Amazon S3 Glacier Reviews

We were using Amazon S3 Glacier, and I have experience with this solution. We had an S3 bucket that we were using about a year ago. We just started using Amazon S3 Glacier, and overall, I have been using it for less than 12 months, not quite a year. I have approximately 20 years of experience working in storage.

Amazon S3 Glacier is very simple and very easy to implement. It is straightforward to use. Amazon provides a lot of support with extensive documentation available through Amazon Web Services. The solution offers a free tier, which allows you to pick up their tools and get a minimum solution that you can test in their environment. This is really nice because before you put something into production or make a big purchase, you can test and use the environment to know exactly what you are getting into.

What we use Amazon S3 Glacier for is archiving. We are able to keep data archived in Glacier, which means it is cheaper than keeping it online or keeping it available on-site. Pricing is one of the main aspects that makes this product appealing. The advantage is that it provides an affordable archival solution.

We have not really come across any downsides for us. It is possible that the retrieval of data may be expensive, which could be an issue, but we have not experienced that in fairness. Integration with our policies would be beneficial. We have policies for our systems where we delete data after a certain number of years, and having integration with Amazon S3 Glacier would be good. Having a guarantee that Amazon S3 Glacier would persist for the amount of time that we require in our archives would be valuable. In other words, Amazon would need to commit to support for the period we need. We could be talking about 20 years or longer. We cannot always move to the next version because we need to maintain old systems and legacy systems in order to maintain archives. A guarantee around support would be a good thing to have.

We have not retrieved anything yet from Amazon S3 Glacier, so we are okay, but we have not utilized the various retrieval options available.

Amazon S3 Glacier has very good support and technical support. There is a lot of documentation and a lot of help that you can get. I would rate support at 10 out of 10. Amazon S3 Glacier is a good solution for us, and I am very happy with it. I would rate it another 10 out of 10.

Positive

Amazon S3 Glacier offers an easy way to access a free solution. You can pick up their tools and get a minimum solution that you can play with in their environment, which is really nice because it means that before you would put something into production or before you would make a big purchase, you can actually test and use the environment and know exactly what you are getting into. We are an end user of the product. My overall rating for Amazon S3 Glacier is 10 out of 10.

We just use it for file storage, so it is good enough for us. From a strategy perspective, we use the Intelligent-Tiering, so some files might be stored in Amazon S3 Glacier.

It serves as raw file storage which we rarely access.

The value of Amazon S3 Glacier for us is the lower cost.

We put files there and tend not to touch them afterward. We use KMS keys to encrypt data, which is our fundamental and only encryption method for files with Amazon S3 Glacier.

KMS helps secure our data effectively. I cannot speak to how the integration of Amazon S3 Glacier with AWS Lambda or Amazon EventBridge impacts our workflows as I am not aware of these integrations.

The support could be improved by having specialized support staff. When we submit a question, it gets passed between multiple people before finding the right expert. We typically see the case being handed over three to four times before reaching someone who can properly address our inquiry.

I have limited knowledge about it and it is somewhat complicated because we need a separate team to manage it.

It saves on cost because we do not have to maintain it.

Neutral

I am not quite sure about the setup cost or process of Amazon S3 Glacier because another team manages these aspects. We are simply using the service.

Though I am not the decision maker, Amazon S3 Glacier is beneficial due to its lower cost. Once we put files there, we do not have to manage them, which provides convenience and saves operational costs.

I am not familiar with how Amazon S3 Glacier is deployed or which deployment model is used, such as hybrid cloud or others. Based on my experience with the product, I would rate it 5 out of 10.

We use Amazon S3 Glacier primarily for archiving data that we need less frequently. The data is stored in a cold format, meaning we can wait even up to a day for retrieval without impacting our operations. We also use other AWS solutions like EC2 and S3.

Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust security features and practically infinite storage, where we can store all kinds of media swiftly. It supports various data types, including semi-structured and raw formats. These features facilitate log management and data dumping since the service is versatile enough to handle large volumes of data and provide necessary security.

We haven't observed any significant issues needing improvement. However, there is room for improvement in terms of support. It could be more robust, with a focus on providing comprehensive solutions even for novel issues.

We have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for over five years.

