No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo

VMWare Avi Load Balancer Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is VMWare Avi Load Balancer?

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is designed for seamless integration with host environments, providing a user-friendly interface, stable deployment, scalability, and reliable performance.

Get the VMWare Avi Load Balancer Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about VMWare Avi Load Balancer, NetScaler, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and more!
VMWare Avi Load Balancer is the #12 ranked solution in top Application Delivery Controllers. PeerSpot users give VMWare Avi Load Balancer an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. VMWare Avi Load Balancer is most commonly compared to NetScaler: VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs NetScaler. VMWare Avi Load Balancer is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 55% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 18% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
May 2026
Get the report
Helped 896,298 peers since 2012

Featured VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews

Read more reviews

VMWare Avi Load Balancer mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of VMWare Avi Load Balancer in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 4.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
VMWare Avi Load Balancer4.9%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)13.0%
NetScaler12.1%
Other70.0%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)May 28, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 28, 2026Download
ComparisonVMWare Avi Load Balancer vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)May 28, 2026Download
ComparisonVMWare Avi Load Balancer vs NetScalerMay 28, 2026Download
ComparisonVMWare Avi Load Balancer vs HAProxyMay 28, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
NetScaler4.212.1%91%107 interviewsAdd to research
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)4.113.0%83%124 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated May 28, 2026

Valuable Features

VMWare Avi Load Balancer's most valuable features include seamless integration with host environments, API-driven architecture, extensive policy and analytics capabilities, stability, scalability, and reliability. Users appreciate its web application firewall, application debugging features, and flexible deployment capabilities. The user interface is praised for offering clear visibility and simplified network infrastructure management. Avi's ability to automate processes and provide detailed monitoring through dashboards enhances user experience and operational efficiency.
  • "Overall, VMWare Avi Load Balancer has positively impacted our operation, as it gives us true redundancy for our UAGs for remote access."
  • "The positive impact of VMWare Avi Load Balancer was improved application availability for the centralized PMS environment."
  • "VMWare Avi Load Balancer has created a smoother failover process without issues, keeping the state normal, where typically there would be manual intervention, and time lost went from potentially five minutes down to under thirty seconds with Avi, resulting in no recorded incidents."

Room for Improvement

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is often considered to have an expensive pricing structure and complex setup. Users find the integration with other VMware products and third-party tools lacking, as well as insufficient security features like WAF. Documentation is identified as inadequate, affecting usability and training. Enhancements in policy debugging, traffic routing visibility, and support for hyperscale environments are desired. A unified offering without separate modules is preferable for larger organizations.
  • "The scalability of VMWare Avi Load Balancer is not great, but it does what it needs to do in the single appliance we have, so that is acceptable."
  • "One area that VMWare Avi Load Balancer could improve is the learning curve and complexity for smaller IT teams because it is an enterprise-grade solution, and deployment and troubleshooting usually require experienced VMWare or network engineers."
  • "In my opinion, VMWare Avi Load Balancer is a complicated tool with many advanced features that can be beneficial, but policies are powerful yet difficult to debug when traffic behaves unexpectedly or becomes heavy."

ROI

Several entities reported seeing clear returns from VMWare Avi Load Balancer. Moving from a legacy setup led to significant benefits, with failover times reducing from five minutes to under thirty seconds. Some appreciated not having to invest heavily in hardware or high bandwidth licensing, resulting in quicker returns. However, a few noted no gains yet, citing specific use cases or lack of investment return experience.

Pricing

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is perceived as both cost-effective and competitively priced, especially compared to other solutions like F5. Users appreciate its capacity and consumption model, which allows flexible licensing based on bandwidth or CPU utilization. Some find it moderately priced while others rate it highly for affordability. Licensing can vary significantly based on deployment needs, with no extra costs beyond standard licensing. Despite differing opinions on expense, many agree it's a value-driven choice.
  • "The tool is expensive."
  • "I rate the solution price a four to five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, since it is an affordable tool."
  • "The licensing costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer are really variable. The product can be sold from a bandwidth utilization perspective. It can be sold from a per CPU perspective, depending on if you're looking at on-premises or hyperscale environments. Licensing costs vary quite a bit if you're familiar with the AWS Calculator, where you can see that it can widely vary per licensing model.On a scale of one to five, with one being not very good value for the money and five being great, I would rate the pricing for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer a five because its pricing is extremely competitive.Not all features are included with the license, for example, there's single licensing."

Popular Use Cases

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is primarily used for application delivery and high availability in cloud and database environments. It supports clusters with Windows failover clustering and multiple database proxies, offering high visibility and advanced capabilities. It facilitates read-write splitting for databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL, ensuring database resiliency and avoiding single points of failure. It integrates with Kubernetes for dynamic scaling and provides a platform for cloud-native database as-a-service applications.

Service and Support

VMWare Avi Load Balancer's customer service varies. Some resources excel, especially during presales, while others fail to meet expectations. Certain teams are praised for their expertise and troubleshooting, receiving high ratings, while others report less satisfactory experiences. Integration with existing VMware tools enhances support experience for some. Reported support efficiency lacks layers, facilitating streamlined assistance. Varying user feedback includes a high level of satisfaction, yet others mention limitations in production deployment scenarios.

Deployment

VMWare Avi Load Balancer set up is generally straightforward. A few found it complex due to the need for application-level and networking-level expertise. Some required coordination among multiple teams, but others managed independently. Deployments typically involved VMs with high availability configurations, often taking a couple of hours to a week, depending on additional tasks. Automatic deployment of service engines simplified virtual service creation. Most found the initial setup relatively easy, rating it high on ease.

