It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.
We are using the open-source version of this solution.
It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.
We are using the open-source version of this solution.
Use floating licenses strategically.
The Corporate Edition, or one of the bundles, is the way to go.
Use floating licenses strategically.
The Corporate Edition, or one of the bundles, is the way to go.
Pricing comes in at about $100 for a year's subscription, which is very reasonable if this is a tool that you will use more than once.
The pricing and licensing are fine, though I wish they didn't require you to buy the licenses in batches of five.
Pricing comes in at about $100 for a year's subscription, which is very reasonable if this is a tool that you will use more than once.
The pricing and licensing are fine, though I wish they didn't require you to buy the licenses in batches of five.
This solution provides really great value for the money.
Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans.
This solution provides really great value for the money.
Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans.
It has a lower price point than the competition.
The cost of the software is reasonably priced.
It has a lower price point than the competition.
The cost of the software is reasonably priced.
It is only necessary to pay for licenses when ready to deploy applications to production.
If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so.
It is only necessary to pay for licenses when ready to deploy applications to production.
If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so.
Prices are high. However, they are worth it if the organization utilizes the tool to its full potential.
The tool is expensive.
Prices are high. However, they are worth it if the organization utilizes the tool to its full potential.
The tool is expensive.
The primary reasons that erwin was selected were that it was much more affordable for us [than Embarcadero] and it was easily maintainable.
The price should be lower in order to be on the same level as its competitors.
The primary reasons that erwin was selected were that it was much more affordable for us [than Embarcadero] and it was easily maintainable.
The price should be lower in order to be on the same level as its competitors.
If you want to use additional features, such as the Risk Management capability, then it is a little too expensive.
It is very expensive.
If you want to use additional features, such as the Risk Management capability, then it is a little too expensive.
It is very expensive.
have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for.
Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good.
have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for.
Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good.
This solution is expensive.
In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades.
This solution is expensive.
In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades.
Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost.
The price of this product is moderate.
Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost.
The price of this product is moderate.
We are seeing ROI from this solution. The solution has saved us time.
They have a free subscription model that gives a lot of power to the users.
We are seeing ROI from this solution. The solution has saved us time.
They have a free subscription model that gives a lot of power to the users.
I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related.
First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly...
I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related.
First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly...
There is a student version of this solution that can be used for free.
There is a student version of this solution that can be used for free.
Pricing will differ between enterprises based on needs such as customization, but the company uses a standardized algorithm for determining this.
Scalability-wise, it is an expensive product.
Pricing will differ between enterprises based on needs such as customization, but the company uses a standardized algorithm for determining this.
Scalability-wise, it is an expensive product.
My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive.
The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive.
My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive.
The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive.
