Mend.io vs PyCharm comparison

Mend.io and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Mend.io is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.3, while JetBrains is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Mend.io holds a 9.2% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Mend.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Mend.io

Read 30 Mend.io reviews

1,705 Views
1,155 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PyCharm

Read 11 PyCharm reviews

146 Views
37 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mend.io

PyCharm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Mend.io and PyCharm compete in software development tools, with a focus on security and coding environments. Mend.io tends to lead in open-source dependency management and security automation, while PyCharm shines in Python development and integrated coding features.

Features: Mend.io is strong in scanning and managing open-source dependencies, offering vulnerability detection and license management with automated processes for comprehensive governance. PyCharm is known for its robust features, including integrated code analysis, advanced debugging capabilities, and exceptional support for Python development, enhancing the ease of coding.

Room for Improvement: Mend.io could improve notifications, implement advanced role management, enhance UI, and expand browser compatibility and language support. PyCharm needs to optimize memory usage, offer better pricing options, and improve integration with workflow products, along with expanding language support and system optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mend.io supports flexible deployment options such as public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering excellent customer service with proactive support. PyCharm primarily provides on-premises deployment, offering stability and control, but limited cloud flexibility. Customer service is reliable but not as emphasized over technical features.

Pricing and ROI: Mend.io is cost-effective for larger organizations due to its robust feature set and offers significant ROI by automating vulnerability management and ensuring software security. PyCharm provides a free community edition and an affordable professional version, making it appealing for Python developers. Mend.io’s pricing can be challenging for small startups, while PyCharm's tiered pricing offers broader accessibility, enhancing ROI for both products.

To learn more, read our detailed Mend.io vs. PyCharm Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mend.io vs. PyCharm

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mend.io

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (18th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

PyCharm

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Mend.io is 9.2%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PyCharm is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Enables smooth management of vulnerabilities and promotes a shift towards a culture of security

We have witnessed Mend.io for its high stability, consistently living up to our expectations in terms of performance and reliability. Our developers have reported very few issues and almost minimal to zero downtime, which is a critical factor for our organization to rely on Mend SCA to secure our applications. We didn't experience any major issues in the stability of the product. This level of dependability is crucial for our hundreds of development teams that need to maintain continuous integration and deployment processes without interruptions. We realize the solution's architecture is designed to support a wide range of use cases, making it suitable for organizations of varying sizes and complexities. As a SaaS (Software as a Service) offering, Mend.io eliminates the need for physical server management, which further contributes to its stability. Users can access the platform without worrying about hardware failures or maintenance issues that can affect on-premises solutions. Moreover, Mend.io's integration capabilities with existing workflows—including IDEs, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines—enhance its stability by providing a seamless user experience. This integration allows teams to incorporate security scanning into their development processes without significant disruptions, which is often a challenge with less stable solutions. Feedback from our developers and architects highlights the tool's effectiveness in reducing open-source software vulnerabilities while maintaining a streamlined development lifecycle. Our organization have experienced improved code quality and faster incident response times as a result of using Mend.io. The platform's intuitive dashboard and management views are also praised by our developers for their usability, contributing to a positive user experience. In short, Mend.io stands out as a dependable and reliable solution in the realm of software composition analysis. Its high stability, combined with robust integration capabilities and user-friendly features, makes it an excellent choice for organizations seeking to enhance their security posture while minimizing operational disruptions.

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

Convenient to use and surely increases the effectiveness of software development

The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package. Open CV is used to develop software that involves computer vision tasks. It seems the solution is not fully updated to use the latest PyCharm packages. I would like even more support toward robotics-related software tools. For example, support of ROS, ROS 1, and ROS 2 development would ensure that I continue to use the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting capability gives us the option to generate an open-source license report in a single click, which gets all copyright and license information, including dependencies."

"It gives us full visibility into what we're using, what needs to be updated, and what's vulnerable, which helps us make better decisions."

"The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulnerability, we usually get a dedicated email from our R&D team saying that this particular vulnerability has been exploited in the world, and we should definitely check our project for this and take corrective actions."

"The inventory management as well as the ability to identify security vulnerabilities has been the most valuable for our business."

"Our dev team uses the fix suggestions feature to quickly find the best path for remediation."

"The results and the dashboard they provide are good."

"WhiteSource is unique in the scanning of open-source licenses. Additionally, the vulnerabilities aspect of the solution is a benefit. We don't use WhiteSource in the whole organization, but we use it for some projects. There we receive a sense of the vulnerabilities of the open-source components, which improves our security work. The reports are automated which is useful."

