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot user
Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Feb 4, 2024
Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time

Pros

"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."

Cons

"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."

What is our primary use case?

In my company, I use the solution as a simple tool for backup and not for restoration purposes. My company is in the phase of conducting some simple and quick testing.

What is most valuable?

The ease of synchronization in Azure Site Recovery is a valuable feature. Azure Site Recovery's ability to ensure synchronization of VMs from on-premises to the cloud is something that Veeam doesn't do well, and it is one of the major factors that drove us towards the tool.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (578 words)
YO
IT infrastructure and services at United Bank for Africa
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
May 16, 2024
Useful for business continuity purposes but improvement is needed in replication and failover processes

Pros

"We use the tool for business continuity purposes. "

Cons

"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline. "

What is our primary use case?

We use the tool for business continuity purposes. 

What needs improvement?

The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline. 

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (336 words)
Peter Maklin Aquino - PeerSpot user
Project manager at Lapanday Foods Corporation
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Dec 3, 2023
Extremely stable and reliable

Pros

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems. "

Cons

"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing. "

What is most valuable?

Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems. Setting up the sync was easy, and when disaster recovery was triggered, ASR automatically ensured seamless replication of files from the primary to the secondary server. With just a click, this feature simplified and expedited the entire process, providing a reliable solution for maintaining data consistency between servers during recovery events.

What needs improvement?

The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing. While the service is efficient and successful in handling recovery scenarios, especially for large companies dealing with substantial monthly data, the costs can be a significant consideration. The ease and speed of ASR in recovery are commendable, but addressing the pricing aspect would enhance overall satisfaction.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (563 words)
Rafael Veloso - PeerSpot user
Consultant at SoftwareONE
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Jul 22, 2024
Ensures continuity and enables a robust disaster recovery plan

Pros

"You can create automation to move workloads and redirect traffic to another region."

Cons

"we lack a straightforward method to automate the restart of services, which can be quite time-consuming."

What is our primary use case?

When you have a large environment with applications and site databases structured in layers such as program, business layer, and database layer, it is crucial to have a secondary strategy in place. This involves running a secondary site in a different location, possibly in another country within the same region, ensuring continuity and enabling a robust disaster recovery plan to address any issues that may arise.

What is most valuable?

If you enable automated failover through the portal, in case of a disaster in your main site, you can create automation to move workloads and redirect traffic to another region. This ensures that you have a last line of defense for your secondary site in the event of any issues.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Read full review (636 words)
Rajesh Patel Patel - PeerSpot user
Technical Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of Azure Site Recovery
Apr 3, 2023
Good scalability but requires more time to sync with additional servers

Pros

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR). "

Cons

"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR). We have an infrastructure in Azure and we want to be able to spin up critical infrastructure in case of failures. We have not yet tested this in the cloud, but we have created a backup plan to ensure we are prepared for any potential failures.

What is most valuable?

For enterprise-level use, it is pretty good. However, for smaller customers, it can be a bit expensive compared to other solutions in the market. Personally, I prefer using Azure Migrate, as it is more cost-effective for smaller-scale use cases.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Read full review (422 words)