Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
  • Home
  • Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Klocwork vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo

Klocwork

Read 3 Klocwork reviews
5,028 views|3,464 comparisons
Parasoft Logo

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 1 Parasoft SOAtest review
4,163 views|2,704 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
September 2022
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Klocwork and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest report (Updated: September 2022).
Download the complete report
633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Mature, saves time in finding defects, and is simple to maintain
It saves a lot of time when it comes to finding defects, it's basically inputted in every access we do.
Use Parasoft SOAtest?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the Incremental analysis.""Technical support is quite good.""Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes a problem."

More Klocwork Pros →

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros →

Cons
"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript.""Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions.""Every update that we receive requires of us a lengthy and involved process."

More Klocwork Cons →

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."
  • "Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."
  • "There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

    • More Klocwork Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Klocwork?
    Top Answer:Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?
    Top Answer:There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Klocwork?
    Top Answer:Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free or low-cost solutions, like Visual Studio Code Analyzer.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    16th
    out of 37 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    5,028
    Comparisons
    3,464
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    7.5
    17th
    out of 37 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    4,163
    Comparisons
    2,704
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    458
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    Perforce
    Parasoft
    Overview

    Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

    Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
    Offer
    Learn more about Klocwork
    Learn More
    Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
    Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Engineering Company14%
    Non Tech Company14%
    Transportation Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Government15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    September 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, GitLab and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: September 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Klocwork is ranked 16th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 17th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Klocwork is rated 7.6, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Klocwork writes "Useful code analysis, straightforward implementation, but more features needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". Klocwork is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Veracode, Polyspace Code Prover and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, ReadyAPI Test, Coverity and Apache JMeter.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.