Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Darktrace.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection capabilities, superior network traffic analysis, and comprehensive real-time threat intelligence, ensuring robust security for enterprises.
TrendAI Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with TrendAI, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Fortinet FortiGate excels in scalability and integration, appealing to diverse IT environments. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers robust threat detection but lacks FortiGate's adaptability, making it ideal for companies prioritizing advanced persistent threat identification and zero-day vulnerabilities.
Fortinet FortiGate setup costs are clear and reasonable, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] presents a higher setup cost, emphasizing a significant difference in initial financial commitments.
Fortinet FortiGate setup costs are clear and reasonable, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] presents a higher setup cost, emphasizing a significant difference in initial financial commitments.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers real-time network visibility and customizable analysis, appealing to those needing detailed threat insights. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, integrated with Windows, attracts users seeking cost-effective, comprehensive threat protection with seamless integration across Microsoft ecosystems.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Darktrace excels in real-time network monitoring and autonomous threat response, valuable for minimizing alert noise. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery effectively identifies zero-day threats with email detection and sandboxing, beneficial for its integration with other Trend Micro products for robust security management.
Vectra AI offers AI-driven alert reduction and proactive threat triaging. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery excels in sandbox simulation and advanced threat analysis. Vectra AI supports hybrid environments, while Trend Micro provides end-to-end threat visibility and reasonable pricing.
Vectra AI offers a straightforward setup process, often incurring lower upfront costs compared to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL], which involves more extensive configuration efforts, resulting in higher initial expenses.
Vectra AI offers a straightforward setup process, often incurring lower upfront costs compared to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL], which involves more extensive configuration efforts, resulting in higher initial expenses.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire excels with robust integration, real-time threat prevention, and firewall integration. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers extensive threat intelligence sharing and strong sandbox capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing end-to-end visibility and comprehensive threat management.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire incurs moderate setup costs, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] is noted for its higher initial investment. The significant disparity in deployment expenses highlights a clear difference in upfront financial commitments.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire incurs moderate setup costs, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] is noted for its higher initial investment. The significant disparity in deployment expenses highlights a clear difference in upfront financial commitments.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery provides comprehensive threat visibility with real-time monitoring and strong sandboxing capabilities, suitable for those needing adaptable security. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers extensive network visibility and analytics, appealing to buyers requiring thorough insights into network behaviors.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery excels in threat detection with customizable sandboxing and strong network security, ideal for on-premises deployments needing advanced persistent threat monitoring. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Identity offers cost-effective identity security integration within Microsoft 365, enhancing cloud-based threat management and user behavior analytics.
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is favored for its cost-effectiveness and seamless integration. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] excels in advanced threat detection precision, attracting those prioritizing feature-rich security. While Gigamon aids smooth deployment, Deep Discovery provides extensive threat analysis capabilities.
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline offers a more cost-effective setup than Trend Micro Deep Discovery, with the latter also nearing its end-of-life status, potentially affecting future support and upgrades.
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline offers a more cost-effective setup than Trend Micro Deep Discovery, with the latter also nearing its end-of-life status, potentially affecting future support and upgrades.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics attracts tech buyers with advanced analytics and flexible deployment options. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery appeals with integrated threat detection and a straightforward licensing approach. Splunk’s real-time data focus contrasts with Trend Micro’s emphasis on integration and scalability.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics setup costs are higher, offering robust tools for threat detection, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers a more affordable option with essential network security features but may lack the advanced capabilities of Splunk.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics setup costs are higher, offering robust tools for threat detection, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers a more affordable option with essential network security features but may lack the advanced capabilities of Splunk.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers competitive pricing, effective threat detection, and robust security features. In comparison, ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides superior network visibility and seamless integration capabilities. Tech buyers prioritize Trend Micro for cost efficiency, whereas they prefer ExtraHop for advanced features compensating for higher pricing.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] requires moderate setup costs, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in startup expenses.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] requires moderate setup costs, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in startup expenses.
