Amazon S3 Glacier vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,661 views|5,683 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
916 views|775 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier.""The solution’s storage management is good and dynamic. The product is highly stable. The solution is highly scalable. The customer service and support is good. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend the solution.""It is the most feature-rich platform.""The data archive feature is valuable.""AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).""The solution is stable.""The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally.""I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features.""The backup is reliable and intuitive.""It's a scalable product.""The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality.""Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven.""The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning.""From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.""The interface is good."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Pros →

Cons
"The product needs to improve cloud security.""The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage.""The user experience must be improved.""The technical support has room for improvement.""They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price.""There is room for improvement in handling GDPR compliance better. GDPR is about personal data protection and retention. It would be great if S3 Glacier could handle compliance items related to this, especially with upcoming legislation like the California law, which restricts data storage time and allows users to request data deletion.""I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the market.""I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment.""We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups.""Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined.""The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it.""The solution needs to add an archive function.""Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution.""We cannot use the product with other brands.""The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
  • "Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."
  • "The platform is expensive."
  • "The platform is expensive."
  • "The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."
  • More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the… more »
    Top Answer:From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.
    Top Answer:The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.
    Top Answer:The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,661
    Comparisons
    5,683
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    916
    Comparisons
    775
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    283
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

    Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

    Sample Customers
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business78%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 5th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.