Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo

Top 10 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Alternatives

Vendor: Trellix
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trellix Endpoint Security Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, automated response capabilities, and seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring comprehensive protection against sophisticated cyber threats and enhancing organizations' overall security posture.

Trellix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trellix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in real-time threat detection and compatibility with cloud environments, beneficial for rapid deployment and comprehensive customer service. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security offers centralized management, versatile deployment for complex needs, and cost-effectiveness for enterprises seeking all-encompassing solutions.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs minimal setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon is more expensive to implement. CrowdStrike offers advanced threat detection, contrasting Trellix's focus on essential security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs minimal setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon is more expensive to implement. CrowdStrike offers advanced threat detection, contrasting Trellix's focus on essential security features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Treliix offers extensive features like data encryption and centralized management, appealing to organizations needing robust endpoint protection. In comparison, Wazuh, with its open-source nature, provides cost efficiency and integration flexibility, ideal for those prioritizing budget and customizable cybersecurity solutions.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Wazuh Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process but involves higher initial costs, whereas Wazuh provides a more cost-effective setup with potentially additional complexity. This highlights Trellix's user-friendliness against Wazuh's affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process but involves higher initial costs, whereas Wazuh provides a more cost-effective setup with potentially additional complexity. This highlights Trellix's user-friendliness against Wazuh's affordability.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform integrates threat protection and forensic capabilities, suitable for complex customization. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless Windows integration and real-time protection. Trellix faces configuration challenges, while Microsoft Defender requires better third-party integration.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting a key differentiation in pricing strategy between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting a key differentiation in pricing strategy between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers centralized management and scalability. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes threat intelligence and integration. Trellix is noted for cost-effectiveness, while Fortinet excels in competitive pricing and extensive threat detection capabilities. Each solution suits different security and budget priorities.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more flexible setup option, highlighting distinct pricing models.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more flexible setup option, highlighting distinct pricing models.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security integrates system management with features like McAfee Data Loss Prevention and encryption for IT infrastructure. In comparison, Darktrace offers AI-driven threat detection learning network behaviors for proactive security, ideal for real-time insights and minimal intervention in threat responses.
Download Darktrace vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a lower setup cost, while Darktrace includes a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a lower setup cost, while Darktrace includes a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Trellix offers centralized management for ease of administration and hybrid deployments. In comparison, SentinelOne provides a competitive edge with its rollback feature for ransomware protection and excels in public cloud deployment. Trellix has customizable features, while SentinelOne ensures compelling ROI with competitive pricing.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is noted for having a higher setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is noted for having a higher setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a more budget-friendly option.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers robust integration and scalability for comprehensive threat management. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides advanced endpoint defense with adaptable customization. QRadar is ideal for large enterprises with complex needs, while Trellix suits users prioritizing cost-effective endpoint protection.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
IBM Security QRadar typically incurs higher setup costs, contrasting with Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, which is known for its more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar typically incurs higher setup costs, contrasting with Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, which is known for its more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix offers integrated threat detection ideal for proactive businesses. In comparison, HP Wolf uses virtualization to isolate threats, appealing to those valuing data integrity. Trellix's cost is attractive, while HP Wolf's security features justify higher initial expenses.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is competitive, providing extensive features at a reasonable price, while HP Wolf Security requires a higher initial investment, offering robust protection solutions but at a greater expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is competitive, providing extensive features at a reasonable price, while HP Wolf Security requires a higher initial investment, offering robust protection solutions but at a greater expense.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security focuses on comprehensive endpoint management with central controls and diverse security tools. In comparison, Cortex XDR emphasizes advanced threat detection using AI, making it suited for organizations facing zero-day threats. Trellix is cost-effective, whereas Cortex XDR offers high-security value with a higher price.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers lower setup costs, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks may require higher initial investment but delivers advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers lower setup costs, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks may require higher initial investment but delivers advanced capabilities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers centralized management and ease of integration with a flexible dashboard. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR provides seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for those seeking a holistic security solution across Windows and Microsoft 365 environments.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers an affordable setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR tends to have a higher initial outlay.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers an affordable setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR tends to have a higher initial outlay.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive features and strong customer support, making it ideal for secure environments. In comparison, Elastic Security provides flexibility and cost-effectiveness through its open-source model, appealing to businesses seeking customization and control. Both offer strong ROI, yet serve different needs.
