We performed a comparison between PyCharm and ReShaper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, OpenText, JetBrains and others in Static Code Analysis."The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."
"The solution has a great debugging feature."
"It is an excellent, fully integrated IDE with smart code analysis capability and a built-in debugger. It is a fantastic tool."
"The best feature of PyCharm is that it gives you hints whenever it detects any issues while you are coding. This is important because it helps us code faster and without any errors."
"The recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool."
"Good syntax highlighting and very it's very customizable."
"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."
"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."
"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."
"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."
"There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow."
"The navigation can be better."
"Notebooks in PyCharm is not as intuitive as it could be."
"The user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively."
"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."
"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."
"They should improve the product's interactiveness."
"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."
"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."
"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."
PyCharm is ranked 7th in Static Code Analysis with 8 reviews while ReShaper is ranked 3rd in Static Code Analysis with 2 reviews. PyCharm is rated 8.6, while ReShaper is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of PyCharm writes "Convenient to use and surely increases the effectiveness of software development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReShaper writes "Detects, analyzes, and fixes any coding issues". PyCharm is most compared with Fortify Static Code Analyzer, whereas ReShaper is most compared with Whole Tomato Visual Assist and Fortify Static Code Analyzer.
See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.
We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