Scalability

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is generally seen as scalable, particularly due to its architecture of control and data plane segregation. Although some find it less scalable compared to hardware platforms, it performs well for a variety of users, including application developers and database engineers. While scalability is praised, some find expansion challenging due to infrastructure limitations. Usage levels vary, with organizations using it extensively across many applications.

Stability

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is regarded as reliable by most users, experiencing no bugs or crashes. Some encounter slowdowns under high stress, suggesting potential limitations of servers rather than the software itself. Many users commend its fast recovery and robust performance, rating stability highly. Though suitable for small to medium enterprises, some express doubts about its effectiveness in extensive infrastructures despite claims of its deployment in large environments like the New York Stock Exchange.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our VMWare Avi Load Balancer Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business111
Midsize Enterprise71
Large Enterprise224
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
5%
Outsourcing Company
4%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Retailer
2%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%

Compare VMWare Avi Load Balancer with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about VMWare Avi Load Balancer

VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers a potent combination of advanced traffic management, application delivery, and network visualization tools tailored for cloud and modern infrastructures. Its core functionalities revolve around a robust web application firewall and comprehensive analytics, which make it a strong contender against competitors like NetScaler. Despite its expensive nature and certain integration challenges, it supports dispersed services with a single control plane. Its graphic interface aids in efficient network management, yet there's room for improvement in features like WAF, documentation, and multi-cloud environment support.

What are the key features of VMWare Avi Load Balancer?
  • Integration with Host Environments: Ensures seamless adoption across diverse infrastructure platforms.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management and accelerates deployment processes.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands efficiently.
  • Robust Web Application Firewall: Provides enhanced security for web applications.
  • Powerful Analytics: Offers detailed insights for optimal traffic management and performance optimization.
  • Cluster Visualization: Visualizes network clusters for streamlined management.
What benefits do users find in VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews?
  • Enhanced Network Performance: Users experience improved load balancing capabilities.
  • Simplified Management: The UI simplifies network and cluster operations.
  • Deployment Flexibility: Offers various options for deploying across cloud infrastructures.
  • Single Control Plane: Facilitates management of dispersed services effectively.

In the tech industry, VMWare Avi Load Balancer is primarily utilized for application delivery control, taking on roles such as web application firewalls and traffic visibility in cloud infrastructures. Its enhanced interface makes it a preferred choice for organizations transitioning from traditional load balancers, especially in roles like global load balancing and Kubernetes service mesh integration.

VMWare Avi Load Balancer was previously known as Avi Software Load Balancer.

VMWare Avi Load Balancer customers

Palo Alto Networks, DGDean, Swisslos

Related questions

  • 128
When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 408
Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
  • 125
Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
  • 116
What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
  • 132
Why do I need an ADC solution?
  • 140
What is the best ADC solution?
  • 126
Why is Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
NetScaler vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
NetScaler vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
HAProxy vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
HAProxy vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
NGINX Plus vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
NGINX Plus vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Fortinet FortiADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Radware Alteon vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Radware Alteon vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Kemp LoadMaster vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Kemp LoadMaster vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
LoadBalancer Enterprise vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
LoadBalancer Enterprise vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Akamai Ion vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Akamai Ion vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
AVANU WebMux vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
AVANU WebMux vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
See all alternatives
 
VMWare Avi Load Balancer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Database Engineer, SRE at Interswitch Group4.5I utilize VMWare Avi Load Balancer for database high availability and failover, appreciating its software-defined, policy-driven approach and significant ROI. However, debugging complex policies can be challenging, needing better traffic visibility for easier troubleshooting.
Vdi Consultant at Garbutt Ltd4.0I use VMware Avi Load Balancer for reliable, redundant UAG load balancing in AWS, appreciating its ease of use and low cost. While stable, I wish for improved health monitors, built-in failover, and better scalability to reduce GSLB reliance.
IT Support at Raddison Blu Marina4.0I found VMWare Avi Load Balancer stable and reliable for our centralized PMS, ensuring high availability and traffic distribution in our VMWare environment. Its enterprise nature means a learning curve, but it performed well for us, earning an 8/10.
Pre Sales at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5I find VMware's recent licensing changes and high VCF prices problematic, causing client churn. The Avi Load Balancer is expensive, offers no unique features over competitors, and customer service is inconsistent. I rate it 3/10, recommending lower prices and standalone options.
Trainer/Consultant at Koenig Solutions Pvt. Ltd.3.5I've found VMWare Avi Load Balancer stable and scalable, with valuable load balancing and WAF features, though its documentation needs improvement. Its analytics and monitoring are helpful, but wider multi-cloud use and GSLB capabilities could be better.
Analyst at Nomura Securities5.0In my company, we use Avi Networks Software Load Balancer for its modern interface and infrastructure. While the UI is highly valuable, its documentation needs improvement. We haven't seen ROI yet, but its flexibility and scalability are advantageous.
Sr. Architect at NBC Universal2.5I am currently evaluating this stable product, finding its integration good despite its immaturity. Setup is straightforward, but it lacks scalability and third-party integration. I rate it 5/10 and advise thorough comparison before adoption, as it doesn't match our existing product line's maturity.
Digital Transformation Management Director at IU3.5Avi Networks Software Load Balancer simplified our network infrastructure management with virtual ID usage for multiple services, benefiting my previous organization. However, its network analytics and monitoring features need improvement and lacks deep troubleshooting and public IP capabilities, unlike F5.