Download Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform typically incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform typically incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels with robust central management and comprehensive features, ideal for seamless updates. In comparison, Tanium offers powerful threat hunting and real-time monitoring. Trellix is cost-effective for larger setups, while Tanium's efficiency justifies higher upfront costs for complex environments.
Download Tanium vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs minimal setup costs compared to Tanium, which has higher setup fees. This cost difference highlights a key consideration for organizations evaluating these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs minimal setup costs compared to Tanium, which has higher setup fees. This cost difference highlights a key consideration for organizations evaluating these solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
Trellix offers robust centralized management and threat prevention. In comparison, Huntress excels with 24/7 SOC support and integration with Microsoft Defender. Trellix targets those needing strong encryption and detailed reporting, while Huntress appeals with proactive threat detection and cost-effective managed services.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has an initial setup cost that can be significant, whereas Huntress Managed EDR offers a more straightforward and cost-effective setup process, highlighting a difference in ease of deployment and initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has an initial setup cost that can be significant, whereas Huntress Managed EDR offers a more straightforward and cost-effective setup process, highlighting a difference in ease of deployment and initial expenses.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Trellix offers advanced threat detection, centralized management, and enterprise-grade tools suitable for large-scale deployments. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox combines scalable throughput with simplicity and integrated network management, providing a comprehensive solution for small to medium businesses needing robust layered security.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are relatively high compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for users seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are relatively high compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for users seeking cost-effective solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Trellix provides a comprehensive security solution with features like Data Loss Prevention and ePolicy Orchestrator but needs improvements in resource efficiency and integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient excels in VPN capabilities and integration but can improve multi-factor authentication support.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform includes a higher setup cost with comprehensive features, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more affordable initial setup with essential capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform includes a higher setup cost with comprehensive features, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more affordable initial setup with essential capabilities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in threat protection and centralized management, ideal for organizations prioritizing security customization. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers robust analytics and AI with broad integration, suitable for businesses seeking comprehensive visibility across multiple environments. Both cater to different organizational needs effectively.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Vision One Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process, while Trend Vision One presents a higher initial cost. The pricing and setup differences highlight distinct approaches to onboarding in these security solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process, while Trend Vision One presents a higher initial cost. The pricing and setup differences highlight distinct approaches to onboarding in these security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust protection with features like antivirus and firewall across multiple environments. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security focuses on threat intelligence and cloud access. Symantec provides comprehensive protection, while Trellix excels in advanced threat prevention and integration capabilities.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Symantec Endpoint Security involves a moderate setup cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security Platform demands a higher initial investment. The pricing contrasts highlight significant differences in up-front expenses, impacting budget considerations for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security involves a moderate setup cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security Platform demands a higher initial investment. The pricing contrasts highlight significant differences in up-front expenses, impacting budget considerations for organizations.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform focuses on robust encryption and comprehensive management, appealing to those valuing device compatibility. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint emphasizes advanced threat emulation and anti-ransomware features, making it suitable for environments prioritizing real-time threat detection with sophisticated security needs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup cost is low, facilitating easy deployment, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint entails a higher setup investment, indicating a robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup cost is low, facilitating easy deployment, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint entails a higher setup investment, indicating a robust feature set.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in advanced threat management, making it ideal for complex enterprise environments. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers cost-effective antivirus solutions, suitable for small to medium businesses seeking robust yet affordable protection.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is known for a more budget-friendly setup cost, showcasing a clear difference in their initial financial requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is known for a more budget-friendly setup cost, showcasing a clear difference in their initial financial requirements.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET offers a lightweight solution ideal for resource-limited environments. In comparison, Trellix provides comprehensive security features like DLP. ESET is more affordable and easy to deploy, while Trellix, despite higher costs, offers extensive features that may justify the investment.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower initial setup costs compared to Trellix Endpoint Security Platform. Despite this, Trellix provides more comprehensive security features that could justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower initial setup costs compared to Trellix Endpoint Security Platform. Despite this, Trellix provides more comprehensive security features that could justify its higher setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive features with high customizability, appealing for its advanced threat prevention. In comparison, BigFix excels in endpoint management, providing strong patch management. Trellix suits varied deployments, while BigFix is noted for strong support and reliable service in diverse environments.
