Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText eDOCS Content Management Logo

OpenText eDOCS Content Management Reviews

Vendor: OpenText

    What is OpenText eDOCS Content Management?

    OpenText eDOCS Content Management mindshare

    As of September 2025, the mindshare of OpenText eDOCS Content Management in the Enterprise Content Management category stands at 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
    Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
    ProductMarket Share (%)
    OpenText eDOCS Content Management1.3%
    SharePoint15.1%
    OpenText Documentum Content Management10.6%
    Other73.0%
    Enterprise Content Management

    Top industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Government
    18%
    Manufacturing Company
    17%
    Computer Software Company
    9%
    Legal Firm
    7%
    Financial Services Firm
    6%
    Energy/Utilities Company
    5%
    Retailer
    5%
    Educational Organization
    5%
    Comms Service Provider
    5%
    Healthcare Company
    4%
    Insurance Company
    3%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company
    3%
    Outsourcing Company
    2%
    University
    2%
    Non Profit
    2%
    Wholesaler/Distributor
    1%
    Construction Company
    1%
    Media Company
    1%
    Mining And Metals Company
    1%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    1%
    Renewables & Environment Company
    1%
    Sports Company
    1%
    Leisure / Travel Company
    1%
    Agriculture
    1%

    Compare OpenText eDOCS Content Management with alternative products

    Learn more about OpenText eDOCS Content Management

    OpenText eDOCS Content Management customers

    Related questions

     

    OpenText eDOCS Content Management reviews

    We have not yet collected reviews for OpenText eDOCS Content Management. Share your experience with PeerSpot's community.

    Share a review
    Below are alternatives Enterprise Content Management solutions to explore: