Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PyCharm Logo

PyCharm Reviews

Vendor: JetBrains
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

What is PyCharm?

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

Get the Static Code Analysis Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about PyCharm, OpenText Static Application Security Testing and more!
PyCharm is the #7 ranked solution in top Static Code Analysis solutions. PeerSpot users give PyCharm an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. PyCharm is most commonly compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing: PyCharm vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing.
Buyer's Guide
Static Code Analysis
August 2025
Get the category report
Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Featured PyCharm reviews

Read more reviews

PyCharm mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of PyCharm in the Static Code Analysis category stands at 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Code Analysis Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
PyCharm0.6%
Veracode22.1%
Checkmarx One14.6%
Other62.699999999999996%
Static Code Analysis
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

PyCharm excels with comprehensive debugging, smart code analysis, and integration with source control. Users value its intuitive environment, code completion, and syntax highlighting. It supports frameworks like Django and Flask, offers efficient unit testing, and AI-powered features for code refactoring. The IDE facilitates package installation, virtual environment management, and GitHub integration. Users appreciate error detection, hints for coding issues, and efficient code structure management, enhancing productivity in complex projects. PyCharm fits well with JetBrains' ecosystem.
  • "PyCharm is saving me time and money in general."
  • "PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities."
  • "The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

Room for Improvement

PyCharm users suggest improvements in several areas. Integration with Python Notebooks and OpenCV needs enhancement. Memory and system resource usage should be reduced as it affects performance, especially on laptops. Direct connections with tools like GitLab would be valuable and navigation could be enhanced for better user experience. The price for the professional edition is high, and broader language support along with a community edition would increase accessibility and adoption.
  • "The refactor facility in PyCharm is not on par with the refactor facility in IntelliJ. It could be improved since IntelliJ offers many more options for refactoring."
  • "One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."
  • "Customizing the tool can make it complicated."

Pricing

Enterprise buyers evaluating PyCharm find the pricing reasonable with free and licensed options. The Community edition is free, while the Professional edition includes a fee. Users appreciate access to all JetBrains IDEs for approximately $30 per month, viewed as worthwhile despite being slightly more expensive than some competitors. Additionally, many add-ons or packages are available. Users rate the pricing highly, citing affordability and comprehensive access to multiple development tools, enhancing productivity.
  • "I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • "The community edition is free, which is good."

Popular Use Cases

Users primarily utilize PyCharm for Python code development and optimization of algorithms in data science, machine learning, and complex software projects. It serves various purposes including data processing, debugging, and testing. PyCharm supports frameworks like Django and Flask and is employed for developing back-end applications and microservices. Teams often use it alongside other tools such as Grafana and Pylint, and some switch between PyCharm and Visual Studio depending on their specific tasks.

Service and Support

Many users have not needed to contact PyCharm support due to its reliable performance. Those who have interacted report a mix of experiences, with some noting helpful assistance and others facing delays or lack of response. Student account verification received quick attention. In comparison to other tools like Visual Studio and Jupyter Notebook, preferences vary based on specific tasks. Some users rely on the free version without needing support interaction.

Deployment

Users found PyCharm’s initial setup straightforward and easy, with many able to start within minutes. Some reiterated its simplicity by following tutorials or clicking through basic options. A few mentioned a slightly longer time for those unfamiliar with the interface. Most users chose not to explore cloud deployment, focusing on on-premises or desktop versions. Logging in with GitHub facilitated syncing settings, and users appreciated the ability to customize while noting potential complexity in deeper configurations.

Scalability

Users find PyCharm scalable and valuable, with no performance issues on large projects. Recommended for teams working with Python, PyCharm is utilized by small and medium-sized groups, often around 10-15 members. However, expanding licenses can be challenging due to cost. Despite this, its efficiency in handling workflow is appreciated. Users rate its scalability reasonably, acknowledging its capability, yet note potential budget concerns with license expansion.

Stability

Users generally rate PyCharm favorably for its stability, with many placing it between seven and ten out of ten. It handles resources well, though some note it can be resource-heavy. Most users have not experienced problems, and bugs are resolved swiftly. There is a preference for using stable versions for production, with some using the latest versions for testing. The integration features like Docker support are appreciated, contributing positively to stability remarks.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Static Code Analysis Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Compare PyCharm with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about PyCharm

Related questions

  • 48
What is the difference between SAST and SCA tools?
  • 4
When evaluating Static Code Analysis Software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 48
Differences between Black Duck & Veracode
  • 16
What is your recommended static code analysis tool for JavaScript and C/C++?
  • 4
Is there an automated way to validate and enforce requirements for application security when creating components, and cloud environments?
  • 8
Why is Static Code Analysis important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Static Code Analysis

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs PyCharm Logo
OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs PyCharm
See all alternatives
 
PyCharm Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Consultant at Mark Gurry & Associates4.5I use PyCharm for rapid prototyping mainly in GenAI, appreciating its support for frameworks like Django and Flask, and intelligent features like code completion. Though its refactoring needs improvement compared to IntelliJ, it saves me time and money overall.
Director at Freelance4.5I use PyCharm for writing quantitative libraries, data manipulation tools, and Django applications. Its unit testing integration is excellent, enhancing productivity. However, it uses heavy resources. I switched from Vim and found PyCharm preferable to Visual Studio Code for consistency.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.0I found PyCharm stable and feature-rich, but its high cost limits adoption in our team, which prefers the free Visual Studio. The setup was easy, though broader usage would benefit from a free community edition like IntelliJ's.
Vice President at E-Cell Ramaiah4.0I use PyCharm for running, testing, and debugging code. It integrates well with GitHub, enhancing coding efficiency with features like documentation previews. However, it consumes significant memory, reducing laptop battery life, making alternatives like Visual Studio Code preferable for smaller projects.
Technical lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0I use PyCharm for software development, especially Python development across frameworks like Django and Flask. It offers excellent IDE features, source control integration, and AI-powered code completion, but it can be memory-intensive if too many files are open.
Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie5.0I use PyCharm for developing complex software projects with robotic operating systems. It offers a user-friendly environment and supports robotics tools, though it lacks some OpenCV features. More support for ROS development would enhance my experience further.
Developer at ExcaliburFRC4.5I find PyCharm's syntax highlighting to be excellent and highly customizable, although the navigation could be improved. I haven't used any other solutions or cloud providers, so I cannot compare the return on investment with alternatives.
Senior Project Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We use PyCharm for Python development due to its valuable feature of providing coding hints, which aids in faster, error-free coding. However, its heavy resource usage and lack of direct integration with tools like GitLab need improvement.