Microsoft Virtual Server offers virtual environment solutions that enhance connectivity, management, and resource efficiency across cloud and on-premises setups.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Virtual Server | 6.7% |
| Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) | 22.7% |
| Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) | 15.1% |
| Other | 55.5% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Virtualization | May 1, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 1, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Microsoft Virtual Server vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) | May 1, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Microsoft Virtual Server vs Microsoft App-V | May 1, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Microsoft Virtual Server vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) | May 1, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) | 4.2 | 22.7% | 93% | 128 interviewsAdd to research |
| Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) | 4.4 | 15.1% | 96% | 25 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Ideal for virtualizing environments, Microsoft Virtual Server enhances operational efficiency by integrating with existing tools while offering robust security and network integration. Its scalability and high availability support hybrid deployments, benefiting engineering, administration, and business functions.
What features does Microsoft Virtual Server offer?Microsoft Virtual Server finds use in engineering, administration, and testing applications across industries, leveraging cloud databases for better connectivity and enabling efficient operation in complex environments. It's particularly attractive for businesses needing centralized Active Directory management and file server access.
Microsoft Virtual Server was previously known as Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Software Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use Microsoft Virtual Server on Azure as an end-user for basic server tasks. It's stable, scalable, and cost-effective, though identifying VM owners is tough. Snapshots are helpful, and overall, the service has been satisfactory. |
| Senior Engineer Identity and Access at a government with 201-500 employees | 4.0 | I use Microsoft Virtual Server primarily for authentication and user management. Its performance, pricing, and PowerShell commands are valuable. However, the user interface needs improvement, and better integration and drag-and-drop features would enhance report formation and monitoring. |
| Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Virtual Server for around ten years and find it stable, cost-effective, and easy to manage, though some technical support can be costly. Overall, it's served our on-premises needs well alongside Microsoft Azure and Outlook. |
| Azure cloud support engineer at Tek Experts | 4.5 | I find Microsoft Virtual Server convenient for deploying various Windows versions quickly without needing physical hardware. It offers useful features like detachable storage and network security, but I wish it had better compatibility with macOS in the Azure Marketplace. |
| Student at Queens University Belfast | 3.5 | I found Microsoft Virtual Server convenient and compatible with Mac for using Windows tools, despite occasional lag issues. It's easier to use than other virtualization options but could improve in performance. Overall, it's a good alternative for virtualization needs. |
| IT Director at Library of Congress | 4.0 | I use Microsoft Virtual Server for application virtualization across multiple locations because it is easy to deploy and manage, improving our operational cost and efficiency. However, it needs better customization. We switched from physical servers for these benefits. |
| Co-Founder at Mandelbulb Technologies | 4.0 | In my company, we use Microsoft Virtual Server alongside Visual Studio Code for decision-making regarding PaaS or virtual machine deployment. While cost was a concern, Microsoft Fabric addresses this, potentially replacing Virtual Server with a unified service. |
| CEO at WilCom Systems Ltd | 3.5 | We find Microsoft Virtual Server valuable for its ease of use and performance, particularly with familiarity in Microsoft products. Its pay-as-you-go model offers immediate ROI. However, improving currency localization for pricing would be beneficial. We evaluated other cloud and on-premise options. |