Apache Web Server vs Azul Zing comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apache and Azul Systems are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Azul Systems is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Apache holds a 6.7% mindshare in AIS, compared to Azul Systems’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Azul Systems users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

3,781 Views
3,743 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azul Zing

Read 10 Azul Zing reviews

1,949 Views
1,364 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

Azul Zing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Apache Web Server and Azul Zing are competitors in server solutions. Apache is more prevalent due to its open-source flexibility and adoption, but Azul Zing is superior for high-performance Java applications.

Features: Apache Web Server offers versatility, extensive plugin support, and stability across platforms. Azul Zing provides a pauseless garbage collector, high Java application performance, and low-latency operation.

Room for Improvement: Apache could enhance its paid support and improve scalability features for large enterprises. It may also benefit from better integration with certain modern development tools. Azul Zing can work on reducing licensing costs, enhancing documentation for broader usability, and expanding support for non-Java environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache benefits from community-driven support and extensive resources for ease of deployment. Customer support is varied, dependent on third-party services. Azul Zing offers specialized enterprise-level Java support, ensuring easier deployment in tech-intense environments. Its customer service is highly professional and custom-tailored.

Pricing and ROI: Apache is cost-effective as a free, open-source solution, maximizing ROI for flexible web solutions. Azul Zing requires licensing fees, justified by its specialized Java enhancements and enterprise support. The pricing reflects its value, especially for businesses focused on Java performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azul Zing

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Customer Experience Personalization (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 6.7%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azul Zing is 2.8%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	6.7%
Azul Zing	2.8%
Other	90.5%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Mohakhan Khan

Software Technical Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Real-time charging has stayed consistent and cuts GC incidents while reducing cloud costs

The best features Azul Zing offers include no stop-the-world during the full GC. No stop-the-world pauses during full GC, and we hit higher TPS with fewer JVMs -- a real win for maintenance and cost. As an online charging system, we can't afford crashes or latency spikes. Before Zing, JVMs would hang and drop from the grid on missed heartbeats. GC tuning is also out-of-the-box -- no more time consuming manual tuning like with Oracle/OpenJDK with no significant outcome.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is scalable."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The solution offers good security."

"I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server; you can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it."

"Apache Web Server effectively runs any web application, including Java-based applications, and includes Apache Tomcat server, which is crucial."

"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

"Apache is a powerful tool with which you can make it do just about anything you need."

"The product is very cheap and stable."

More Apache Web Server pros

"Performance of the JVM, especially the C4 Pauseless Garbage Collection, for continuous application execution is the most valuable feature."

"With Zing, we've now been able to re-allocate those tuning resources to general product development."

"With minimal effort, Zing has helped us improve our latency performance dramatically."

"After using Azul Zing, it is almost a zero-incident situation because of the GCs."

"With minimal effort, Zing has helped us improve our latency performance dramatically."

"Zing has completely solved the garbage collection problem for us."

"With minimal effort, Zing has helped us improve our latency performance drastically."

"The non-stop garbage collector (C4 - Continuously Concurrent Compacting Collector) is the most valuable feature."

More Azul Zing pros

Cons

"I want the user interface to be more user-friendly."

"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions."

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"If Apache master the ability of hosting websites/web apps that use Microsoft's .Net framework then it will definitely be the best web server to use."

"A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system."

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"No support is available from Apache software foundation."

More Apache Web Server cons

"However, like every other great product, there is always something that can be improved."

"The profiling tools included with Zing lag behind those available for Oracle's Java implementation."

"Although Azul claims to have a fast warmup, we still experience higher latency for the first trade when our system starts up on Sundays."

"We have encounter stability issues and that has been a source of frustration at times."

"It is extremely expensive."

"Although Azul claims to have a fast warmup, we still experience higher latency for the first trade when our system starts up on Sundays."

"The licensing over non-production environments considerably affects the cost of our solution as a software vendor."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"It is an open-source solution."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 15% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 13% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

Azul Zulu vs Azul Zing

Compared 21% of the time

Oracle Hotspot vs Azul Zing

Compared 15% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs Azul Zing

Compared 14% of the time

Zulu Embedded vs Azul Zing

Compared 14% of the time

More Azul Zing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

September 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

September 2026

Download Azul Zing product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

No data available

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

Azul Zing is a high-performance Java Virtual Machine designed for real-time workloads, offering low latency and high throughput. Zing is optimized for enterprise use, making it ideal for financial services, gaming, and ecommerce.

Leveraging Azul's unique C4 garbage collector, Azul Zing enhances Java application performance by eliminating pauses and reducing latency, crucial for applications demanding consistent response times. The platform is known for its scalability and stability, ensuring swift adaptation to demanding workloads. Its architecture supports quick deployment and seamless operation in modern infrastructure, catering to enterprises that prioritize performance and reliability in mission-critical applications.

What are the key features of Azul Zing?

C4 Garbage Collector: Provides continuous operation without pauses.
Elastic Memory: Dynamically adjusts memory allocation based on needs.
Scalability: Easily scales with increased workload demands.
High Throughput: Optimized for intensive data processing tasks.

What benefits can Azul Zing offer?

Improved Latency: Minimizes delay in data processing.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure overhead through optimal resource use.
Enhanced Performance: Boosts application responsiveness and user satisfaction.
Seamless Integration: Fits into existing IT environments without extensive modification.

Azul Zing implementation is prevalent in industries like finance and telecommunications where rapid data processing and minimal latency are crucial. Its technology helps financial services handle trade cycles efficiently and assists telecommunications in processing large volumes of data with minimal downtime.

Azul Systems

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

Priceline, RBS, Credit Suisse, ING, Creditex, Nielsen, Workday, Saks Fifth Avenue, Entergy, Quotix, Puma and many more. Visit azul.com for more.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

September 2026

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.