Apache Web Server vs WebLogic Suite comparison

Apache and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Apache holds a 11.4% mindshare in AIS, compared to Oracle’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

1,532 Views
1,517 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WebLogic Suite

Read 35 WebLogic Suite reviews

902 Views
830 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

WebLogic Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

WebLogic Suite and Apache Web Server are two prominent solutions in the web server market. WebLogic Suite has the upper hand in enterprise-level features, while Apache Web Server is advantageous for cost-effectiveness and ease of use.

Features: WebLogic Suite offers robust scalability, integration with Oracle products, and advanced clustering capabilities, catering to enterprise-level requirements. Apache Web Server is renowned for flexibility, ease of configuration, and strong community-driven enhancements, serving a diverse range of deployment scenarios.

Room for Improvement: WebLogic Suite users note the need for better transaction monitoring, simplified deployment, and improved multi-tenancy features, while calling for lighter deployment options and enhanced cloud integration. Apache Web Server could benefit from improved command-line interfaces, official support availability, and better integration with modern cloud environments. Enhancing security and management interfaces could further its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WebLogic Suite deployment is suited for complex enterprise environments, offering hybrid and cloud options, with high-quality support from Oracle but concerns over accessibility and cost. Apache Web Server offers straightforward on-premises deployments, relying on community support, where ease of setup and affordability make it favorable for straightforward implementations.

Pricing and ROI: WebLogic Suite is seen as costly due to licensing; however, its extensive feature set justifies the expense for large enterprises. Apache Web Server is cost-efficient, being free and open-source, which makes it attractive for organizations prioritizing budget, contributing to its widespread adoption.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WebLogic Suite

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 11.4%, up from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WebLogic Suite is 3.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apache Web Server	11.4%
WebLogic Suite	3.4%
Other	85.2%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Tahir Ikram

Department Unified Communication Head at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

platform provides reliable infrastructure for core systems while optimizing performance for enterprise needs

One of the most valuable features of WebLogic Suite is its integration with JMS services and queue services. We are planning to migrate to an API-based application structure. We use the JMS and queue mechanism, requiring optimization to handle performance challenges related to upscaling load, application load, and end-user demands. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are necessary to optimize MQs, JMS, and JVM elements related to WebLogic Suite.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours."

"The solution offers good security."

"Apache Web Server is free of cost."

"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."

"It's reliable, configurable and generally secure."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"Its community is its most valuable feature. Solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product."

More Apache Web Server pros

"It easily connects to other Oracle products and services."

"WebLogic Suite is scalable."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support."

"Robust solution; console and enterprise management tools are really easy to work."

"The most valuable feature of WebLogic is it has excellent performance and stability compared to the previous solution we used."

"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."

"Scalability on the solution is great. It's very very easy to scale."

More WebLogic Suite pros

Cons

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"There is a security-related problem that depends on the web server's configuration."

"Its stability could be better."

"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions."

"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."

"For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users."

More Apache Web Server cons

"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."

"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."

"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters."

"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."

"This solution doesn't have connectors to other external applications."

"There is no need for improvement with WebLogic Suite, although its coherence is a bit more complicated."

"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."

"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."

More WebLogic Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The cost of the WebLogic Suite license is a bit high."

"Technical support is very costly."

"Scaling is costly."

"There is a license required for this solution and the price could be reduced."

"The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Web Server?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What do you like most about WebLogic Suite?

The solution is useful for centralizing data.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WebLogic Suite?

WebLogic Suite is high-priced, akin to a Lamborghini. Its affordability suits enterprise-level organizations with digital footprints requiring robust financial resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WebLogic Suite?

One area for improvement in WebLogic Suite is the installation time. Otherwise, there are no other disadvantages, and they have good support from Oracle. The installation time can be an issue. It i...

See all answers

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 34% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 5% of the time

InterSystems Ensemble vs Apache Web Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

Oracle SOA Suite vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 35% of the time

Azul Zulu vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 13% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle WebCenter vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 11% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 11% of the time

More WebLogic Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

December 2025

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

WebLogic Suite

December 2025

Download WebLogic Suite product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

No data available

Overview

The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

Apache

Oracle WebLogic Suite is an integrated solution for building onpremise cloud application infrastructures that span web server, application server and data grid technology tiers. It includes Oracle WebLogic Server, an application server for developing and deploying applications across conventional and cloud environments, Oracle Coherence Enterprise Edition, Oracle Web Tier, Oracle TopLink, Oracle Java Mission Control and Flight Recorder, and other component technologies.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

State Revenue Office Victoria, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Reliance Commercial Finance, Center for Railway Information Systems, Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, MCB Bank, Pacfico Seguros Generales

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite

December 2025

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.