Download BigFix vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has an affordable setup cost, while BigFix has a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has an affordable setup cost, while BigFix has a higher setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is notable for robust DLP and encryption with efficient central management via ePolicy Orchestrator. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers strong threat prevention and behavior monitoring with advanced machine learning for adaptable protection, appealing for its integration capabilities.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a moderate setup cost, offering cost-effective protection, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher setup cost, providing extensive features. The primary difference lies in the balance between price and offered functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a moderate setup cost, offering cost-effective protection, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher setup cost, providing extensive features. The primary difference lies in the balance between price and offered functionalities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust management and protection with flexible deployment options, ideal for enterprises seeking comprehensive security. In comparison, Forescout Platform excels in network visibility and access control, catering to those needing detailed device management and extensive integration capabilities.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a low setup cost, while Forescout Platform presents a higher initial investment requirement.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a low setup cost, while Forescout Platform presents a higher initial investment requirement.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix excels in endpoint security with protection against malware and ransomware, ideal for large deployments needing centralized management. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR emphasizes threat detection and user behavior analytics, suitable for organizations requiring comprehensive SIEM capabilities with strong integration and reporting features.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which has a more straightforward and cost-effective deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which has a more straightforward and cost-effective deployment process.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix offers robust central management with ePolicy Orchestrator, ideal for enterprises needing seamless integration. In comparison, Cynet's comprehensive features like autonomous breach protection and user behavior analysis appeal to those prioritizing threat hunting and straightforward deployment in a single-pane view.
Download Cynet vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform features a higher setup cost compared to Cynet's solution, which offers more competitive pricing. The price difference significantly impacts the decision for budget-conscious businesses looking for effective endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform features a higher setup cost compared to Cynet's solution, which offers more competitive pricing. The price difference significantly impacts the decision for budget-conscious businesses looking for effective endpoint security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Trellix offers comprehensive threat detection and unified management, appealing to those seeking extensive customization. In comparison, Intercept X provides a streamlined cloud platform with machine learning and anti-ransomware, ideal for businesses prioritizing ease of use and efficient, integrated security.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a significant setup investment, while Intercept X Endpoint offers a more budget-friendly initial cost. Trellix provides robust protection features; Intercept X stands out for user-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a significant setup investment, while Intercept X Endpoint offers a more budget-friendly initial cost. Trellix provides robust protection features; Intercept X stands out for user-friendly implementation.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust central management, integration, and encryption, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive security. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in patch management and malware detection, ideal for businesses seeking advanced control and protection across Windows and Linux systems.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in central management and adaptability, offering enterprise-grade features for complex environments. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security's ease of use and resource efficiency make it appealing for users seeking comprehensive protection with minimal deployment complexity.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup for users.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in integrated threat prevention and data loss prevention, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers strong integration with Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Trellix may appeal to those needing robust encryption, whereas Microsoft Defender benefits businesses fully engaged with Microsoft services.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews highlight a moderately priced setup, while Microsoft Defender for Business is praised for its low setup cost. Trellix offers a more comprehensive feature set, while Microsoft Defender is seen as cost-effective.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews highlight a moderately priced setup, while Microsoft Defender for Business is praised for its low setup cost. Trellix offers a more comprehensive feature set, while Microsoft Defender is seen as cost-effective.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Trellix offers a centralized management suite with diverse security features, optimizing IT operations. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black emphasizes behavior analytics and quick responses, benefiting threat hunting. Trellix is more adaptable across environments, while VMware Carbon Black provides strong cloud deployment with advanced intelligence.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
The setup cost for Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is typically higher compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which offers more budget-friendly options. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is typically higher compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which offers more budget-friendly options. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures between the two security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix is favored for its comprehensive management and seamless integration, appealing to those seeking extensive endpoint functionalities. In comparison, Bitdefender, known for its user-friendliness, provides strong anti-malware capabilities, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing ease of use and cost efficiency.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform often has a higher setup cost than Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, which is known for its more competitive pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform often has a higher setup cost than Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, which is known for its more competitive pricing structure.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers comprehensive security with McAfee and FireEye integration, excelling in data protection. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates into Cisco's ecosystem, providing real-time threat intelligence. Trellix is affordable, while Cisco's competitive pricing aligns with robust ecosystem benefits.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a relatively straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is noted for potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a relatively straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is noted for potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in advanced threat detection and is favored by larger organizations for its comprehensive integration and responsive support. In comparison, Norton Small Business, with its robust antivirus and cloud features, appeals to small businesses seeking strong ROI and simplicity.