"I am the organizational deployment administrator for this tool, and I, along with other users in our company, especially the security team, appreciate the solution for several reasons. The UI is excellent, and scanning for security threats fits well into our workflow."

More Mend.io pros

"It is an excellent, fully integrated IDE with smart code analysis capability and a built-in debugger. It is a fantastic tool."

"We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries."

"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."

"The recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool."

"The solution has a great debugging feature."

"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."

"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."

More PyCharm pros

Cons

"Needs better ACL and more role definitions. This product could be used by large organisations and it definitely needs a better role/action model."

"At times, the latency of getting items out of the findings after they're remediated is higher than it should be."

"I would like to have an additional compliance pack. Currently, it does not have anything for the CIS framework or the NIST framework. If we directly run a scan, and it is under the CIS framework, we can directly tell the auditor that this product is now CIS compliant."

"On the reporting side, they could make some improvements. They are making the reports better and better, but sometimes it takes a lot of time to generate a report for our entire organization."

"It would be nice to have a better way to realize its full potential and translate it within the UI or during onboarding."

"I would like to see the static analysis included with the open-source version."

"Some detected libraries do not specify a location of where in the source they were matched from, which is something that should be enhanced to enable quicker troubleshooting."

"They're working on a UI refresh. That's probably been one of the pain points for us as it feels like a really old application."

More Mend.io cons

"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."

"They should improve the product's interactiveness."

"There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow."

"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."

"The navigation can be better."

"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."

"Customizing the tool can make it complicated."

"One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."

More PyCharm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps."

"This is an expensive solution."

"As we were using an SaaS-based service, the solution must be scalable, although my understanding is that this is based on the licensing model one is using."

"We are paying a lot of money to use WhiteSource. In our company, it is not easy to argue that it is worth the price. "

"The solution involves a yearly licensing fee."

"When comparing the price of WhiteSource to the competition it is priced well. The cost for 50 users is approximately $18,000 annually."

"Pricing is competitive."

"Its pricing model is per developer. It depends on the number of developers in the company. The license is for a minimum of 20 developers. So, even if you are a small startup with less than 10 developers, you have to buy a license for 20 developers on a yearly subscription, which makes it quite expensive for startup customers. I provide consultation to startup accelerators. They're small at the beginning, and only once they grow to 20 developers, they can afford this tool. As a result, WhiteSource is missing this target audience. Their licensing is not flexible."

More Mend.io pricing and cost advice

"The community edition is free, which is good."

"The price is reasonable."

"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."

"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."

"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?

We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mend.io?

The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulner...

See all answers

What do you like most about PyCharm?

The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PyCharm?

One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PyCharm?

I have used PyCharm ( /products/pycharm-reviews ) to write quantitative libraries, data manipulation tools, Django back-end applications, and microservices.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Mend.io

Compared 23% of the time

Black Duck vs Mend.io

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs Mend.io

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Dependabot vs Mend.io

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs Mend.io

Compared 7% of the time

More Mend.io Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mend.io

April 2025

Download Mend.io product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

March 2025

Download PyCharm product report

Also Known As

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST

No data available

Overview

Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.

Mend.io Features

Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Vulnerability analysis
Automated remediation
Seamless integration
Business prioritization
Limitless scalability
Intuitive interface
Language support
Integration
Continuous monitoring
Remediation suggestions
Customization

Mend.io Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Easy to use: The Mend.io platform is very user-friendly and easy to set up.

Third-party libraries: The solution eases the process of keeping track of all the used third-party dependencies within a product. It not only scans for the pure occurrence (also transitively) but also takes care of licenses and vulnerabilities.

Static code analysis: With Mend.io’s static code analysis, you can quickly identify security weaknesses in custom code across desktop, web, and mobile applications.

Broad support: Mend.io provides 27 different programming languages and various programming frameworks.

Easy integration: Mend.io makes integration very easy with existing DevOps environments and CI/CD pipelines so developers don’t need to manually configure or trigger the scan.

Ultra-fast scanning engine: The solution’s scanning engine generates results up to ten times faster than legacy SAST solutions.

Unified developer experience: Mend.io has a unified developer experience inside the code repository that shows side-by-side security alerts and remediation suggestions for custom code and open-source code.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.

Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”

PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”

An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”

Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."

Mend.io

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Mend.io vs. PyCharm

April 2025

Free Report: Mend.io vs. PyCharm

Find out what your peers are saying about Mend.io vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mend.io vs. PyCharm report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.