No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText eDOCS Content Management vs Tietoevry Public 360 comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText eDOCS Content Mana...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
20th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tietoevry Public 360
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of OpenText eDOCS Content Management is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tietoevry Public 360 is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText eDOCS Content Management1.2%
Tietoevry Public 3600.9%
Other97.9%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

BM
Information Technology Project Manager at PRASA
Compliance reporting has improved and document control is strong but workflows and access need work
We do not yet have workflow in OpenText eDOCS Content Management; it was my wish to implement workflows and all that, but we have not yet done so, as we are just using it as a document management system. We do have the metadata management feature in OpenText eDOCS Content Management, but not as well as I would have preferred it to be. Because of some organizational weaknesses, we know the mobile access capability in OpenText eDOCS Content Management is there, but it is not being used, and I think our biggest challenge is that we do not have someone solely responsible for enterprise content management. The challenge of it being managed or implemented on an ad hoc basis puts us at a disadvantage. I think OpenText eDOCS Content Management could be improved or enhanced by simplifying the implementation in the sense of modification or enhancements, and I do not know whether it is the issue of our service providers or all that; I think the pricing for modifications from our service providers makes it unpalatable, and because there are few of them, there is also the risk that it might be displaced by Microsoft SharePoint since the skill base for Microsoft SharePoint is wider and also more affordable.
Use Tietoevry Public 360?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Government
11%
Legal Firm
8%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OpenText eDOCS Content Management?
We do not yet have workflow in OpenText eDOCS Content Management; it was my wish to implement workflows and all that, but we have not yet done so, as we are just using it as a document management s...
What is your primary use case for OpenText eDOCS Content Management?
Our usual use case for OpenText eDOCS Content Management is for compliance, as we are a rail company that has to report to the rail regulator, and there are standard formats in which we have to rep...
What advice do you have for others considering OpenText eDOCS Content Management?
Overall, I would rate OpenText eDOCS Content Management at six based on my experience with the entirety of it; the reason for not giving it a ten is the human factor, both from the service provider...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Software Innovation Public 360
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Office of General Counsel (OGC) for the City of Jacksonville, MMG, Fox Entertainment Group, Evans & Dixon, TerraLink
Avinor, City of Bergen, Cross-County Cooperation, Kung_lv Local Administration, Municipality of Bergen, Omsorgsbygg, Oppland County, Sarpsborg Local Administration,Sarpsborg Municipality, Skien Municipality, Srum Municipality, Statnett, Stockholm City Planning Administration, The Danish Coastal Authority, The Danish Immigration Service, The Danish Parlament, The Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.