Download Norton Small Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Norton Small Business, making it a more budget-friendly option for companies looking to cut initial expenses on cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Norton Small Business, making it a more budget-friendly option for companies looking to cut initial expenses on cybersecurity solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in advanced threat detection with customizable options. In comparison, Malwarebytes Teams is user-friendly and reliable for simpler environments. Trellix offers on-premises deployment flexibility, whereas Malwarebytes provides cloud ease. Trellix's extensive features justify its price; Malwarebytes offers competitive value.
Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more budget-friendly option. Trellix focuses on comprehensive security features, whereas Malwarebytes provides straightforward, easy-to-deploy protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more budget-friendly option. Trellix focuses on comprehensive security features, whereas Malwarebytes provides straightforward, easy-to-deploy protection.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5
Trellix offers a robust security suite with centralized management ideal for comprehensive enterprise needs, including encryption and antivirus. In comparison, Cybereason provides lightweight operation and agile threat response, appealing for those prioritizing efficient threat detection over management complexity.
Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response provides a more straightforward pricing structure, highlighting significant differences in implementation expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response provides a more straightforward pricing structure, highlighting significant differences in implementation expenses between the two solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
Trellix offers comprehensive management and AI-driven analytics for large environments, which may appeal to organizations needing robust firewall capabilities. In comparison, ThreatLocker emphasizes zero-trust strategies with allowlisting and application control, making it suitable for those focusing on unauthorized software prevention.
Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a moderate setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform features a cost-effective setup. This highlights a cost advantage for ThreatLocker for businesses seeking initial deployment savings.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a moderate setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform features a cost-effective setup. This highlights a cost advantage for ThreatLocker for businesses seeking initial deployment savings.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is ideal for those seeking comprehensive protection with real-time intelligence and automated responses. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR attracts with AI-driven analytics and unified visibility, appealing to those prioritizing advanced threat detection and integration in complex environments.
Download Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform may have variable setup costs based on deployment options, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a simplified, potentially lower-cost setup due to its streamlined integration process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform may have variable setup costs based on deployment options, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a simplified, potentially lower-cost setup due to its streamlined integration process.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Trellix excels in centralized management and integration, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Trend Micro focuses on ease of management with cloud capabilities. Tech buyers might choose Trellix for its comprehensive control or Trend Micro for its cost-effectiveness and consistent support.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a setup cost that users find manageable, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites reports higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a setup cost that users find manageable, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites reports higher initial costs.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in centralized management and strong security features, making it easy to deploy across various environments. In comparison, Digital Guardian offers advanced threat detection and robust data classification, ideal for organizations prioritizing data protection and compliance within diverse IT infrastructures.
