Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025
Microsoft Virtual Server and Numecent Cloudpager are competing in the virtualization and application delivery markets. Numecent Cloudpager seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features that justify its higher cost compared to Microsoft's offering.
Features:Microsoft Virtual Server provides strong integration capabilities within Microsoft ecosystems, ensuring straightforward connectivity for businesses utilizing their existing Microsoft solutions. It offers basic virtualization features for stable performance. Numecent Cloudpager offers faster application delivery, allowing quicker access to applications for end-users. It leverages dynamic scaling to handle varying workloads efficiently. Cloudpager enhances user experience with seamless access across devices.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Microsoft Virtual Server offers a straightforward deployment process, leveraging existing infrastructure within Windows environments, thereby reducing integration challenges. Microsoft also provides comprehensive resources for support. Numecent Cloudpager, with its cloud-based approach, simplifies deployment and maintenance, effectively reducing operational overhead. Numecent's personalized support ensures efficient issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI:Microsoft Virtual Server maintains a lower setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious organizations. However, the return on investment might be slower due to fewer capabilities. Numecent Cloudpager incurs higher initial costs but offers enhanced ROI by boosting productivity and reducing application deployment time. While Microsoft is more cost-effective initially, Cloudpager delivers long-term value through advanced features and quick benefits realization.
To learn more, read our detailed
Application Virtualization Report (Updated: December 2025).
