Apache Web Server vs Azul Zing comparison

Apache and Azul Systems are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Azul Systems is ranked #12. Apache holds a 11.3% mindshare in AIS, compared to Azul Systems’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Azul Systems users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

1,574 Views
1,558 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azul Zing

Read 9 Azul Zing reviews

683 Views
669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

Azul Zing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Apache Web Server and Azul Zing are competitors in server solutions. Apache is more prevalent due to its open-source flexibility and adoption, but Azul Zing is superior for high-performance Java applications.

Features: Apache Web Server offers versatility, extensive plugin support, and stability across platforms. Azul Zing provides a pauseless garbage collector, high Java application performance, and low-latency operation.

Room for Improvement: Apache could enhance its paid support and improve scalability features for large enterprises. It may also benefit from better integration with certain modern development tools. Azul Zing can work on reducing licensing costs, enhancing documentation for broader usability, and expanding support for non-Java environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache benefits from community-driven support and extensive resources for ease of deployment. Customer support is varied, dependent on third-party services. Azul Zing offers specialized enterprise-level Java support, ensuring easier deployment in tech-intense environments. Its customer service is highly professional and custom-tailored.

Pricing and ROI: Apache is cost-effective as a free, open-source solution, maximizing ROI for flexible web solutions. Azul Zing requires licensing fees, justified by its specialized Java enhancements and enterprise support. The pricing reflects its value, especially for businesses focused on Java performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azul Zing

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Customer Experience Personalization (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 11.3%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azul Zing is 3.2%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apache Web Server	11.3%
Azul Zing	3.2%
Other	85.5%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

it_user500349

CTO at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

It has helped us improve our latency performance drastically

As a large scale high performance trading platform serving the high frequency trading community, latency has always been critical for our clients. Before using Azul Zing JVM, we would have had to spend a lot of effort tuning our JVM GC and profiling our application to minimize latency, which is…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

29%

Retailer

16%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Web Server?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 32% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 24% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 5% of the time

Windows Server AppFabric vs Apache Web Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

Azul Zulu vs Azul Zing

Compared 46% of the time

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework vs Azul Zing

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Hotspot vs Azul Zing

Compared 14% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs Azul Zing

Compared 13% of the time

Zulu Embedded vs Azul Zing

Compared 8% of the time

More Azul Zing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

January 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

January 2026

Download Azul Zing product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

No data available

Overview

The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

Apache

Zing is an advanced Java runtime (JVM) designed for enterprise workloads that require any combination of large memory, high transaction rates, low latency, consistent response times or high sustained throughput. Zing eliminates Java garbage collection as a factor in production, and conforms to the Java SE standard for Java SE 8, 7, and 6.

Azul Systems

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

Priceline, RBS, Credit Suisse, ING, Creditex, Nielsen, Workday, Saks Fifth Avenue, Entergy, Quotix, Puma and many more. Visit azul.com for more.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

December 2025

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.