Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 9.9% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 50 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

4,985 Views
2,243 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 11 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

381 Views
351 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service compete in data storage and backup solutions. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its feature richness.

Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight easy integration, scalability, and robust security features as valuable. Oracle Database Backup Service users appreciate its advanced backup options, high data integrity, and comprehensive data management tools.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers of Microsoft Azure File Storage suggest improvements in performance speed and more granular backup options. Oracle Database Backup Service users point out the complexity of the setup process and desire better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Database Backup Service users mention a steeper learning curve and slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering a strong return on investment due to lower setup costs. Oracle Database Backup Service, although pricier, provides substantial ROI if advanced feature sets are fully leveraged.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Backup Service

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 9.9%, down from 13.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure File Storage	9.9%
Oracle Database Backup Service	1.3%
Other	88.8%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration

We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Senior Operation Engineer at Vodafone

Achieve high availability and security with automated tasks over a decade

While there are some disadvantages in this product, from my experience with basic use cases, daily tasks, integration, scheduling, saving, and encryption, I have not encountered significant areas for improvement. However, the addition of a GUI configuration management and administration console for all administrative tasks would be highly beneficial. It would be preferable to have the ability to perform all console, terminal, and command line operations through a GUI interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good service for file storage."

"It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."

"Its most valuable features are speed and security."

"The solution can scale to fit any requirement."

"The product is a reliable cloud solution."

"Very user-friendly and intuitive."

"Azure File Storage gives good value for money, so I don't find it expensive."

"File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros

"The interface is good."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is stable and offers high availability and the commands for restoration and backup processes are not complicated."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"It's a scalable product."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is stable and offers high availability, and the commands for restoration and backup processes are not complicated."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."

"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing."

"The product’s pricing could be better."

"It would be good if they added some features that make the solution easier to access for everyone."

"If the file is large, there may be a delay in download time."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"The product must provide better security functions."

"Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information."

"The support could improve."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons

"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."

"The installation process is easy for me because I have performed this action hundreds of times. However, it is important to note that beginners and even some senior professionals may encounter significant difficulties during installation."

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."

"We cannot use the product with other brands."

"The solution needs to add an archive function."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."

"We have Microsoft Azure File Storage's enterprise license."

"The product's pricing need improvement."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. The pricing model is based on usage."

"The pricing could be more flexible."

"The product must improve its price."

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure File Storage comes with an agreement from Microsoft."

"The price of Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive, we do not know exactly how the price is calculated."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"The platform is expensive."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"The platform is expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?

From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 61% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 13% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 42% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 42% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 16% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

August 2025

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

August 2025

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage

No data available

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Microsoft

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.