Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Docker comparison

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Read 57 Docker reviews

2,794 Views
1,788 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Amazon Elastic Container Service and Docker compete in the containerization category. Docker seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Amazon Elastic Container Service offers powerful autoscaling capabilities and integrates seamlessly with AWS services, enhancing scalability, availability, and security. Fargate eliminates the need to manage servers, providing ease of use and billing per usage. Docker provides detailed documentation, a fast learning curve, and offers containerization features that simplify deployment and customization.

Room for Improvement: Amazon ECS could enhance its instance management, simplify billing structures, and improve technical support responsiveness. Users often find setting up ECS complex, pointing to opportunities for streamlining the initial setup. Docker could improve its documentation, offer a more robust user interface, and enhance security vulnerability reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ECS offers robust enterprise-level deployment capabilities with its auto-scaling, ideal for public cloud environments. Docker excels in hybrid and on-premises environments due to its flexibility and ease of use. ECS’s customer service receives mixed reviews, while Docker's support is regarded highly, especially for open-source projects.

Pricing and ROI: ECS is perceived as costly, beneficial for larger enterprises with substantial ROI due to scalability. Docker is cost-effective because of its open-source nature and minimal overhead, providing an excellent return on investment. ECS’s pay-per-use model with Fargate offers flexibility but involves complex billing, whereas Docker appeals to users focused on low costs and maximizing functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Docker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Docker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.3

Clients reduced costs significantly with AWS ECS, benefiting from efficient resource management and a pay-as-you-go model.

Sentiment score

8.0

Docker boosts ROI by reducing time, staffing, and costs, while improving efficiency, productivity, and simplifying deployment and collaboration.

This saving is achieved since, with EC2, the entire virtual machine must be running regardless of workload, whereas Fargate eliminates this cost.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

I can do containerization and share it with every computer, making it work for everyone.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Amazon Elastic Container Service support is responsive and helpful, but costly with occasional expertise gaps and limited documentation.

Sentiment score

4.2

Docker provides strong support with thorough documentation, community resources, and additional SLA features for paid users.

AWS partnership provides access to their architects for guidance when needed.

ShitanshuChandra

Head of Products at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We do not rely heavily on technical support from AWS as we have our own teams managing the infrastructure.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

From what I gather, customer support is great; they are quick and always available to support or help.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Amazon ECS boasts strong scalability, praised for workload management, resource flexibility, yet noted for potential reactivity issues.

Sentiment score

7.5

Docker provides scalable container management with Kubernetes, suitable for cloud environments, though needing automation improvements for broader efficiency.

Amazon Elastic Container Service has significant limitations regarding scalability.

Alexander Gomez

Lead Developer at Virtual Restaurant Solutions

Amazon Elastic Container Service has a scalability rating of ten out of ten.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Scalability becomes an inherent capability in the cloud context, and this service does well in that regard.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Previously, only one or two applications could run on a server, but now it can handle hundreds of applications, scaling up or down as needed.

Pratyay Banerjee

Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance

A realistic metric I observe is that I can scale services from two to over 20 containers without code changes.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Amazon ECS is highly stable with minimal issues, though configuration adjustments may require technical expertise for optimal performance.

Sentiment score

7.9

Docker is favored for its stability and effective container management, despite minor issues like memory and Windows compatibility.

The stability of Amazon Elastic Container Service is excellent.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Amazon Elastic Container Service is mostly very stable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Docker has been very stable in my environment, especially once best practices and proper organization were in place.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Room For Improvement

Amazon Elastic Container Service struggles with reliability, user-friendliness, integration, and cost, requiring improved security and management simplification.

Docker requires improved documentation, stability, user interfaces, and performance, alongside easier cloud integration and better community support.

Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

When it comes to new-age services around AI, particularly in the areas of LLMs and genomics, these services are not fully available in our region's availability domain.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

A lower price for Amazon Elastic Container Service would be better, but it is comparable to other offerings in the market, so it is on par in that sense.

ShitanshuChandra

Head of Products at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Docker is a time-tested, proven solution with industry-wide applications.

Pratyay Banerjee

Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance

Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.

Marcin Tokarski

Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Setup Cost

Amazon ECS features pay-as-you-go pricing, praised for scalability but sometimes costly compared to competitors, with no license fees.

Docker offers scalable open-source and enterprise options with flexible pricing, starting at $5 per user, impacting overall costs.

Amazon Elastic Container Service is quite cheap compared to Google, particularly for hosting databases.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Our customers often do a trade-off between requiring services at particular SLA levels and being willing to pay a premium price to us as partners.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Docker Desktop is free for individual developers and small teams, but a paid subscription is required for large enterprises.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.