Amazon S3 Glacier is very stable. It is specifically designed for cold storage, and we are aware of the Service Level Agreement (SLA) associated with it. We have not experienced any glitches or bugs, as the latency is expected and acceptable given our use case.

Amazon S3 Glacier is infinitely scalable, with no issues on our end. Depending on the parameters configured, the solution scales effectively. We ensure adequate calibration to accommodate spikes in our usage, which allows for seamless scaling.

Customer support is satisfactory, with a response time that aligns with the plan we purchased. However, there is room for improvement in providing more skilled and comprehensive solutions.

Neutral

We previously used Fortify Static Code Analyzer, however, it became obsolete for us as its features are now integrated into our ECS setup.

Since it's a cloud service, deployment and installation are not applicable in the traditional sense. We primarily use the AWS SDK for initial setup, which is straightforward.

Amazon S3 Glacier offers numerous features quickly. However, if AWS improves support and cost management, there would be fewer reasons for users to consider other cloud platforms.

The pricing of AWS solutions could be simplified and made more cost-effective. Compared to competitors like GCP, AWS can work on reducing hidden costs and overall pricing to retain startups and medium-sized businesses.

We evaluated Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Microsoft Azure for potential migrations, mainly due to pricing considerations.

I would give Amazon S3 Glacier a rating of ten points. In terms of features, no other cloud solutions or private installations come close to its capabilities. However, improvement is needed in pricing and support systems. The overall solution on a scale of one to ten is rated at a ten.

I am using AWS products such as EC2, Lambda, and Load Balancers.

We are taking backups for the database and other things, and we are using it as a backup repository.

The cost is high, which I think is one of the best features of the product.

Scalability is one of the advantages, and it is very highly available.

The security features include object lock encryption and immutability options, so we can use this for backups.

The initial setup of the product is straightforward and easy.

I am not sure about improvements; so far it has been good for me.

The pricing is on the higher side. I have not mentioned any features as the product is good.

Pricing is my concern; this is the only concern so far.

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for about two years.

I think it is effective for data protection with no challenges here.

I do not experience any stability issues. It depends upon the network connectivity, and having AWS Direct Connect makes things easy.

The support is good. If it is a business plan, then the support we have is really good.

Positive

I have never used something similar to Amazon S3 Glacier from different vendors for the same use case.

I purchased this product directly from AWS as a service.

Savings are there. As it is Amazon S3 Glacier, it is used only for archival purposes, so it is comparatively okay to use it, and we can save money compared to the standard which is high.

I do not work on any projects currently, but I studied about the integration capability with AWS Lambda and EventBridge.

It depends on the requirements. Sometimes we cannot keep the data at other solutions or regions, but it is available in my region on AWS, which is good for me.

We can convert it to anything as there are options for public, private, and hybrid cloud.

It can enable the immutable features and encryption. Amazon S3 Glacier bucket can cover PCI compliance.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine.

Amazon S3 Glacier is primarily used for archiving data. We use it for long-term data storage, especially in industries that require data to be kept for extensive periods, like financial sectors and banks. Amazon S3 Glacier gives control over the duration of data storage and its removal.

Moving our archival data to Glacier has saved our operational costs. This cost-effectiveness allows us to allocate resources to other operations.

The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability. Its auto-scaling capabilities allow us to add data continuously without needing to pre-provision storage.

I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage. Additionally, improvements in configuration management and tab management, such as providing pre-set templates for setting policies, would enhance user experience.

I have been working with Amazon S3 Glacier for two to three years. Each project has its own needs, and not all require data archival.

Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten. There are rare instances where regional issues could cause some outages, but overall it's reliable.

Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data. It continues to scale as more data is added, without the need for initial provisioning. I would rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

I have not interacted with technical support for Amazon S3 Glacier since I have not encountered issues that required it.

Positive

Before Amazon S3 Glacier, we used general S3 storage for our archives, which was quite expensive. Organizations also stored data on hard drives or on-prem setups.

The initial setup of Amazon S3 Glacier is quite easy. For someone familiar with the service, it hardly takes any time. It could be a challenge for those new to it, who might need some preparation.

The deployment can be managed by one knowledgeable person, and ongoing management requires minimal involvement since it's a self-maintained service.

