Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo

Top 10 Oracle Database Backup Service Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Database Backup Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, and Amazon S3. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Database Backup Service surpasses its competitors by offering robust data protection, scalable cloud storage, and seamless integration with existing Oracle environments, ensuring high reliability and efficiency for businesses reliant on Oracle's comprehensive data management solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Microsoft Azure File Storage
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Azure File Storage integrates seamlessly with Azure services and offers efficient file sharing capabilities, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Oracle Database Backup Service provides reliable, secure backup and recovery tailored for Oracle databases, justifying its investment with advanced, specialized features.
Download Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers a lower setup cost, while Oracle Database Backup Service requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers a lower setup cost, while Oracle Database Backup Service requires a higher initial investment.
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier
4.3 out of 5
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier
4.3 out of 5
Amazon S3 Glacier offers cost-effective storage and retrieval for large-scale archiving. In comparison, Oracle Database Backup Service excels with seamless Oracle database integration and comprehensive backup functionalities. Amazon’s economical pricing contrasts Oracle's higher ROI due to reliability and feature-rich performance.
Download Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report
Amazon S3 Glacier has a lower setup cost, while Oracle Database Backup Service has higher initial expenses. These differences make Amazon S3 Glacier more affordable upfront compared to Oracle Database Backup Service.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon S3 Glacier has a lower setup cost, while Oracle Database Backup Service has higher initial expenses. These differences make Amazon S3 Glacier more affordable upfront compared to Oracle Database Backup Service.
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Amazon S3
4.4 out of 5
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Amazon S3
4.4 out of 5
Amazon S3 appeals to users for its competitive pricing and smooth integration. In comparison, Oracle Database Backup Service attracts customers due to its advanced security measures and seamless compatibility within the Oracle ecosystem. Amazon S3's straightforward deployment contrasts with Oracle's detailed but complex configurations.
Download Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report
The setup cost for Amazon S3 is typically lower than the Oracle Database Backup Service. Oracle Database Backup Service tends to have higher initial expenses, reflecting its robust enterprise-level features compared to Amazon S3.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Amazon S3 is typically lower than the Oracle Database Backup Service. Oracle Database Backup Service tends to have higher initial expenses, reflecting its robust enterprise-level features compared to Amazon S3.
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Wasabi
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Wasabi
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Database Backup Service offers robust integration and scalability, suitable for enterprise needs. In comparison, Wasabi provides simplicity and rapid deployment. Oracle's customer support ensures thorough assistance, whereas Wasabi's cost-effectiveness and quick ROI make it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
Download Oracle Database Backup Service vs. Wasabi Report
Oracle Database Backup Service has a higher setup cost compared to Wasabi, making Wasabi a more budget-friendly option for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database Backup Service has a higher setup cost compared to Wasabi, making Wasabi a more budget-friendly option for initial setup.
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000
4.6 out of 5
Oracle Database Backup Service offers cost-effective cloud-based solutions with robust encryption. In comparison, HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 focuses on high-performance storage and AI-driven analytics. Tech buyers may choose Oracle for budget-friendly integration or HPE for scalability and advanced features.
Download HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report
Oracle Database Backup Service offers straightforward setup with potentially lower initial costs, while HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 provides advanced features and scalability that might require higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database Backup Service offers straightforward setup with potentially lower initial costs, while HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 provides advanced features and scalability that might require higher upfront investment.

Related categories

Public Cloud Storage Services
Enterprise SAN