Parasoft SOAtest and SonarQube Server are competitive software testing and code quality tools. Parasoft SOAtest provides strong end-to-end testing features, while SonarQube Server excels in code scanning and integration across multiple languages.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest facilitates rapid setup of functional test scenarios with multiple data sources and custom validations. It offers broad protocol support and seamless integration with scripting languages, enhancing end-to-end testing capabilities. SonarQube Server provides extensive static code analysis across various programming languages, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, making it strong in continuous code quality management.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its user interface, resource efficiency, and reporting formats. Enhanced tool integration would also be beneficial. For SonarQube Server, areas for development include dynamic testing capabilities, enhanced security issue detection, and expanded support for newer technologies and languages. User interface improvements and better third-party integration are also suggested by its users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest primarily supports on-premises deployment and is praised for its responsive and knowledgeable customer support. SonarQube Server offers flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premises setups, along with robust community support. However, its user interface and deployment process can be improved further.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is a premium product with higher costs, justified by its comprehensive support and advanced functionalities, resulting in substantial ROI through automation efficiency. SonarQube Server, accessible through its open-source model, provides a competitive solution with significant free features, appealing to cost-sensitive organizations without additional licensing expenses.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
I have seen a return on the investment from SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) because the value it adds relates to static code analysis and vulnerability assessments needed for our FDA approval process.
We see productivity increasing based on the fact that the code review is mostly automated, allowing the developer to fix the code themselves before assigning it to someone else to review, thus receiving that ROI.
They showed us where we can actually get those granular level reporting extracted for Excel, which was a quick guide.
I would rate the technical support for SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 10 because we have not faced any specific issues that required us to contact tech support, which is a very rare case.
The community support is quite effective.
I find SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) very scalable because we're able to create a new repository and integrate all the tools on that project and it just works.
I would rate the scalability of SonarQube Server as a 10 because we can configure the server to scan multiple projects based on the number of lines.
I think SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is stable, and we did not face any problems unless there was a power outage or if the LAN cable was plugged out.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
Currently, it should also be able to analyze the code and generate and fix the code for specific developers or features that the developers are tracking.
If I fix some vulnerabilities today, they reappear in the next scan, and there will be completely different issues that need to be fixed.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
I would rate the pricing for SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as an 8, where 1 is very cheap and 10 is very expensive, because Coverity is very expensive, and while SonarQube is not cheap, it is still less expensive than Coverity.
They always offer around a two-year contract, but we always take a one-year contract because it's expensive.
The freemium version of SonarQube Server offers excellent value, especially compared to the high costs of Snyk.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
We use SonarQube Server's centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve.
Some of the static code analysis capabilities are the most beneficial.
The most valuable features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) for us include having control of the rules, enabling and disabling them.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.
SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.
What are the key features of SonarQube Server?Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
