AWS Control Tower vs Morpheus comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Morpheus Data are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Morpheus Data is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Morpheus Data’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Morpheus Data users who would recommend it.

AWS Control Tower

Read 18 AWS Control Tower reviews

789 Views
789 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Morpheus

Read 10 Morpheus reviews

3,055 Views
2,994 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

AWS Control Tower

Morpheus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Morpheus and AWS Control Tower compete in cloud management and optimization. Morpheus has the upper hand with its flexibility and multi-cloud integration, appealing to those seeking a customizable solution. AWS Control Tower is favored for enterprises focusing on AWS-native operations due to its strong governance and security features.

Features: Morpheus provides extensive multi-cloud management, robust automation, and wide integration capabilities. It allows unrestricted workflows across various clouds. AWS Control Tower focuses on security and compliance with its comprehensive setup of guardrails, centralized authentication, and automation management within AWS.

Room for Improvement: Morpheus could improve in offering more predictable pricing and reducing initial setup costs. Better customization options and simplifying multi-cloud functionalities would enhance its appeal. AWS Control Tower would benefit from expanding its support for non-AWS services, improving integration with third-party clouds, and enhancing ease of use for diverse environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Morpheus is known for seamless deployment across various clouds and strong support, suitable for businesses leveraging diverse platforms. AWS Control Tower provides a streamlined setup within the AWS environment but might require additional configuration to integrate with other services. Its customer service excels in supporting AWS-centric operations.

Pricing and ROI: Morpheus has a higher initial setup cost but offers significant ROI potential through efficient multi-cloud resource usage. AWS Control Tower offers more predictable pricing with its enveloped services, generally presenting a lower initial cost, appealing to AWS-focused businesses seeking streamlined ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Control Tower vs. Morpheus Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower vs. Morpheus

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Control Tower

Ranking in Cloud Management

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Morpheus

Ranking in Cloud Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of AWS Control Tower is 1.3%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Morpheus is 7.5%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Morpheus	7.5%
AWS Control Tower	1.3%
Other	91.2%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Unified security management ensures comprehensive compliance for account safety

Control Tower offers many valuable features for managing all account security. I can manage user security and user IAM, firewall, and other security-related tasks via Control Tower. The unified security management is a crucial aspect, and whenever an AWS organization is used, Control Tower is typically included to ensure comprehensive compliance fulfillment.

Read full review

MarkWittling

NFV Cloud Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Seamless upgrades, stable, and easy to deploy

We've been facing some challenges with Morpheus due to its design for public cloud usage. Their main focus is on allowing customers to deploy virtual machines to Azure, Google Cloud, AWS (and other private or public clouds they support). They provide features such as guidance and cost optimization. However, we're using Morpheus for on-prem v center clouds, which is probably not the user base norm. We are very pleased with the dashboard and multi-tenancy capabilities, but there are some challenges when deploying and configuring the more complex Telco workloads that have advanced networking. The integration of the NSX-T needs to be refactored. As I have been working on the API, there are some issues with the workflow engine in the automation that need to be addressed. For example, I need to be able to flag a task as fail or continue on fail if something goes wrong in the workflow. Currently, if one of the tasks in a twenty-task workflow fails, the remaining nineteen are not run, which can be a problem if one of those tasks is critical, such as when patching or doing security tasks. Thus, workflow enhancements and improvements are necessary. Morpheus desires the ability to control the full life cycle of a virtual machine from beginning to end. We have many vendors who want to establish virtual machines, but we want users to access them through Morpheus. We want the VMs to be provisioned from an external system and then be managed in Morpheus so users can only perform limited activities without being able to delete or provision them. We are currently working on resolving this issue, which I refer to as reconciliation. I have asked the developers to implement multi-tenancy, where each tenant has their own landing page at a unique URL. However, we are using groups, not tenants, so there are features we can do with tenants that we cannot do with groups. Specifically, I am trying to get the developers to add notifications support so that when a group member logs in to the Morpheus portal, they can be informed of their VMs' maintenance schedule at a specific time. This is a feature I have requested them to add. We are generally pleased with Morpheus, however, due to some restraints and restrictions, we are utilizing it differently than the majority of its users. This creates some difficulty.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Control Tower helps to save a lot of work and manage multiple accounts."

"AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."

"AWS Control Tower is a tool specifically designed for multi-account management. It offers the advantage of highly granular management."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"Security is the most valuable feature of Control Tower."

"With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution."

"There are two features in Control Tower which are the most valuable. One is the guardrails because it has preventive and detective guardrails."

"It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship."

More AWS Control Tower pros

"The most valuable feature for me was cost optimization."

"It supports many features, and it also supports some of the automation that Cloudify supports. So, in addition to just giving you basic platform management—such as the ability to deploy virtual machines and have multitenancy to log in and perform all of your basic platform management tasks—it also supports automation. You can, for example, spin up three virtual machines, and you can have each virtual machine configure each other. You can do service chaining with it. You can run scripts in Dash and Python, or you can use tools like Ansible, Puppet, or Chef. All of this is just built into the tool. It is a very powerful tool."

