We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the product is storage classes."
"Uploads are secure and occur instantly."
"I've also used Azure's tool, and S3 is far more stable I haven't seen the same issues on AWS that I'm having on Azure. Amazon CloudFront is way faster. The websites are loading way faster than when you do it on Azure CDN."
"I used Amazon AWS/S3 solution to prove my concept before deploying it on real hardware. It was a great experience and was really scalable."
"The solution is good and includes all the features we expect."
"The solution is easy to use for anyone with minimal technical knowledge."
"We have cold storage here, and I think that's useful. When it comes to commercialization, it's cheaper to put data that you won't be using into the data storage. You only use a little bit of the data needed each day for your transition, so you pay less."
"The versioning of this solution for accidental deletion has been most valuable."
"It's a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The interface is good."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Amazon S3's unit of measure for expansion should be smaller."
"The solution's data transfer speed could be improved."
"They could always increase object storage ability."
"It is expensive for storing."
"Could include some additional security features."
"If a certain resource is left unchecked, you can easily use a lot of it and drive up costs."
"Amazon S3 could improve the performance reports. It would be a benefit if they were more comprehensive."
"We have used the support from Amazon S3. The support is expensive and could be reduced."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon S3 is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 65 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