The transition to Amazon S3 Glacier has saved us on operational costs, allowing us to invest in other parts of the organization.

I would rate the pricing a seven. While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer. It's challenging to understand, as it varies based on time and usage.

For block storage, S3 is the main option. Other options like EBS or EFS are available but are more expensive and less scalable.

It's important to understand the purpose of Amazon S3 Glacier. Ensure calculations regarding data needs and archiving strategies are in place before using it. Have a plan ready for data retrieval that accounts for the time required.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I primarily work in the solutioning part of Enterprise Data Warehouse building. We use AWS services like Redshift, Glue, S3 data lake house building, and Iceberg for ACID confirmation. We also incorporate Glacier for data archival, especially for regulatory compliance and data retention.

The most valuable feature of Glacier is its storage capability and cost benefit. The storage cost is minimal compared to S3 hot storage, making it ideal for historical data. Although retrieval costs are high, Glacier greatly helps in managing storage costs by moving historical data to a lower-cost storage option.

The cost of retrieval in Glacier is quite high. It would be excellent if Amazon could work on reducing retrieval costs. Another improvement is making Glacier available in all regions.

My involvement with Glacier has been in the solutioning part, which means I engage with it for a limited period, usually for a few months, as part of designing and recommending services for data lifecycle management.

I would rate the stability of Glacier for archival purposes at around eight out of ten. It is considered a good product for what it is designed to do.

Glacier has excellent scalability, with elasticity and security that meet industry standards. I would rate it nine to ten out of ten for scalability.

I would rate Amazon Technical Support a seven. While they provide documentation and resolve issues, they often do not provide immediate solutions.

Neutral

We previously used AWS products such as Athena, Glue, and Redshift. Presently, I am working within Azure and Snowflake due to changing project requirements and client needs.

The setup for Glacier is simple. It is completely cloud-based, and you can define and enforce data lifecycle policies to automate data transitions.

I am involved in the solutioning part where we design the architecture. The actual implementation and operations are managed by developers, Data Engineers, and DevOps Engineers.

The cost benefit is one of the significant advantages of Glacier. The storage cost is minimal, which is beneficial for archival purposes.

Competitor solutions include Google Cloud Storage and Azure's ADLS Gen2 or Azure Blob storage. Cost is often a deciding factor between these products.

Glacier is a good product, and I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

It is particularly useful for regulatory and compliance tasks that require cold storage.

We used to have our own storage, hardware, and software in a legacy environment. Our data was completely stored on-premises. Nowadays, AWS is offering a cheap way of storing data. We use Amazon S3 Glacier for the project's storage purposes.

Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle. The solution is easy to handle, where you have to log in, upload, and check your details. Amazon S3 Glacier is a simple, user-friendly, scalable, flexible, and easy-to-use solution.

Amazon S3 Glacier could be more flexible, user-friendly, and secure.

Amazon S3 Glacier has good stability.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Users have to pay for what they use. You can easily scale the solution from 15 to 20 terabytes, but you have to pay for that in the next bill cycle. Amazon S3 Glacier is used by around 100 users from the development team in our organization.

The solution's initial setup is straightforward and not complex. In the initial legacy, we used to put our servers in our data centers, look for storage, and give a path to that storage. In Amazon S3 Glacier, you can directly put your credentials for the portal login and upload your data.

Amazon S3 Glacier doesn't take much time to deploy. You have to log in to a simple user portal for AWS; do two or three clicks, and you are good to go. Individuals without much technical expertise can install the solution. However, you need a technical person to manage all the accounts.

Our organization doesn't need to spend money creating infrastructure on their premises. Since Amazon S3 Glacier is a cloud-based solution, we don't have to put machines in data centers or use hardware storage in the data center.

Other on-premises storage solutions are much more expensive than Amazon S3 Glacier. Customers prefer Amazon S3 Glacier because it is a cheap and pay-as-you-go solution.

There is no licensing for Amazon S3 Glacier. It has a billing cycle, where you have to pay for what you use at the end of the month. If you use more, you have to pay more. If you use less, then you have to pay less.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a completely cloud-based solution.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.