"The multi-cloud integrations and the DevOps and operational integrations are the most valuable. Morpheus platform is a centralized set to manage different clouds and your on-premise platforms. It does a very good job of what it is designed to do. It is very good in terms of features. It is extremely stable and easy to install. It is also very scalable. Their support is also extremely good."

"The most beneficial features for us were the API integrations with various cloud vendors like Nutanix, VMware, AWS, Azure, and GCP. It saved us the effort of doing that work ourselves."

"The most valuable feature of Morpheus is its strong integration with vSphere Cloud."

"In my organization, Morpheus is a very useful tool to automate processes—for example, provisioning new virtual machines reduces the time required, and every action is very fast using Morpheus, allowing me to prepare new environments for testing or proof-of-concept projects."

"Morpheus is an intuitive solution that is very easy to use."

"Morpheus provides a very easy and one-click solution to scaling up and down."

More Morpheus pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial if AWS offered the capability to seamlessly deploy your infrastructure to another region to ensure continuous availability and redundancy."

"The initial setup is complex."

"While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better."

"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."

"The solution's stability could be improved."

"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."

"AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well."

"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."

More AWS Control Tower cons

"We had to put in much effort ourselves since Morpheus's support wasn't always available to help us."

"We've been facing some challenges with Morpheus due to its design for public cloud usage."

"The tool could support virtual network functions better. It is really good at doing enterprise-type of things, but one of the things on which we're working with them is loading very complex virtual machines with it, such as Juniper SRX routers. It needs to support more complex virtualized resources a little bit better. Aside from that, it is a terrific tool. We really like it."

"The service is limited and somewhat lacking."

"The solution's pricing and customization need to improve."

"I would suggest adding integrated tools such as FinOps or other management tools as improvements to Morpheus."

"There is room for enhancement in integrating Morpheus with other solutions."

"The product has become overly complex. The biggest problem is that we find a bug, they fix the bug, but then another one pops up. We can never really deliver on the vision we had using Morpheus."

More Morpheus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."

"The pricing structure is closely intertwined with the specifics of your environment and the billing strategy you employ."

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."

"It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."

"It is cost-effective and the associated cost is quite minimal."

"The pay-as-you-go model ensures you're only charged for what you use, which offers great flexibility for different types of companies."

More AWS Control Tower pricing and cost advice

"Licensing is on an annual basis, and it is upfront for the year. There is no extra cost unless you want additional support or specific deployment packs."

"The solution is cheaper if you have less number of servers, but it becomes very expensive for a large number of servers."

"Morpheus doesn't directly support cost optimization, but its API integration can facilitate resource optimization. It doesn't dynamically optimize resources like an aeronautic system would; it operates step by step."

"The license is based on the number of virtual machines that Morpheus is managing. So, it is a pay-as-you-grow model."

"Initially, the license may seem like a good deal, but as we grow, it becomes costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Control Tower?

The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Control Tower?

Control Tower within the AWS Organization does not have a charge. It is free and does not incur additional charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Control Tower?

I believe AWS Control Tower could be improved. I compare it with Huawei Cloud's enterprise project, which is a similar concept but different implementation. In Huawei Cloud, you partition in one si...

See all answers

What do you like most about Morpheus?

The most beneficial features for us were the API integrations with various cloud vendors like Nutanix, VMware, AWS, Azure, and GCP. It saved us the effort of doing that work ourselves.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Morpheus?

We've been a Morpheus customer since the early days. I know what they're trying to sell now, and you'd really need a strong use case to justify the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Morpheus?

The product has become overly complex. The biggest problem is that we find a bug, they fix the bug, but then another one pops up. We can never really deliver on the vision we had using Morpheus. We...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 39% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 30% of the time

More AWS Control Tower Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Morpheus

Compared 22% of the time

CloudBolt vs Morpheus

Compared 14% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Morpheus

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Morpheus

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Morpheus

Compared 5% of the time

More Morpheus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower

October 2025

Download AWS Control Tower product report

Buyer's Guide

Morpheus

October 2025

Download Morpheus product report

Also Known As

No data available

Morpheus Cloud Management Platform, Morpheus CMP

Overview

AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Morpheus is a 100% agnostic cloud management platform (CMP) designed from the ground up to unify management of multi-cloud and hybrid IT while empowering DevOps teams with self-service provisioning of bare metal, VM, and container-based application services.

Morpheus Data

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Morpheus CMP, mcdonalds, blackrock, HSBC, astrazeneca, arris, WGU, GBG, pennstate, beyondtrust

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower vs. Morpheus

September 2025

Free Report: AWS Control Tower vs. Morpheus

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Control Tower vs. Morpheus and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Control Tower vs. Morpheus report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.