Apache Web Server Reviews

Name: Apache Web Server
Brand: Apache
Rating: 4.3 (23 reviews)

Vendor: Apache

4.3 out of 5

23 reviews
100% willing to recommend

606 followers

Start review

What is Apache Web Server?

The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

Get the Apache Web Server Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server, IBM BPM, IBM DataPower Gateway and more!

Apache Web Server is the #3 ranked solution in top Application Infrastructure solutions. PeerSpot users give Apache Web Server an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Apache Web Server is most commonly compared to IBM BPM: Apache Web Server vs IBM BPM. Apache Web Server is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 54% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Featured Apache Web Server reviews

Sakthivel Veeramuthu

Technology Lead at Infosys

Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours. Because I needed to optimize the Apache web server to run it as a high performer during my customers' usage, then I needed to reduce my Apache web server resource usage for that. So that part of the thing is what I was more interested in doing. So, I mainly liked the performance and security.

Read full review

Saurav Kumar

Senior security architecture at National Payment Corporation Of India

When it comes to Apache Web Server, I don't have any suggestions for improvement because we use it in the UAT environment. For production, my company mainly uses NGINX. There is no direct package provided by the product if I want to use WAF. In NGINX, NGINX Plus has the signature update capability, but in Apache, the same feature is not available, making it an area where improvements are required. If WAF can be introduced in Apache Web Server, it would be a good improvement so that its users can implement either the WAF module or ModSecurity, as they choose. For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users. Apache Web Server should provide users with the same capabilities offered under NGINX Management Suite with the help of a simple GUI so that our company doesn't have to do anything on the terminal while directly getting to use the user interface, which can help us with the configuration part.

Read full review

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

The initial setup of Apache Web Server is extremely straightforward. The solution's deployment process can be completed in a few minutes. The deployment process depends on how the application is designed. For example, if you are designing an application that only renders static web pages, then the design will be unique. If there is a digital library of books and people are reading books in such a library, then mostly a server like Apache Web Server will host the content of the books on the application server and since everybody is trying to use the library, some of the users will be concurrently reading the same book, in that case a caching server is needed to help in load balancing. For the aforementioned example on libraries, the Apache Web Server can be used for the FTP to allow users to download or upload files and perform session tracking.

Read full review

Apache Web Server mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of Apache Web Server in the Application Infrastructure category stands at 10.5%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

PeerResearch reports based on Apache Web Server reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Infrastructure	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	Apache Web Server vs IIS	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	Apache Web Server vs NGINX Plus	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	Apache Web Server vs Microsoft .NET Framework	Apr 30, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
IBM BPM	3.9	3.0%	90%	111 interviews Add to research
IBM DataPower Gateway	4.2	4.6%	96%	29 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours."

Room for Improvement

"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"
"For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users."
"In future releases, I would like to see better server optimization."

ROI

Apache Web Server clearly demonstrates ROI. Users observe reductions in time to market and rollout, with even minor time savings per server proving impactful. Its open-source nature, user-friendliness, and lightweight design attract users who appreciate the free cost.

Pricing

Apache Web Server, being an open-source solution, incurs no licensing fees or setup costs, which appeals to enterprise buyers focused on cost-efficiency. While organizations do not pay for licenses directly, there may be some ancillary costs for devices or additional modules. More than 65% of companies opt for Apache due to its cost-effective nature, although some prefer to handle procurement and financial details through specialized internal teams.

"It is an open-source solution."
"There is no licensing cost for the product."
"It is a free-of-cost solution."

Service and Support

Apache Web Server lacks direct technical support in some regions due to sanctions or geographical limitations. Users typically rely on extensive online documentation, community forums, and internet resources. Despite the absence of corporate support options, the community provides substantial assistance. Many find the server reliable with minimal need for support. Red Hat users sometimes receive indirect Apache assistance. Some experience challenges due to limited documentation for specific implementations like Azure.

Stability

Users find Apache Web Server stable and reliable, experiencing no issues with crashes or glitches. Many rate its stability between eight and ten out of ten. It remains a preferred choice due to its reliability, widespread usage, and ease of management. Despite some gaps in updates, it remains stable for web applications and holds a competitive position among open-source web servers, with many opting for it over alternatives like NGINX for flexibility.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Apache Web Server Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

University

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Media Company

Non Profit

Insurance Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Construction Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Consumer Goods Company

Logistics Company

Engineering Company

Hospitality Company

Transportation Company

Compare Apache Web Server with alternative products

Learn more about Apache Web Server

This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

Apache Web Server was previously known as Apache HTTP Server.