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers dynamic scaling and robust threat protection with centralized management, making it ideal for flexible deployments. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] excels in advanced threat detection and real-time traffic analysis, suitable for networks needing superior threat intelligence.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers extensive threat intelligence and integration capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive threat visibility. In comparison, Morphisec emphasizes cost-effective zero-day prevention with lightweight architecture, attractive for businesses prioritizing simplicity and endpoint efficiency while minimizing performance impact.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has an initial setup cost that might be higher, while Morphisec offers a more straightforward setup process with potentially lower associated costs.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has an initial setup cost that might be higher, while Morphisec offers a more straightforward setup process with potentially lower associated costs.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery enhances security with real-time visibility and integration across multiple operating systems. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention excels in advanced threat interception but requires custom integrations for non-Palo systems, offering robust threat detection capabilities.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, making it a more budget-friendly option upfront.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, making it a more budget-friendly option upfront.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery EOL offers customization and integration capabilities essential for advanced threat detection and zero-day exploit management. In comparison, IRONSCALES excels in automated phishing prevention and response, utilizing AI and community-driven intelligence to enhance email security and management efficiency.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a high initial setup cost, whereas IRONSCALES offers a more affordable setup expense, highlighting significant differences in investment requirements for businesses.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a high initial setup cost, whereas IRONSCALES offers a more affordable setup expense, highlighting significant differences in investment requirements for businesses.
Fortinet FortiSandbox excels in integration and threat detection, fitting well into varied environments. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers robust threat intelligence and endpoint protection. FortiSandbox's pricing appeals, while Deep Discovery [EOL] provides comprehensive features justifying its higher cost.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers precise threat detection, attracting those who value historical market presence. In comparison, Flowmon provides advanced data visibility and robust analytics, appealing to those seeking modern deployment methods and comprehensive network protection for superior long-term value.
Trellix provides thorough threat detection, zero-day attack protection, and network visibility. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, despite reaching end-of-life, offers strong sandbox capabilities and integration with Trend Micro products, making it a strong choice for those prioritizing sandbox features.
Trellix Network Detection and Response has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL], making the former more suitable for organizations with greater budget flexibility.
Trellix Network Detection and Response has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL], making the former more suitable for organizations with greater budget flexibility.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers real-time traffic visibility and unique threat detection with custom sandboxing. In comparison, Arista NDR excels in network activity visibility and traffic analysis with its Security Knowledge Graph. Trend Micro targets comprehensive defense, while Arista emphasizes analysis capabilities.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a significant setup cost while Arista NDR is recognized for lower initial expenses, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment required for each.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a significant setup cost while Arista NDR is recognized for lower initial expenses, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment required for each.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery provides strong network traffic visibility and integration, making it ideal for organizations seeking enhanced threat detection. In comparison, Check Point IPS offers powerful security features with a comprehensive attack database, appealing to those requiring robust protection and global threat intelligence integration.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves a higher setup cost compared to Check Point IPS, which offers a more economical initial investment, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Check Point IPS in terms of installation expenses.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves a higher setup cost compared to Check Point IPS, which offers a more economical initial investment, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Check Point IPS in terms of installation expenses.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers real-time network visibility and threat intelligence, ideal for advanced threat detection and integration ease. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network focuses on zero-day threat prevention, extensive protocol coverage, and effective threat extraction, supporting hybrid deployment and comprehensive security integration.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves significant upfront setup costs, while Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more manageable initial investment, differentiating them in terms of affordability and implementation ease.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves significant upfront setup costs, while Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more manageable initial investment, differentiating them in terms of affordability and implementation ease.
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT excels in customer support and cost-effectiveness through its open-source adaptability. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] provides advanced threat protection capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing sophisticated threat defense despite higher initial costs and simpler deployment.
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL], which is no longer available, highlighting a significant pricing difference in initial deployment.
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL], which is no longer available, highlighting a significant pricing difference in initial deployment.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers robust integration and customization with real-time threat visibility, ideal for users needing flexible endpoint protection. In comparison, Trellix Intrusion Prevention System focuses on behavior analysis and application control, offering competitive pricing for advanced threat protection.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Trellix Intrusion Prevention System which offers a more economical approach with its lower setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between these security solutions.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Trellix Intrusion Prevention System which offers a more economical approach with its lower setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between these security solutions.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] excels in real-time analytics and threat detection, offering affordable pricing. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB provides robust web filtering with extensive database support, offering ease of deployment and advanced security features for comprehensive web activity protection.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves significant upfront setup costs, contrasting with Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, which offers a more straightforward initial setup.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves significant upfront setup costs, contrasting with Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, which offers a more straightforward initial setup.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL]'s affordability and supportive deployment attract cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Fortinet FortiNDR's advanced AI and broader integration options deliver superior threat detection, appealing to those seeking enhanced long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiNDR, which offers a more competitive pricing structure. These differences in setup costs reflect the varying approaches each solution takes regarding affordability and initial investment.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiNDR, which offers a more competitive pricing structure. These differences in setup costs reflect the varying approaches each solution takes regarding affordability and initial investment.
Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise offers strong file integrity and security configuration management, appealing for straightforward deployment and cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] excels in advanced threat detection, ideal for those prioritizing robust security with higher complexity and investment.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers advanced threat detection with cost-effective entry pricing. In comparison, Zscaler Cloud IPS excels with cloud-native architecture, superior scalability, and seamless deployment. Buyers may choose Deep Discovery for detailed security, while Zscaler appeals with comprehensive features and long-term ROI.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves a complex setup process with higher initial costs, while Zscaler Cloud IPS offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup experience.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves a complex setup process with higher initial costs, while Zscaler Cloud IPS offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup experience.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers robust sandboxing and threat intelligence, ideal for enterprises needing deep integration with Trend Micro solutions. In comparison, Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is favored for its comprehensive threat management, particularly suited for organizations requiring strong persistence threat mitigation capabilities.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] typically requires a more substantial setup cost, whereas Trellix Advanced Threat Defense often presents a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in upfront financial commitment between these two advanced threat protecti...
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] typically requires a more substantial setup cost, whereas Trellix Advanced Threat Defense often presents a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in upfront financial commitment between these two advanced threat protecti...
Trend Micro Deep Discovery offers advanced threat detection with strong pricing and support. In comparison, Sangfor Cyber Command excels with integrated threat intelligence and real-time adaptive responses. Tech buyers choosing Trend Micro value stability and support, while those opting for Sangfor seek modern deployment and efficiency.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers a straightforward setup, while Sangfor Cyber Command includes a more comprehensive setup cost. Users should consider the initial investment differences when comparing these cybersecurity solutions.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] offers a straightforward setup, while Sangfor Cyber Command includes a more comprehensive setup cost. Users should consider the initial investment differences when comparing these cybersecurity solutions.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] excels in threat detection and pricing benefits. In comparison, Gatewatcher offers advanced machine learning and cloud-friendly deployment, meeting dynamic needs. Trend Micro attracts cost-conscious buyers; Gatewatcher appeals to those seeking superior capabilities with higher ROI.
Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] excels in advanced threat detection and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those prioritizing budget and support. In comparison, Huawei Network Intelligent Protection offers a comprehensive feature set and flexible deployment, attracting buyers seeking extensive security analytics and cloud integration.
Ziften Zenith is ideal for those seeking cost-effective and easy deployment with excellent endpoint management. In comparison, Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] appeals to buyers prioritizing advanced threat detection and features, offering greater long-term value despite higher initial costs and complex setup.
Ziften Zenith has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves a more complex initial investment. Analyze these distinct setup expenses when considering each solution for your security needs.
Ziften Zenith has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] involves a more complex initial investment. Analyze these distinct setup expenses when considering each solution for your security needs.
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/2wuq6mq8liciuy8jm6aqj4dp5bgm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/2w272d7zf0t624rmzge9zoruvro8.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/lz0x0f3gl53lde64phui6f8ndbwn.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/9m6mfolh5h8plvyy7f9et25cm3yx.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/qmyg8zosfjtbfwv71b7qn2f4y8li.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/0dra2w8zbx5vrvwmhkdswx9l90ys.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/27Ts9mDsxXV75vDpojWxHTZK.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/jtn756w7mm1vpr320w4a61p118gg.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/0jgnfc0g3a2r9a4zaxo45cdfwjs3.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/TBedx7qrAPWnPwsTL5YUSU92.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/i9vabqnyzer8y1ba3p1vw6xmk1dt.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/flt8juuqqxdz1gjctfbhmpf6sa12.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/yq4AkUBxN1r2iKWsE66CeUuu.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/lm1rirjh0wrsnahydvsp0knfyqel.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/xnj3c8esgd51x6izz49frlkw33xy.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/868zzhick8fwlmerh7c6m39anj12.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/5nhe5dngiwg0uy24uoctsuoxsz7r.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/ohxyatscfqmlcegdjc8p9hig6dbz.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/717zfsg01037t8l9p3ltnxbo324s.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/l9s6u31dmx2zilhhpomyvzs1tlz1.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/ox43X8ndQcQ4kRrn222xSSBK.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Trend Micro Deep Discovery [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_60/2kCdS2roLyd3a2ryASbWTMaz.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