My company leverages the tool's functionalities for document and file storage. The tool also provides leverage to our company to push documents from outside into our networks or into video applications that can easily consume them, which helps our organization create a good interface for our customers. In general, the tool is useful to push data and information across the organization.

If there is a bulk move from the existing archival solutions like OpenText, integration capabilities in Amazon S3 Glacier would be useful. Seamless integration capabilities can help users easily switch from one tool to another. I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features.

I have experience with Amazon S3 Glacier.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

Amazon S3 Glacier is used by my company's 2,500 applications, which have around a million users. Cargill itself is a company worth 1,500,000 USD. My company also has many internal employees who use the product.

There are around 2,500 applications for the product. As time passes by and the business grows, our company will have to have more solutions in place. There will be more users when our company decides to build more applications using Amazon S3 Glacier. In general, the use of the product will increase.

I contacted the technical support team to help me with Amazon S3's database area. Amazon's technical support team is very good because they could help our company deal with the issue in the product, and we are also able to figure out why and what had happened in the tool.

The support was fast, knowledgeable, and customer-friendly.

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

The product's deployment phase is taken care of on another platform by another team, who does it for us.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The number of staff members required for the deployment and maintenance of the application varies from application to application since some of them are small while others are big. On the use cases and size of applications, different engineers are deployed to help leverage the services of the product.

The price point at which the product is available is pretty good.

My company does not use the product for data archiving since we have other solutions for it.

The low-cost storage solution impacted our budget for data backup, but I can't comment much since our organization is not yet leveraging functionalities. I know that there will be a huge impact on our budget for the solution if we start leveraging the tool for archival and backup.

The features I found most beneficial for secure data stored in the tool range from security availability to the ease of use it provides. I think pretty much everything has been valuable when it comes to the tool, especially if you are able to leverage its features.

The recovery options provided by the product are not used since my company does not use the tool for backup.

The product's scalability has impacted our company's ability to manage large datasets since I see that we are able to scale up, considering the data that increases every single day in our organization. In terms of performance, my company was able to scale up Amazon S3 Glacier's use. I don't think my company is looking out for more scalability features than what is offered by Amazon S3 Glacier.

I recommend the product to others who plan to use it, considering that it is easy to use. The positive factors of the product will fall into place once you start using it. Users can also figure out how the product stands out compared to the other services in the market.

The integration of Amazon S3 Glacier into our company's existing workflows improved data management processes in a pretty seamless manner. If you look at some other third-party tools, you know that no product is purely a cloud solution, and there are a lot of hybrid solutions. Many businesses use third-party middleware or software, like Boomi platform, which has come into play by providing integration between cloud and on-premises solutions.

The value derived by my company from the use of Amazon S3 Glacier is related to how we are able to seamlessly provide an interface for our company's customers to push data, documents, and other stuff, and it helps my company gather information that is required in a very easy manner. There are very few solutions that help our company deal with the aforementioned procedure. The time to market is also pretty small, but the tool has been really helpful in such areas.

I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

We use the solution for file storage. We store customer data in CSV and Excel files. We also use AWS for deployment purposes.

We don't have to manage anything. AWS manages everything. The solution is secure. We use the solution because the banking system needs to be secure.

The learning curve is very high.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The tool’s stability is good. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

The tool’s scalability is very good. We have around 200 users. We have 23 people on our technical team. We are planning to decrease the usage.

The technical support is good. We had some issues, and we raised the ticket. The support team provided a solution within 24 hours.

The initial setup is not complex, but it is not easy. The product is cloud-based.

Third-party consultants deployed the solution for us. We used Terraform to deploy the tool.

I work for a bank. They are not into technology. We use a third-party tool so that our job becomes easy. We do not want to manage everything technically.

The vendor must provide a cheaper solution. The tool is too expensive. It must be made more cost-effective.

We are also using API Gateway and NAT Gateway. We are using the infrastructure and security features of AWS. If an organization has the budget, they can use the product. If they have a big requirement, huge loads, and a need for high availability, they must choose cheaper products. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We use Amazon S3 Glacier for our storage purposes.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable and easy-to-manage solution with good read-write capability.

The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved.

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for six months.

Around 20 to 25 users are using the solution in our organization.

The solution’s technical support is very good.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a little expensive solution.

I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier to other users.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.