Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo

Amazon Elastic Container Service Reviews

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Start review

What is Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Get the Amazon Elastic Container Service Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Container Service, VMware Tanzu Platform, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and more!
Amazon Elastic Container Service is the #1 ranked solution in top Containers as a Service vendors and #7 ranked solution in Container Management software. PeerSpot users give Amazon Elastic Container Service an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Amazon Elastic Container Service is most commonly compared to VMware Tanzu Platform: Amazon Elastic Container Service vs VMware Tanzu Platform. Amazon Elastic Container Service is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 70% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 30% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Amazon Elastic Container Service
May 2025
Get the report
Helped 851,491 peers since 2012

Featured Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

Read more reviews

Amazon Elastic Container Service mindshare

Product category:
Container Management
As of May 2025, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service in the Container Management category stands at 1.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management

PeerResearch reports based on Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContainer ManagementMay 19, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 19, 2025Download
ComparisonAmazon Elastic Container Service vs Red Hat OpenShift Container PlatformMay 19, 2025Download
ComparisonAmazon Elastic Container Service vs Amazon EKSMay 19, 2025Download
ComparisonAmazon Elastic Container Service vs VMware Tanzu PlatformMay 19, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
VMware Tanzu Platform4.0N/A100%22 interviewsAdd to research
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform4.222.1%96%50 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Amazon Elastic Container Service offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use. Users appreciate auto-scaling, integration with AWS services, and managed Kubernetes. The flexibility to work with Docker images and security certifications add value. ECS's high availability, along with per-second billing and zero downtime, is valued for production environments. Its support for Fargate and service discovery, as well as load balancing capabilities, enhances user experience. The platform facilitates quick deployment and efficient performance monitoring.
  • "Overall, I would rate the solution highly over time as there is no reason not to, giving it a rating of 10 out of 10."
  • "The support from AWS is incredible."
  • "Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service."

Room for Improvement

Amazon Elastic Container Service needs better usability, clearer pricing, and improved monitoring. Users face challenges with manual management and lack of trust in containerization. The pricing is high and complex, impacting budget considerations. Support and documentation require enhancements for understanding and ease of use. Users report limitations in control over infrastructure, difficulties with navigation, and integration issues with third-party tools. Auto-scaling and visualization features need optimization for efficiency and reliability.
  • "The services are costly, which is one potential drawback. Additionally, when it comes to new-age services around AI, particularly in the areas of LLMs and genomics, these services are not fully available in our region's availability domain. These are the areas where improvement is required."
  • "Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously."
  • "Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously."

ROI

Clients experienced substantial cost reductions with Amazon Elastic Container Service, moving from $2,000 to $400-$500 monthly for server expenses. It provides reliable cloud stability and time savings for support and development teams, alongside auto-scalable capabilities. Businesses benefit from a pay-as-you-go model, letting them invest only in required resources. Using ECS with Fargate eliminates costs for idle services, offering flexibility and efficiency while ensuring a return on investment for larger enterprises.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers evaluating Amazon Elastic Container Service note varied experiences with pricing. Costs can be influenced by factors such as usage, region, and scaling needs. Many highlight the pay-as-you-go model and per-hour billing, which could increase costs due to configuration errors or high resource consumption. While some users consider it expensive compared to alternatives, others find pricing competitive and reasonable for the services provided. Overall, pricing aligns with consumption and resource usage, offering flexibility for different business needs.
  • "Although AWS has successfully captured over 60 percent of the market in the cloud part, the tool is competitively way cheaper for the resources it provides compared to the other solutions."
  • "Amazon ECS is expensive."
  • "They offer a pay-as-you-go pricing model for the product."

Popular Use Cases

Amazon Elastic Container Service is used for Docker-based configurations, microservices deployment, orchestrating containers, and hosting applications. Users utilize ECS for web hosting, application development, and as an alternative to on-premise servers. It aids in container orchestration, allowing scalability, monitoring, and automated deployments. Organizations deploy ECS for backup, testing, and managing containers, leveraging its integrations with Jenkins for CI/CD. It provides a flexible infrastructure for various cloud environments and containerized applications.

Service and Support

Amazon Elastic Container Service customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Many users appreciate the knowledgeable, responsive team, noting quick response times and valuable technical assistance. Subscription levels influence response speed, with enterprise clients experiencing quicker service. However, some users find support expensive and documentation lacking. Others report occasional delays and less effective help with complex issues, particularly in specialized areas like encryption. Users with support contracts seem more satisfied with costs and service.

