Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: TrendAI
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Quad9, and iboss. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat protection, advanced AI-driven filtering, and comprehensive web security features that ensure safe browsing and secure data handling, making it a top choice for businesses seeking reliable online protection.

TrendAI Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with TrendAI, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] is ideal for budget-focused buyers with essential protection needs. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate appeals to those seeking advanced threat protection and integration capabilities, justifying its higher cost with extensive features and superior long-term security value.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate's setup cost is higher, highlighting a significant price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate's setup cost is higher, highlighting a significant price difference.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Quad9
3.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Quad9
3.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] appeals to those seeking extensive control due to its comprehensive management tools. In comparison, Quad9 is ideal for cost-conscious buyers who prioritize straightforward deployment and minimal expenses through its DNS-level security and open-source model.
Download Quad9 vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] involves significant setup costs, whereas Quad9 offers a simpler and often lower-cost setup, highlighting a key difference in deployment investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] involves significant setup costs, whereas Quad9 offers a simpler and often lower-cost setup, highlighting a key difference in deployment investment.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust support. In comparison, iboss impresses with advanced features and scalability. A tech buyer favoring affordability may choose Trend Micro, while one prioritizing innovation might opt for iboss's comprehensive solution.
Download Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] vs. iboss Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] involves variable setup costs based on needs, while iboss offers a flat-rate setup fee ensuring predictable budgeting.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] involves variable setup costs based on needs, while iboss offers a flat-rate setup fee ensuring predictable budgeting.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] offers strong threat detection and integration, appealing to those prioritizing malware protection. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella provides superior threat intelligence and deployment flexibility, ideal for environments needing robust remote worker support and comprehensive adaptability.
Download Cisco Umbrella vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] involves a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Umbrella, making it more appealing for budget-conscious businesses, while Cisco Umbrella offers a comprehensive feature set that may justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] involves a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Umbrella, making it more appealing for budget-conscious businesses, while Cisco Umbrella offers a comprehensive feature set that may justify its higher initial investment.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Zscaler Internet Access
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] appeals with lower costs and effective protection. In comparison, Zscaler Internet Access offers advanced cloud-based security and integration. Buyers may choose Trend Micro for affordability, while others might prefer Zscaler's scalability and enhanced threat protection.
Download Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Zscaler Internet Access, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Zscaler Internet Access, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] offers effective threat protection and URL filtering with a quick deployment process. In comparison, Skyhigh Security provides comprehensive cloud integrations and advanced analytics, offering extensive support and scalability, although it requires more initial setup and investment.
Download Skyhigh Security vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] often incurs higher setup costs compared to Skyhigh Security, which is noted for a more cost-effective initial setup. These differences may significantly impact budget-conscious decisions for organizations evaluating both solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] often incurs higher setup costs compared to Skyhigh Security, which is noted for a more cost-effective initial setup. These differences may significantly impact budget-conscious decisions for organizations evaluating both solutions.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
3.9 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] is attractive for smaller organizations with straightforward deployment and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway offers advanced integration and premium support, appealing to larger enterprises seeking enhanced security features and comprehensive protection across web interactions.
Download Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] had a lower setup cost compared to Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Trend Micro users. Forcepoint's higher initial investment may be offset by its advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] had a lower setup cost compared to Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Trend Micro users. Forcepoint's higher initial investment may be offset by its advanced features and capabilities.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Perception Point Advanced Email Security
4.5 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] attracts tech buyers with robust URL filtering and lower costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Perception Point offers advanced features like dynamic content scanning, making it a superior choice for those prioritizing comprehensive, future-proof security solutions.
Download Perception Point Advanced Email Security vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Perception Point Advanced Email Security, which provides a more cost-effective solution for email security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Perception Point Advanced Email Security, which provides a more cost-effective solution for email security needs.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiProxy
4.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] is ideal for those seeking user-friendly deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiProxy appeals to tech buyers focusing on advanced features like SSL inspection and scalability for comprehensive protection and value-oriented long-term investment.
Download Fortinet FortiProxy vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiProxy offers more competitive pricing, making Fortinet a more cost-effective choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiProxy offers more competitive pricing, making Fortinet a more cost-effective choice.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway
4.4 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] offers cost-effective malware protection and reliable customer service, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway provides advanced cloud security features and high ROI, attracting those who prioritize comprehensive data protection.
Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] offers lower setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which can be significant when evaluating initial expenses. Netskope provides more advanced features but comes with higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] offers lower setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which can be significant when evaluating initial expenses. Netskope provides more advanced features but comes with higher setup costs.
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Symantec Proxy
3.7 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Logo
Symantec Proxy
3.7 out of 5
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] attracts buyers with its cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Symantec Proxy offers advanced threat protection and comprehensive web traffic control, appealing to those prioritizing deep security insights and a long-term approach to reducing security breaches.
Download Symantec Proxy vs. Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] Report
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a more cost-effective initial setup cost compared to Symantec Proxy, which can be higher. Symantec Proxy offers advanced features, justifying its higher setup cost for more extensive security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Web Security [EOL] has a more cost-effective initial setup cost compared to Symantec Proxy, which can be higher. Symantec Proxy offers advanced features, justifying its higher setup cost for more extensive security needs.

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Internet Security
Firewalls