Marcin Tokarski

Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Valuable Features

Amazon ECS offers auto-scaling, cost-effectiveness, easy AWS integration, excellent security, and efficient resource management with Fargate support.

Docker offers secure, flexible, and easy containerization with fast deployment, automation, cost savings, and seamless integration across platforms.

Main benefits that Amazon Elastic Container Service provides include saving maintenance costs in terms of saving time, and since it auto scales, we save on infrastructure costs by running at lower instances when it is not heavily used.

ShitanshuChandra

Head of Products at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It inherently offers scalability by default, without our IT teams needing to take the extra load to make the services available for our end users.

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Good security capabilities are included as well, providing image scanning, non-root containers, and minimal base images that reduce the attack surface.

For more quotes and insights, download the Docker report

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

It allows the software to run on various machines without compatibility issues, saving a lot of time.

Pratyay Banerjee

Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance

The most valuable feature is the simple containerization.

Marcin Tokarski

Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Container Management

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Containers as a Service (CaaS) (1st)

Docker

Ranking in Container Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd), AI Software Development (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Docker is 4.6%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Docker	4.6%
Amazon Elastic Container Service	1.4%
Other	94.0%

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Alexander Gomez

Lead Developer at Virtual Restaurant Solutions

Starts strong with functionalities but reveals cost limitations

The main challenge with Amazon Elastic Container Service is the significant learning curve. Everything mentioned took months to understand. It is not for the faint of heart. Though they have graphical interfaces and numerous dashboards that help create all the services graphically, learning to use Bash can be challenging. Because these are headless servers by nature, there is no graphical interface. It is not similar to Windows where you can hit the start button and look for your program, or Mac where you can look for programs on your desktop. Instead, users must understand this new paradigm of a Linux headless server, which requires using command-based prompts for builds and development.

Read full review

Containerization has standardized deployments and drives faster, more reliable delivery

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

As Docker is already a very mature tool, there are areas where it can be improved based on real-world usage. One area I consider is the Windows container experience. The pain point here is that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers because I have worked in both environments and felt that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers. This also limits the ecosystem and tooling maturity compared to Linux containers. Improvements could include performance optimization and better parity with Linux container features. Apart from that, observability and debugging is another area. The pain point is the limited native metrics available and limited logging and tracing features. Improvements could include adding a good amount of metrics, logging, and tracing, as well as better built-in observability features and easier container introspection. Network complexity is also present. I face issues with Docker networking that can become confusing in complex setups, and debugging container-to-container issues is not always intuitive. Improvements can be made with simpler networking abstractions and better built-in troubleshooting tools. Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability. These points should be kept in mind and worked on.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

Regarding the cost, Mirantis Container Cloud is cheaper than other solutions like Red Hat. The license costs around 10,000 Indian rupees per year.

What needs improvement with Docker?

Mirantis Container Cloud should have AI integration tools, which are not available right now. These tools should assist in app scalability and deployment error handling.

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 9% of the time

Google Container Engine vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 11% of the time

Portainer vs Docker

Compared 9% of the time

Minimus vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

More Docker Competitors

Product Reports

Amazon Elastic Container Service

January 2026

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Download Docker product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Docker provides a robust containerization platform, enabling identical environments across machines. With features like portability, fast deployment, and minimal resource consumption, Docker supports development, facilitating multitier architectures and integrating seamlessly with Kubernetes.

Docker offers an advanced containerization solution that enhances application management through automation and security measures. By isolating environments and managing dependencies, Docker supports platforms for scalable application development. Its integration with orchestration tools like Kubernetes and independence from host operating systems enable developers to create lightweight applications effectively. Although known for its cost efficiency and flexibility, Docker could improve in areas such as stability, command-line usability, and Windows performance integration. Users also point out the need for enhanced documentation, simplified management tools, and better persistence storage options, along with stronger marketing and easier user adoption.

What important features does Docker provide?

Containerization: Creates consistent environments across machines.
Portability: Runs on different hosts with ease.
Fast Deployment: Speeds up application launches and updates.
Security: Offers isolation and management of dependencies.
Scaling: Supports application scaling and multitier architectures.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Docker?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces resource usage with lightweight containers.
Flexibility: Integrates with orchestration tools like Kubernetes.
Performance: Enhances resource utilization and onboarding.
On-premises Management: Simplifies managing cloud and local setups.

Industries leverage Docker for application packaging, deploying microservices, and CI/CD processes. It supports DevOps, enhances backend service management, and enables resource-efficient development environments. Docker's compatibility with tools such as Jenkins ensures seamless integration and orchestration in modern IT workflows.

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Information Not Available