Parasoft SOAtest and Klocwork compete in the software testing and static analysis space. Parasoft SOAtest appears to have the upper hand due to its pricing and customer support, although Klocwork is favored for its code analysis abilities.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust API testing, integration with development environments, and comprehensive test automation features. Klocwork provides precise static code analysis, efficient vulnerability detection, and specialized features for large, complex codebases.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users suggest enhancing reporting functionalities, improving performance for large datasets, and expanding API test configurations. Klocwork users recommend improving error documentation, adding support for more programming languages, and optimizing user interface flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is noted for its straightforward deployment and supportive customer service. Klocwork's deployment is more complex but well-documented, though its customer service is perceived as needing improvement compared to Parasoft.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest offers competitive pricing options, which is attractive for smaller teams. Klocwork, although more expensive, provides higher ROI for larger organizations dealing with complex coding environments due to its extensive analysis capabilities.
The main ROI factors include efficiency and how we meet compliance standards for various automotive requirements.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
The issue is not about the knowledge of the support but about the prioritization of the tickets they handle.
The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met.
During the initial phase when I did interact with the vendor, the support was satisfactory.
Klocwork supports our scalability needs without issues, even as project volumes increase.
The program-to-program enablement is scalable.
Installation is easy, and the solution is stable.
Klocwork should be able to analyze large codebases efficiently, supporting a desktop version for periodic small delta changes before pushing to the server.
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits.
Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
It is less expensive than Coverity.
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
The solution is not very cheap, however, it is less expensive than Coverity.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is the static analysis tools, which help identify potential security threats and errors.
Its integration with the CI/CD pipeline has helped streamline the software development process.
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is its reduced setup time.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.