Microsoft Virtual Server and Parallels RAS compete in virtual server solutions and application deployment. Parallels RAS seems to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of application publishing.
Features: Microsoft Virtual Server is noted for stability, security, and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. It offers flexible resource management and a quick setup, ideal for enterprises. Parallels RAS provides seamless application publishing and device compatibility, extending access across platforms without third-party tools.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Virtual Server could enhance its pricing structure, scalability, and ease of patch management. Parallels RAS might improve print management, web interface customization, and reduce update frequency. Both face pricing criticisms, but their focus areas differ.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Virtual Server supports on-premises and cloud deployment, with mixed technical support reviews. Parallels RAS also caters to both environments, praised for prompt support, though local support responsiveness could improve.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Virtual Server is seen as expensive, though it offers instant ROI through pay-as-you-go models. Parallels RAS is cost-effective, offering flexible licensing and a significant ROI by lowering operational costs compared to competitors.
We must pay for advanced technical support, and sometimes it is expensive.
For Parallels RAS, the support is rated eight out of ten.
Scalability, flexibility, and performance are key factors, indicating no significant limitations.
I can start from fifteen users and scale it to nearly any size.
There are a few features like user search, binary search, and LDAP search that have been well-implemented and are user-friendly, aiding many administrators.
Introducing a .NET experience with a drag-and-drop feature would enhance ease of report formation and monitoring tools.
A potential improvement could be reducing the dependency on Microsoft solutions for Parallels RAS.
No additional fees for maintenance or support are required.
Microsoft Virtual Server also handles a large number of users effectively, which benefits my organization.
In terms of Parallels Desktop, the coherence mode that allows Mac and Windows applications to run seamlessly side by side is highly regarded.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
