We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."
"It's very practical and reliable."
"I could store any type of file using the solution."
"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."
"It is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that it frees up space in your device by allowing you to store your files on the cloud and provides 15GB storage for free."
"The solution is very flexible."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are flexibility and sustainability."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"It's a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"In the next release, if improvements are made to the GPU instances for machine learning, for example, it would be helpful."
"I'm not really comfortable with the user interface because I don't use it very often."
"The cost of additional storage could be cheaper."
"The tool should be cheaper."
"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."
"Google Cloud Storage can improve by having better integration and migration tools."
"The solution could always be more user-friendly."
"Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but you have to pay extra."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Microsoft Azure File Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.