BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Visual Paradigm comparison

Read 27 Visual Paradigm reviews

3,757 Views
1,140 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Visual Paradigm and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are competing in the enterprise modeling and architecture space. Each offers unique strengths, but BiZZdesign HoriZZon appears to have an edge due to its sophisticated enterprise architecture capabilities catering to large-scale projects.

Features: Visual Paradigm offers comprehensive diagramming tools, agile development support, and modeling plugins for collaborative workflows. It supports a wide range of languages and methodologies such as UML, BPMN, and ArchiMate. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides advanced architectural analysis tools, extensive integration capabilities, and decision-support features. It excels with its capability to model using ArchiMate principles and offers dashboards that are beneficial for higher management.

Room for Improvement: Visual Paradigm could improve by enhancing its integration with other tools and refining user interface consistency. Expanding its repository and enhancing cloud collaboration features would be beneficial. BiZZdesign HoriZZon could focus on improving user onboarding experience, reducing complexity in setup, and expanding support for more intuitive model manipulation. Enhancing its real-time collaboration capabilities would also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Paradigm offers straightforward deployment and effective customer support, emphasizing ease of use for small to medium businesses. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides flexible deployment options and premium customer service with dedicated training, ideal for complex implementations requiring seamless integration.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Paradigm is cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, providing a solid ROI for teams focusing on process optimizations and agile methodologies. BiZZdesign HoriZZon, while more expensive upfront, justifies the investment by enhancing decision-making for large enterprises with its rich feature set, offering substantial ROI through strategic insights for comprehensive enterprise analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. Visual Paradigm Report (Updated: June 2025).

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. Visual Paradigm

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Business Process Design

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (6th)

Visual Paradigm

Ranking in Business Process Design

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 2.2%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Paradigm is 6.3%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

BijoyTalukder

Enterprise Architect at Tata Consultancy

Helps to get a clear overview of our enterprise architecture, especially when dealing with multiple departments

One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs. While the platform offers REST APIs, they have limitations when it comes to retrieving and exporting data. Obtaining detailed information at the individual application or component level, including IDs, costs, and deployment-related data, can be challenging through these APIs. This limitation makes it difficult to smoothly export such granular data. I have raised this issue with the BiZZdesign team, and they expressed interest in addressing it, but I'm not aware of the current status of this improvement effort. Nonetheless, improving the usability and flexibility of the REST APIs for data extraction is an area that could enhance the platform's capabilities.

Read full review

Angie Ibrahim Eissa

Founder & Managing Partner at BBL

A software application designed for software development teams to model business information systems and manage development processes

Setting up Visual Paradigm is easy. There's hardly any configuration needed, unlike some other tools. You just choose your method and diagram type, and you're good to go. As for improvements, integrating project management features with diagrams could be better. Viewing outputs could also be smoother, especially when working with multiple files.Deployment is quick and painless. It practically takes no time at all to set up. And because I also teach at the university, I use Visual Paradigm for my classes and case studies. It's easy to switch between products, and my students have no trouble using it on their own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the main advantages of this solution is that they have representation in the Open Group Forum, which means that any changes in ArchiMate are immediately implemented in BiZZdesign."

"I like the flexibility of the modeling part for standards like ArchiMate and, at the same time, BPMN. It allows us to connect elements from different areas and to have a single repository and a single source of truth. It gives us one place to do analysis throughout the organization."

"The most valuable features are the application, portfolio, data, architectures, and modeling things."

"The most valuable features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon, from my experience, include its out-of-the-box connectors, such as integration with ServiceNow, Excel, and SQL databases, making data repository management more efficient."

"The feature I find most valuable is that the start times and loading times are short. It takes only a few seconds to load the repository and whenever I want to open diagrams, they are there almost immediately."

"I used BiZZdesign HoriZZon at two organizations. At Manchester Metropolitan University, I used it with a small team for architectural modeling of the student record system. We modeled teams, process objects, and their interactions with applications. We also used it to model a gradual rollout with plateaus showing migration over time. At the BBC, I used it to model software services for publishing content online. I showed key model views to senior stakeholders using Horizon, allowing them to modify and score applications and services."

"The initial setup of this solution was very straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is that it allows you to work with different methods, using the same tool."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

"It is a scalable solution since it can be used at an individual level as well as for enterprise-sized businesses."

"The pricing model is attractive."

"The solution is very user-friendly. It's easy to just open it and start working."

"I like the fact that this solution is complete."

"The Visual Paradigm business process forms for designing we good. There was not a lot of configuration for the process diagram."

"I like the structure. I can see the diagrams and everything I created."

"What I found most valuable in Visual Paradigm is diagramming. I had a great user experience as diagramming in the tool is easy and convenient, even for complex diagrams or models. Visual Paradigm is the perfect tool for me, and I prefer it over Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. Visual Paradigm is better for collaboration if you consider, for example, versioning, so this is another valuable tool feature that's simple and embedded in the solution. In Visual Paradigm, it's also easy to set up the project with team members and collaborate, and it's also a pro of the tool."

