Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.
The primary use case for adopting Parasoft SOAtest is to test web services/middleware testing (SOAP/REST/MQ/SAP RFC/EDI/FTP). Inbuilt support: * REST: WADL and JSON. * SOAP: WSDL. * SAP RFC * Message queuing supported: JMS, MQ, and NET WCF. * Protocols supported: TCP/IP, FTP, EDI, WSDL, WADL, WS-*, UDDI, RMI, EJB, webMethods, TIBCO, SMTP, and custom. * Languages Supported: Java, JavaScript, Groovy, Jython * Virtualization * Third-party tool integration (plug and play) * Stored procedure testing and DB validation * UI recording through Selenium WebDriver. * I've used this solution for more than 6.7 years.
Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest. What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
Test Automation Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Jul 1, 2019
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually. It is not as fast and it's a bit clunky, especially if you use it for the whole day or for a long time, it doesn't save the data, for example. So, it's a bit clunky and slow.
Download our free Application Security Testing (AST) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft, Sonar, Synopsys, and more! Updated: August 2023.
Technical support is helpful.
We have seen a return on investment.
Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.
Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.