Deployment

Users find Amazon Elastic Container Service's initial setup generally straightforward with a mix of experiences based on technical knowledge. For some, the setup proves easy and swift, able to be accomplished independently. Others encounter complexity, requiring familiarity with specific concepts. With proper guidance and practice, most users streamline the process efficiently. Familiarity with command-line tools and documentation aids in reducing setup time. Technical backgrounds and organizational strategies influence the perceived complexity of implementation.

Scalability

Amazon Elastic Container Service is highly scalable with impressive horizontal and vertical scaling capabilities. Organizations frequently rate it between eight and ten for scalability, highlighting its ease in handling increased workloads without downtime. While some note minor constraints, particularly in certain AWS regions, many appreciate its seamless integration with load balancing and auto-scaling features. The service's strength in managing substantial usage in diverse settings makes it a preferred choice for various enterprises.

Stability

Amazon Elastic Container Service demonstrates strong stability with ratings frequently reaching ten out of ten. Users report minimal downtime and high uptime exceeding 99.9%. Technical expertise is critical for maintaining reliability, and some issues arise from user errors or lack of configuration knowledge. Customers appreciate the ability to trust its dependability. Occasional glitches are noted, but responses to these are swift. Major challenges often originate from mismanagement or infrastructure complexities rather than Amazon Elastic Container Service itself.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Amazon Elastic Container Service Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Retailer
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Media Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Non Profit
1%
Construction Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
University
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Amazon Elastic Container Service with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Amazon Elastic Container Service

Amazon Elastic Container Service was previously known as Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service.

Amazon Elastic Container Service customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Related questions

  • 3
When evaluating Container Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 4
Why is Container Management important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Container Management
Containers as a Service (CaaS)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Google Kubernetes Engine vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Google Container Engine vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
Google Container Engine vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
See all alternatives
 

Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

Sort by:
FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot user
Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Dec 29, 2024
Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads

Pros

"Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service."

Cons

"Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon Elastic Container Service as a hosting technology. My organization operates in the legal sector, and we use ECS to handle legal workloads.

What is most valuable?

Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service. Most modern workloads can be deployed on Fargate containers, abstracting away the hardware. We do not need to think about physical servers anymore, which is a significant advantage. This approach reduces costs since it eliminates the need to maintain idle service processing units. Additionally, it provides excellent horizontal scalability.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (536 words)
TP
General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Apr 11, 2025
Users benefit from inherent scalability and ease of infrastructure management in the cloud environment

Pros

"Overall, I would rate the solution highly over time as there is no reason not to, giving it a rating of 10 out of 10."

Cons

"The services are costly, which is one potential drawback. Additionally, when it comes to new-age services around AI, particularly in the areas of LLMs and genomics, these services are not fully available in our region's availability domain. These are the areas where improvement is required."

What is our primary use case?

Our organization focuses on the cloud business, particularly on cloud infrastructure, platform, or software services. Although our primary focus is not on Amazon Elastic Container Service directly, as our organization is not the end user, we are resellers. We take Amazon Elastic Container Service and other AWS products to our customers.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Amazon Elastic Container Service is its minimal manageability. We do not need to worry about the underlying infrastructure. It inherently offers scalability by default, without our IT teams needing to take the extra load to make the services available for our end users. We only need to pay for what we use, offered by scalability and elasticity, which is expected from the service provider.
*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Read full review (474 words)
Buyer's Guide
Amazon Elastic Container Service
Download free report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Container Service. Updated May 2025
851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sarbajit Rath - PeerSpot user
Senior Solutions Architect at Boeing
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Aug 5, 2023
An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud

Pros

"Amazon EC2 Container Service has multiple valuable features like load balancers and autoscalers."

Cons

"The existing domain-joined capability the solution provides during the initial boot-up of the compute should be streamlined and made a little robust."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon EC2 Container Service to take complete workloads to the cloud for various applications.

How has it helped my organization?

Amazon EC2 Container Service has reduced our infrastructure cost. We migrate some workloads from our on-premises data center to the cloud, where it runs as per the requirement, and we don't have to pay upfront. This helps reduce both the CapEx and OpEx. Some of those managed services help us to reduce the OpEx. On-demand computing efficiently manages the CapEx.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (500 words)
RK
Senior Associate Consultant at Infosys
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Mar 11, 2024
Provides good documentation that is easy to understand and learn

Pros

"It is a highly stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

Cons

"After the load balancer gets attached to Amazon Elastic Container Service clusters, I can't modify, remove, or replace it later."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution in my company since the front end of my application is deployed on Amazon Elastic Container Service. The back end of the application was deployed on Amazon EC2 for microservices. The front-end and microservices, like shipments, inventories, and a few other areas, are deployed on Amazon Elastic Container Service.

