Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Gartner Magic Quadrant: Citrix Has Good Market Vision, but Has No Carrier Partners

Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
VP Product at PeerSpot
  • 9
Published:Apr 26, 2015
Explore related topics
Search for a product comparison in WAN Optimization
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Learn what your peers think about Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
OT
Assistant Vice President - IT at Au small finance bank
May 8, 2020
May 8, 2020
Cisco is a traditional networking play and has successfully transformed from pure hardware to now software defined products. Many network engineers already use the product and makes a lot of sense for a company with Cisco history to go towards Cisco just like a company which uses citrix desktops will go for the Citrix ADC. Therefore, configuration of Cisco, while not being difficult, is mo...
See 1 answer
CW
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
May 8, 2020
Cisco is a traditional networking play and has successfully transformed from pure hardware to now software defined products. Many network engineers already use the product and makes a lot of sense for a company with Cisco history to go towards Cisco just like a company which uses citrix desktops will go for the Citrix ADC. Therefore, configuration of Cisco, while not being difficult, is more "formatted" for Engineers who have used the solution and already have deep understanding of the protocols As a relatively new comer, Citrix seems to have put more effort to make the implementation process easier in terms of GUI Now, citrix has one fourth the market share of cisco and this is crucial in terms of competency - as it is 4 times easier to get Cisco competency However, in terms of costs, I like Citrix Netscaler pooled licensing arrangement, It is a flexible licensing framework whereby there is a common pool of license regardless whether the customer performs the deployment as a physical hardware, virtual device or even a containerized solution already use the product. Therefore, Cisco has higher costs As for used cases, I have seen NetScalers used for Load Balancing, for external users to internal services and resources like XenDesktop and XenApp Finally, both Cisco and Citrix have resilient solutions and provide good support - also some dependency where you are located. As for recommendation, it depends on your specific scenario in light of above points.
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Director at PeerSpot
Nov 13, 2023
Nov 13, 2023
In managing a retail network with over a hundred branches, we moved from MPLS to Citrix SD-WAN for cost savings and flexibility. Citrix seamlessly combines Internet and MPLS, enabling us to eliminate MPLS. This shift lets us use different Internet providers at each branch while maintaining performance. The centralized monitoring and easy deployment make our network operations more efficient.
2 out of 17 answers
RP
Network Team Lead at Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Feb 20, 2019
For the load balancing of the application is for load balancing and as a VPN gateway.
reviewer1262607 - PeerSpot reviewer
Transformation Delivery Head at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Jan 22, 2020
We primarily use the solution for network latency authentication.
Related Categories
Download Free Report
Download our free Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.