AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Control Tower | 1.3% |
| VMware Aria Automation | 9.5% |
| Morpheus | 7.6% |
| Other | 81.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud Management | Oct 5, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Oct 5, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | AWS Control Tower vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) | Oct 5, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | AWS Control Tower vs VMware Aria Automation | Oct 5, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | AWS Control Tower vs VMware Aria Operations | Oct 5, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware Aria Automation | 4.0 | 9.5% | 94% | 171 interviewsAdd to research |
| Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure | 4.0 | 2.0% | 88% | 31 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Head of Platform Engineering at Ascend Group Co., Ltd. | 3.5 | I used AWS Control Tower for centralized governance and security across subsidiaries, but found it too complex and costly for smaller teams. It's scalable and effective for larger organizations, though it requires a steep learning curve. |
| Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group | 5.0 | I use AWS Control Tower primarily for managing security within my AWS organization, particularly for child accounts. It offers valuable features for security management, though I find the manual sync process cumbersome and would prefer automatic synchronization. |
| Managing Partner at Kloia | 4.0 | AWS Control Tower consistently enhances innovation with its new service features, offering exceptional reliability and user-friendliness. However, its limitation of supporting only one Control Tower per organization is a drawback for entities needing multiple. |
| Senior Enterprise Architect at DV Consulting | 4.5 | I used AWS Control Tower to implement guardrails for account creation and security enforcement. The automated user account generation feature, tied to Active Directory, is valuable. A more standardized interface would enhance user experience, despite its strong functionality. |
| DevOps Engineer at Freelance | 5.0 | AWS Control Tower simplifies AWS account management with predefined guardrails and effective Service Control Policies (SCPs) that enforce restrictions. It enhances security and efficiencies, but continuous security improvements and seamless infrastructure deployment across regions are desirable for further enhancement. |
| Cloud Strategy B2B leader at Sunrise UPC | 4.5 | I use AWS Control Tower for managing a multi-account environment internally, benefiting from its automated account provisioning and centralized policy enforcement. It's highly granular, though more resources and tutorials would improve the experience. The tool unifies policies efficiently. |
| Senior Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | AWS Control Tower has been a valuable tool for simplifying AWS account management with automated templates and guardrails, though migrating existing accounts can be tedious. Compared to AWS Landing Zone, it offers a more efficient and user-friendly experience. |
| Data Analyst and Developer at Bridge Labs | 4.5 | I recommended AWS Control Tower to integrate multiple AWS accounts, improving flexibility and performance, especially for data residency compliance. While effective for multi-account management, it needs better security log centralization to trace breaches and prevent financial loss. |