What is most valuable?

First and foremost, my company uses AWS Fargate, which is easy to handle considering that it is taken care of by AWS, especially in areas like troubleshooting. Triggering a deployment manually is very simple with Amazon Elastic Container Service since, in our company, we have to go to the particular service, update the service manually, and check the box called force a new deployment, which would trigger a deployment on all the services. Even if the deployment has to be done manually, it is not a tedious task as it is easy. The product has a concept called task definition, which makes it easy to handle environment variables.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (865 words)
DIRK UYTTERHOEVEN - PeerSpot user
Senior Enterprise Architect at DV Consulting
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Jan 22, 2024
Allows you to choose powerful, smaller, bigger, faster, secure, or dedicated machines based on your needs

Pros

"For Amazon EC2 Container Service, providing the ability for users to select specific processor, memory, disk, and interface types might be an ideal feature. But, the practicality of offering all possible physical combinations is nearly impossible due to the underlying physical machines. AWS and Azure organize options into groups based on essential components like powerful processors or critical interfaces, considering physical restrictions. While expanding these choices is conceivable, it may not be feasible from a financial and practical perspective. Customers generally comprehend this limitation, as even in their own data centers, exact physical machine requirements are often a result of a combination of factors such as price, availability, and new machine generations."

Cons

"For Amazon EC2 Container Service, providing the ability for users to select specific processor, memory, disk, and interface types might be an ideal feature. But, the practicality of offering all possible physical combinations is nearly impossible due to the underlying physical machines. AWS and Azure organize options into groups based on essential components like powerful processors or critical interfaces, considering physical restrictions. While expanding these choices is conceivable, it may not be feasible from a financial and practical perspective. Customers generally comprehend this limitation, as even in their own data centers, exact physical machine requirements are often a result of a combination of factors such as price, availability, and new machine generations."

What is our primary use case?

The Amazon EC2 Container Service involves lifting and shifting the on-site environment into AWS. It's a simple copying of your applications since you don't create new virtual machines.

What is most valuable?

Amazon EC2 Container Service offers great flexibility with a wide range of options, allowing you to choose powerful, smaller, bigger, faster, secure, or dedicated machines based on your needs. We have no concerns about EC2 containers, and the only potential downside is if you move your data center to AWS without leveraging advanced features like serverless or automatic scaling, it might be more expensive. The key is to optimize and make use of all the cloud features for cost efficiency and improved performance.      

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (843 words)
Bertin Fonge - PeerSpot user
Data Analyst and Developer at Bridge Labs
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Oct 12, 2023
The solution offers significant volume sizes and rewards experienced users

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the volume size they offer."

Cons

"EC2 is not self-explanatory enough."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution for Jenkins web server, CloudFormation, and TerraForm. I use it for Linux and Mac servers. The list is endless.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the volume size they offer. Where I'm from, having a lot of storage is a problem, and the cloud provides you that much more. You could set a volume of maybe 20 gigabytes. If you use the right AMI ID, you get it at no extra cost. You just have to be very diligent when you're setting it up.

Another thing I love is the variety of AMI IDs that are out there, from Ubuntu to Amazon Linux to Mac and so on. There are so many AMI IDs that can service whatever problem the client has.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (608 words)
PJ
Senior Systems Engineer at Mycom Osi
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Oct 5, 2023
A scalable tool that functions as a performance container management service

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability."

Cons

"My company has faced some stability issues with Amazon EC2 Container Service."

What is our primary use case?

My company deals with Amazon EC2 Container Service as a performance container management service and fault management system for telecommunication networks.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. In terms of storage resources, the solutions need to be quick to provide users with options for growth. Based on prediction, the product sometimes allows you to grow or scale up quickly.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Read full review (672 words)
Pushkar Kodag - PeerSpot user
Senior Software Engineer at Capgemini
Verified user of Amazon Elastic Container Service
Sep 7, 2023
A stable and cost-effective solution that can be used for deploying a web application

Pros

"Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable."

Cons

"Amazon Elastic Container Service’s initial setup is a bit difficult."

What is our primary use case?

We had a new product, and we used Amazon Elastic Container Service to do a proof of concept for it.

We used Amazon Elastic Container Service for deploying a web application.

What is most valuable?

Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable. We didn't do a stress test on the solution, but I could say it cost much less as compared to EC2. We would have needed three or four EC2 instances for the same application, but we could do it on a single incident EC2 container.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner/customer
Read full review (327 words)