

Amazon Elastic Container Service and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are both leaders in the cloud service sector, excelling in container management and security, respectively. While ECS stands out for cost-effective scalability and ease of use, Microsoft Defender offers superior multi-cloud support and comprehensive security features.
Features: Amazon ECS provides auto-scaling, cost-effectiveness, and high availability with 99% uptime, along with strong security credentials and seamless integration with AWS services. Microsoft Defender for Cloud supports multi-cloud environments, integrates seamlessly with Azure services, and offers real-time threat detection and compliance management.
Room for Improvement: ECS could improve its instance management, reliability, and complex pricing structures, as well as usability and monitoring capabilities. Microsoft Defender for Cloud could benefit from simplification in policy and integration processes, improved threat intelligence, and enhanced scalability support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ECS is noted for its flexible deployment across public and private clouds, though support receives mixed reviews. Microsoft Defender is well-integrated with hybrid cloud environments and receives positive feedback for customer service but could improve on user education regarding product complexity.
Pricing and ROI: ECS is praised for its pay-per-use billing model, delivering high ROI for large-scale operations, though costs can rise with extensive use. Microsoft Defender is deemed essential for security but is considered expensive, especially for small businesses, despite the security features justifying the investment.
This saving is achieved since, with EC2, the entire virtual machine must be running regardless of workload, whereas Fargate eliminates this cost.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
Compared to not having Microsoft Defender for Cloud in place, we definitely saw an advantage by not having downtime due to a security threat.
AWS partnership provides access to their architects for guidance when needed.
We do not rely heavily on technical support from AWS as we have our own teams managing the infrastructure.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
Amazon Elastic Container Service has a scalability rating of ten out of ten.
Scalability becomes an inherent capability in the cloud context, and this service does well in that regard.
Amazon Elastic Container Service has significant limitations regarding scalability.
As we have reduced our on-premises infrastructure, it is about how we can migrate workloads to the cloud to make it easier, and then having everything fully encompassed and secured within that area makes it much easier for us to scale as needed and grow.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
The stability of Amazon Elastic Container Service is excellent.
Amazon Elastic Container Service is mostly very stable.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously.
When it comes to new-age services around AI, particularly in the areas of LLMs and genomics, these services are not fully available in our region's availability domain.
A lower price for Amazon Elastic Container Service would be better, but it is comparable to other offerings in the market, so it is on par in that sense.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
Amazon Elastic Container Service is quite cheap compared to Google, particularly for hosting databases.
Our customers often do a trade-off between requiring services at particular SLA levels and being willing to pay a premium price to us as partners.
Security has essentially no cost when compared to the cost of a breach.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
It inherently offers scalability by default, without our IT teams needing to take the extra load to make the services available for our end users.
Main benefits that Amazon Elastic Container Service provides include saving maintenance costs in terms of saving time, and since it auto scales, we save on infrastructure costs by running at lower instances when it is not heavily used.
Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 1.4% |
| Amazon Elastic Container Service | 1.4% |
| Other | 97.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.