Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN Logo

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN Reviews

4.2 out of 5

What is Aruba Networks Wireless WAN?

Featured Aruba Networks Wireless WAN reviews

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN in the Wireless WAN category stands at 6.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN6.7%
Ubiquiti Wireless35.3%
Ruckus Wireless WAN28.3%
Other29.700000000000003%
Wireless WAN

PeerResearch reports based on Aruba Networks Wireless WAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless WANDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti WirelessDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WANDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Cisco Wireless WANDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Ubiquiti Wireless4.035.3%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Ruckus Wireless WAN4.128.3%92%58 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 16, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise23
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Construction Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Transportation Company
5%
University
5%
Non Profit
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Security Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Government
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Museum Or Institution
2%

Compare Aruba Networks Wireless WAN with alternative products

Learn more about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN customers

Related questions

 
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Network Engineer at Auckland University of Technology3.5I've used Aruba Networks Wireless WAN since 2019; it's stable and support is strong, but configuration is complex and fragmented. It's slightly cheaper than Cisco, yet the benefits aren't compelling enough to fully switch over.
Assistant Manager at Future Generali India Life Insurance5.0No summary available
Network Administrator at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0Our entire campus uses Aruba Networks Wireless WAN for our wireless network, offering rich functionality and improved cloud management compared to Cisco Aironet. While we are satisfied with its capabilities, the licensing and price could be improved.
IT Network Manager at Qiddiya Investment Company4.5I've used Aruba Networks Wireless WAN for three years; it's stable, user-friendly, and easy to deploy, with great roaming and Wi-Fi 6 features, though I wish monitoring data was accessible without needing additional solutions.
Vice President, Wireless Solutions at Strategic Mobility Group5.0I configure access points and install Aruba Networks Wireless WAN. While the device location pinpointing feature needs improvement, it's easier to set up than Cisco or Meraki, which are not GUI-based but more reliant on CLI-based tools.
Senior Wireless Engineer at FASTtelco3.5Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is easy to configure and cost-effective, offering significant performance benefits over Cisco and Ruckus. However, the lack of standardized brackets and console cables can complicate infrastructure setup compared to Cisco's standardized solutions.
Chief Information officer at Mobica Advanced4.5We use Aruba Networks Wireless WAN as a VPN device for connecting remote offices, finding its stability to be a significant advantage. However, we lack direct access to Aruba's Mesh portal and previously used Cisco before switching.
Network engineer at perfekt4.0We use Aruba Networks Wireless WAN as an instant access point with a built-in virtual controller. It’s stable, scalable, and easy to set up, though it lacks AI enhancements for competitive advantage. No ROI observed compared to Cisco or Juniper Mist.