Download Digital Guardian vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a substantial initial setup cost, whereas Digital Guardian offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a substantial initial setup cost, whereas Digital Guardian offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint offers centralized management and robust threat prevention, ideal for enterprises needing strong control and reporting. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance excels with lightweight AI-driven threat detection and minimal system impact, appealing to those prioritizing resource efficiency.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a moderate setup cost, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a lower setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a moderate setup cost, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a lower setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in advanced data loss prevention and threat detection with centralized management. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security is cost-effective with essential antivirus features for straightforward protection, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking basic security solutions.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, offering advanced features, while Seqrite Endpoint Security is more budget-friendly with basic functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, offering advanced features, while Seqrite Endpoint Security is more budget-friendly with basic functionalities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix stands out for its central management, simplifying operations across varied environments and supporting flexible deployments. In comparison, NetWitness emphasizes robust customer support and flexible pricing, ideal for tech buyers needing high-level threat detection and responsiveness.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires significant upfront investment, while NetWitness NDR offers a more flexible setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires significant upfront investment, while NetWitness NDR offers a more flexible setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers superior integration and management, appealing to users favoring streamlined ecosystems. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert provides robust security and simplicity, attracting buyers who prioritize straightforward threat protection and easy management across diverse environments.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup is costly, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup is costly, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Trellix offers extensive enterprise security features with centralized management and integration, addressing complex deployment needs. In comparison, Morphisec emphasizes lightweight, signature-less protection and rapid integration, catering to those seeking streamlined deployment with effective prevention capabilities against sophisticated threats.
Download Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are higher but provide extensive customization, while Morphisec offers a more affordable setup with straightforward implementation, highlighting cost differences and setup complexity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are higher but provide extensive customization, while Morphisec offers a more affordable setup with straightforward implementation, highlighting cost differences and setup complexity between the two solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform prioritizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness, ideal for quick deployment and seamless integration. In comparison, Fidelis Elevate's advanced threat detection attracts enterprises seeking in-depth analytics and enhanced security, justifying its higher price for those needing comprehensive protection.
Download Fidelis Elevate vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is competitive, while Fidelis Elevate requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is competitive, while Fidelis Elevate requires a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Trellix offers robust threat intelligence and flexible policy management for budget-conscious buyers focused on efficient malware detection. In comparison, Mandiant Advantage is ideal for those requiring advanced threat hunting, comprehensive incident response tools, and proactive support despite its higher initial investment.
Download Mandiant Advantage vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is highlighted as higher than Mandiant Advantage, which is noted for its competitive pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is highlighted as higher than Mandiant Advantage, which is noted for its competitive pricing.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust centralized management with comprehensive solutions, ideal for organizations needing extensive management features. In comparison, Deep Instinct Prevention Platform focuses on predictive threat modeling with minimal resource consumption, appealing to those prioritizing efficiency and simplicity.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires lower setup cost while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform demands a more significant upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires lower setup cost while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform demands a more significant upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in initial financial commitment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides extensive threat detection and response with cutting-edge analytics, ideal for companies needing advanced features. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers seamless integration and cost-effective deployment, appealing to those seeking efficient management with immediate ROI benefits.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves higher initial setup costs, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves higher initial setup costs, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
Trellix offers strong integration capabilities and adaptive protection for businesses seeking deep deployment assistance, while ESET emphasizes advanced threat hunting and seamless initial setup. In comparison, ESET features predictable pricing for immediate ROI, whereas Trellix provides flexible pricing for scalability-focused organizations.
Download ESET EDR/XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup cost is competitive, offering a robust security suite, while ESET EDR/XDR presents an affordable option with a focus on efficient threat detection.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup cost is competitive, offering a robust security suite, while ESET EDR/XDR presents an affordable option with a focus on efficient threat detection.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Kaspersky Total Security
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers centralized management with high-level encryption and advanced threat detection, ideal for security-focused buyers. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security provides robust antivirus solutions with continuous updates, appealing to those prioritizing a comprehensive, reliable protection package.
Download Kaspersky Total Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs higher setup costs, offering comprehensive protection features, while Kaspersky Total Security is more budget-friendly with initial setup, focusing on user-friendly installation and effective security.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs higher setup costs, offering comprehensive protection features, while Kaspersky Total Security is more budget-friendly with initial setup, focusing on user-friendly installation and effective security.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)