Microsoft Virtual Server and Citrix DaaS are key players in the virtualization market, offering server infrastructure and Desktop as a Service solutions, respectively. While Microsoft is preferred for its pricing and support effectiveness, Citrix earns higher marks for its robust features and overall product value.
Features: Microsoft Virtual Server is liked for its simplicity, scalability, and integration capabilities with existing Microsoft products, ensuring intuitive server management. Its data restoration and network integration are crucial for cloud operations. On the other hand, Citrix DaaS is noted for reliable remote access, effective application delivery, and secure computing, all essential for enterprise-level deployments. It adapts to user needs by offering application and desktop flexibility on various devices.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Virtual Server needs enhancements in user interface, network performance, security, and Linux integration. It also faces high cost and stability concerns. Citrix DaaS could improve its licensing clarity, support services, and application compatibility. Users seek better multi-environment integration and straightforward deployment processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Virtual Server is frequently implemented on-premises, with mixed reviews about customer support accessibility. Citrix DaaS, offering hybrid and public cloud deployments, generally receives positive feedback for customer service, albeit with some licensing management challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Virtual Server offers traditional licensing with one-time or annual payments, though it is noted as costly. Its ROI is quick, assisted by a pay-as-you-go model. Citrix DaaS provides flexible licensing, including concurrent and device-based options. Despite being expensive, especially with additional solutions, its comprehensive capabilities are often worth the cost for users.