"The most valuable feature of the Visual Paradigm that I use is process modeling. Additionally, the solution has a complete set of features."

More Visual Paradigm pros

Cons

"The repository of duplicate objects is bad."

"The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult."

"There could be simpler modelling."

"I have seen table charts where, if the chart is a little too big, it does not fit in HoriZZon and it is not at all visible... There have been several times where we could not publish a chart properly and we had to break the chart into small tables and create multiple artifacts, creating a complete mess. This should be seriously taken up by BiZZdesign because there is a lot of scope for improvement in terms of usability. It's not at all good, unfortunately."

"The automatic data collection and interface need improvement."

"Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect."

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."

"Scalability is a bit of a problem for BiZZdesign. There is always a possibility it will failover."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

"There is a certain inherent complexity when creating UML diagrams."

"There are some connectivity issues that crop up rarely when used with SQL Server."

"Visual Paradigm is much better now. But each project has its own challenges, which is why I'm exploring different tools for my new projects. For instance, designing reports can be tough, especially with the costly intervention of professional services from vendors."

"I would like to see the ability to easily export to groupware, such as Atlassian Confluence."

"In terms of room for improvement in Visual Paradigm, I tried looking for one. I'm pleased with the tool, but it would be great if you could integrate Visual Paradigm with more tools. For example, when moving from Visual Paradigm to another tool, such as Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, the process could be improved a bit. Still, I wonder if it's not limited by the standards Visual Paradigm follows, such as XMI files. It could be connected to limitations related to the standards rather than a tool limitation. When you move projects from Visual Paradigm into Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect via XMI files, you lose all your notes from the elements, so this is an area for improvement in Visual Paradigm. TOGAF support is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Visual Paradigm. I'd also like the tool to have ArchiMate support. If both TOGAF and ArchiMate could be supported in Visual Paradigm and made part of a lower level of licensing or cheaper licensing models, that would be best for me."

"I would like to see something for visualizing innovation work maps."

"Visual Paradigm could improve many aspects. The performance could be better because it can be low. When we have large and complicated models, it has a low speed and many bugs. Sometimes the solution stops and you have to restart Microsoft Windows on your PC. The larger database modeling cannot be done properly, I have to use another solution called SAP PowerDesigner."

"The product's versioning capability needs improvement."

More Visual Paradigm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"The price is reasonable."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"This is an open-sourced solution, it is free to use."

"In terms of pricing, I find Visual Paradigm's subscription services reasonable, especially for the modern and standard editions. However, the premium products can be a bit pricey, especially considering our location in the Middle East. Currently, paying around a hundred dollars per user translates to almost six hundred Egyptian pounds, which can add up. For enterprise licensing, I think the perpetual license option could be more affordable. If it were cheaper, say around five hundred dollars, I would have invested in multiple perpetual licenses long ago. Sometimes, to manage costs, we share accounts among team members or switch access on and off for certain members who aren't actively working on projects. As for additional costs, there are charges for cloud services, which I'm considering because I've already exceeded the free capacity."

"Over the years I've seen an increase in price, and it makes it difficult for a single person company, like me, to decide whether to extend the license."

"I rate the pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Compared to other solutions such as IBM Rational which is expensive, This solution is priced low."

"Visual Paradigm has two models available. One of them is the educational edition, and another is the business edition. For my personal usage, I use the educational version mostly. In a project, my customers have to purchase a license."

"Visual Paradigm costs $99 per license. I chose the cheapest option from the pricing list."

"You can move between the tiers from month to month so you are not restricted to one pricing model."

More Visual Paradigm pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Educational Organization

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

There is room for improvement in BiZZdesign HoriZZon. It's quite robust and has good online forums where people discuss it, though maybe the interface can improve, but I don't want to criticize it ...

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

The typical use case with BiZZdesign HoriZZon is basically for enterprise architecture and also for business process modeling.

What do you like most about Visual Paradigm?

The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Paradigm?

I purchased Visual Paradigm on my own, and it was competitively priced, so I was fine with the pricing.

What needs improvement with Visual Paradigm?

The product can always get better as the industry changes, however, I didn't necessarily feel it was lacking for what I did with it.

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 10% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 37% of the time

Visio vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 19% of the time

Lucidchart vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 16% of the time

Bizagi vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 7% of the time

Idera ER/Studio Business Architect vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 1% of the time

More Visual Paradigm Competitors

Product Reports

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

June 2025

Download Visual Paradigm product report

May 2025

Also Known As

HoriZZon

No data available

Overview

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

Multi-discipline collaboration
Data Integration
Advanced analytics
Models and Roadmaps
Governance & Security
Business Insight Graph

BiZZdesign

Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Adobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota