Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent Cloudpager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Ranking in Application Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Numecent Cloudpager
Ranking in Application Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft Virtual Server is 1.9%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 13.3%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

ChimeremezeNwabueze - PeerSpot reviewer
Eliminates the need for physical hardware and is not platform dependent
You can detach and reuse the storage drive without disrupting the virtual server, which is quite useful. Additionally, it provides options like network security groups to protect virtual machines from unauthorized access. The tool offers compatibility with various operating systems through the Azure Marketplace. You can access a wide range of Windows operating systems, both enterprise and commercial.
it_user749919 - PeerSpot reviewer
Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions
Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The performance and scalability offered by the tool meet our company's expectations."
"The solution provides easy monitoring and easy troubleshooting."
"It is easy to use. It offers good compatibility with other operating systems. That's one of the reasons I used it."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"The greatest aspect of the solution is its capability to be available from anywhere."
"The solution is good at allowing end users to connect anytime and anywhere."
"The solution's performance is good."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"Driver virtualisation"
 

Cons

"The solution should be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"There is room for improvement in the user interface, which could be more user-friendly."
"The pricing and scalability are areas of the product with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"In terms of what could be improved, pricing is always too high of course."
"The platform’s dashboard features could be better."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The response time from technical support could be faster."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."
"Self-service Portal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."
"It is an expensive product."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
"Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."
"The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower."
"The tool's cost has been taken care of with the help of Microsoft Fabric and with a consolidated or unified interface, where the entire product serves as a SaaS offering for the user."
"The pricing must be improved."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
One feature I would like to see is better compatibility with macOS. Due to business policies, macOS isn't currently available in the Azure Marketplace. Microsoft should come to agreement with it.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.