Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Prisma Access Browser Logo

Top 10 Prisma Access Browser Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
3.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Prisma Access Browser Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Prisma Access Browser based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zscaler Internet Access, Cloudflare One, and Island. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Prisma Access Browser surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with cloud services, robust security measures, and an intuitive user interface that ensures efficient and secure remote access for businesses seeking streamlined and protected connectivity solutions.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Zscaler Internet Access
4.2 out of 5
Zscaler Internet Access appeals with its swift deployment and integration, enhancing network efficiency. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser impresses with its extensive security features and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing custom solutions. Pricing favors Zscaler's ROI, whereas Prisma offers long-term security benefits.
Zscaler Internet Access typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Prisma Access Browser offers a more budget-friendly installation, highlighting cost as a significant differentiator.
View comparison
Pricing
Zscaler Internet Access typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Prisma Access Browser offers a more budget-friendly installation, highlighting cost as a significant differentiator.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Cloudflare One offers cost-effective solutions with robust security and high-speed performance, ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser provides extensive features, including advanced threat prevention, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive security. Cloudflare One's pricing suits budget-conscious buyers, while Prisma Access Browser demands higher initial investment for long-term benefits.
Cloudflare One is praised for its minimal setup costs, while Prisma Access Browser involves relatively higher initial expenses, offering distinct price points for businesses evaluating secure access solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare One is praised for its minimal setup costs, while Prisma Access Browser involves relatively higher initial expenses, offering distinct price points for businesses evaluating secure access solutions.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Island
1 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Island
1 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser appeals with its seamless integration and competitive pricing, ideal for budget-conscious environments. In comparison, Island offers advanced security features and niche-focused capabilities, suitable for organizations needing specialized protection against sophisticated threats. Both solutions prioritize robust support and effective threat mitigation.
Prisma Access Browser offers a lower setup cost compared to Island, highlighting a budget-friendly option. Island, however, provides more advanced features that might justify its higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access Browser offers a lower setup cost compared to Island, highlighting a budget-friendly option. Island, however, provides more advanced features that might justify its higher initial expense.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Google Chrome Enterprise
4.2 out of 5
Google Chrome Enterprise excels in IT infrastructure integration and centralized policy management. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser offers advanced threat prevention and secure app access. Buyers might choose Google Chrome Enterprise for cost efficiency, while others prefer Prisma Access Browser for its comprehensive security features.
Google Chrome Enterprise requires a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access Browser, which involves higher initial expenses. Google Chrome Enterprise offers a more cost-effective solution upfront, whereas Prisma Access Browser may need a larger budget allocation for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Chrome Enterprise requires a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access Browser, which involves higher initial expenses. Google Chrome Enterprise offers a more cost-effective solution upfront, whereas Prisma Access Browser may need a larger budget allocation for setup.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway
4.4 out of 5
Netskope appeals to tech buyers prioritizing advanced threat protection due to its robust security features. In comparison, Prisma Access attracts those investing in scalable cloud-native solutions, emphasized through its cloud-based architecture designed for seamless network integration and comprehensive support.
Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is praised for its straightforward setup and lower initial cost, while Prisma Access Browser offers robust security features but incurs higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is praised for its straightforward setup and lower initial cost, while Prisma Access Browser offers robust security features but incurs higher setup expenses.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Menlo Secure
4.6 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Menlo Secure
4.6 out of 5
Menlo Secure appeals to buyers with its quick deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser, with its comprehensive feature set, attracts those seeking robust, future-proof solutions. Buyers who value rapid setup may prefer Menlo Secure, while feature-focused buyers might choose Prisma Access Browser.
Menlo Secure's setup cost is often higher, while Prisma Access Browser is noted for its more budget-friendly setup and deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
Menlo Secure's setup cost is often higher, while Prisma Access Browser is noted for its more budget-friendly setup and deployment options.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Symantec Secure Web Gateway
3.3 out of 5
Symantec Secure Web Gateway excels with lower setup costs and adaptable support. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser offers seamless cloud integration and advanced threat detection. Symantec attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Prisma Access appeals to those seeking enhanced performance and future-ready solutions.
Symantec Secure Web Gateway has a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access Browser, which features a higher initial investment for installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Secure Web Gateway has a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access Browser, which features a higher initial investment for installation.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Check Point Harmony Browse
4.4 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser offers competitive pricing and straightforward deployment for tech buyers seeking a cost-effective solution. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Browse provides robust features and sophisticated protection, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security and willing to invest in advanced capabilities.
Prisma Access Browser has a higher initial setup cost, offering robust security features, whereas Check Point Harmony Browse provides a cost-effective setup with essential protections.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access Browser has a higher initial setup cost, offering robust security features, whereas Check Point Harmony Browse provides a cost-effective setup with essential protections.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
LayerX
1 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser Logo
LayerX
1 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser is favored for comprehensive security features and infrastructure integration. In comparison, LayerX attracts attention with AI-driven analytics and adaptive security. Tech buyers may prefer Prisma for robust security or LayerX for innovative functionalities and cost-effective solutions.
Prisma Access Browser has higher setup costs compared to LayerX, which offers a more affordable initial investment, making LayerX a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users seeking lower setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access Browser has higher setup costs compared to LayerX, which offers a more affordable initial investment, making LayerX a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users seeking lower setup expenses.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
IBM Secure Gateway Service
1 out of 5
IBM Secure Gateway Service is preferred for cost-effective integration and customer support. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser excels in security protocols for complex networks. IBM appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Prisma Access Browser attracts those needing advanced security features.
IBM Secure Gateway Service has a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access Browser, which may have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Secure Gateway Service has a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access Browser, which may have higher initial expenses.
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Prisma Access Browser Logo
Citrix Enterprise Browser
1 out of 5
Prisma Access Browser attracts tech buyers with its affordable pricing and easy cloud deployment. In comparison, Citrix Enterprise Browser, despite its higher cost, appeals with comprehensive data protection and rich enterprise management features, offering significant ROI for those willing to invest.
Prisma Access Browser incurs higher setup costs compared to the Citrix Enterprise Browser, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access Browser incurs higher setup costs compared to the Citrix Enterprise Browser, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Enterprise Browsers
Internet Security