Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 10.0% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 48 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

2,796 Views
1,579 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 10 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

323 Views
194 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service compete in data storage and backup solutions. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its feature richness.

Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight easy integration, scalability, and robust security features as valuable. Oracle Database Backup Service users appreciate its advanced backup options, high data integrity, and comprehensive data management tools.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers of Microsoft Azure File Storage suggest improvements in performance speed and more granular backup options. Oracle Database Backup Service users point out the complexity of the setup process and desire better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Database Backup Service users mention a steeper learning curve and slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering a strong return on investment due to lower setup costs. Oracle Database Backup Service, although pricier, provides substantial ROI if advanced feature sets are fully leveraged.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Backup Service

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 10.0%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration

We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…

Read full review

Hossein Nezamabadi

Oracle Database Administrator | Linux system Administrator at Pooya Co. Inc.

Has an easy setup process and good technical support services

We use Oracle Database Backup Service to manage incremental, differential, and cumulative backups The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality. We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups. We have been using Oracle…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that we can copy and download data using Azure. It's not just for file storage; we can also use it for large data sets or to host static web applications."

"The security features and the ease of integration are good."

"The initial setup is very seamless."

"The storage in this solution is excellent."

"The solution is easy to use."

"My client had zero data loss while using the solution for backups and file security."

"The profile management option is another valuable feature that allows us to manage the profiles and secure them."

"It's a scalable solution."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros

"The interface is good."

"The backup is reliable and intuitive."

"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."

"It's a scalable product."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if we could remove data that we don't frequently access to reduce the cost of the storage."

"I have used the file storage explorer in multiple systems, and it seems a bit cumbersome and not very efficient, particularly with authentication. It can be tricky to set it up."

"The initial setup is complex. Unless you have done it a few times it, it is going to be hard."

"Importing and exporting data needs to have a bit more documentation."

"The product must provide better security functions."

"The provider needs to collect more information about the products."

"Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering."

"The transparency of cost should be improved."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."

"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."

"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

"The solution needs to add an archive function."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."

"We cannot use the product with other brands."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."

"I think the pricing of the product can be reduced."

"The product's pricing need improvement."

"The pricing could be more flexible."

"The pricing is usually dependent on your storage requirements. Overall, I believe Microsoft Azure File Storage's price is reasonable."

"One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."

"The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google."

"There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

"The platform is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

"The platform is expensive."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?

From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 46% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 21% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 61% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 39% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

May 2025

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

June 2025

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage

No data available

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Microsoft

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.