Azure Container Registry Reviews

Azure Container Registry brings significant value in terms of operational efficiency, high availability, and horizontal scaling. It helps save up to 92% on repository costs, though its ROI compared to JFrog Artifactory is debated. Some users don't find specific value due to similar functionality with existing solutions but find it necessary due to organizational constraints. Users have also gained exposure and learning in this technology while having their expenses covered by clients.

Azure Container Registry is perceived as reasonably priced, with flexibility in pricing plans. Users can choose between Basic, Standard, and Premium options, paying largely for storage. While some consider the enterprise license costly, others find the solution financially manageable and competitively priced. Typical costs are reported around $1.66 per day per region, translating to roughly $50 monthly. Multiple users appreciate the pricing structure, indicating a balance between cost and valued features.

• "I would rate the pricing four out of ten."
• "The product is competitively priced."
• "When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."

Organizations primarily use Azure Container Registry for storing and managing Docker images. They utilize it for containerizing applications, deploying via pipelines, and enabling applications on the cloud. It allows automated processes like CI/CD and facilitates microservices architecture by offering secure and efficient image storage. Azure Container Registry helps to maintain consistency in deployments across various environments, supporting diverse industries like logistics, healthcare, and technology with its easy integration and global reach.

Azure Container Registry support receives mixed feedback. Users rate technical assistance highly when provided directly by Microsoft but note dissatisfaction with outsourced partners. Some find support responsive and helpful, while others experience delays without a support plan, relying on forums instead. Several users haven't needed to contact support, considering documentation adequate. Microsoft receives varying ratings, with some satisfied by their service and others noting inconsistency. Support plans significantly impact user experiences.

Azure Container Registry's initial setup experiences varied. Some users found it straightforward and quick, citing ease of implementation and integration with existing environments. However, others encountered complexity, noting time-intensive processes, especially transitioning from other container registries. While some required extensive learning before deployment, several users praised its accessibility and seamless setup within Azure's ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for those seeking secure image storage without extensive maintenance. Deployment times differed based on regional factors and infrastructure.

Azure Container Registry is highly scalable, with flexibility in tiers and easy expansion through both standard portal components and infrastructure as code. Users report seamless storage and scaling abilities, supporting numerous repositories and diverse operational needs. Scaling involves minimal effort, enabling quick deployment and growth across departments. Multiple users access with no issues, supporting vertical scaling and high availability. Users rate scalability between eight to ten, emphasizing its capability to handle extensive workloads efficiently.

Azure Container Registry is generally ranked highly for stability, with consistent performance and built-in resiliency. Users report no significant issues, citing integration with security features and efficient control. Some experience occasional downtimes, yet many rate stability between eight and ten out of ten. However, a few mention indexing crashes or other challenges, with mixed experiences over time. The consensus among users highlights it as fundamentally stable and reliable.