No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
OpenText SiteScope Logo

OpenText SiteScope Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope provides agentless monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering an intuitive experience with comprehensive solutions for managing APIs, URLs, and log files. It's designed for those seeking ease of use and flexibility without the need for server agents.

Get the OpenText SiteScope Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText SiteScope, Datadog, Zabbix and more!
OpenText SiteScope is the #15 ranked solution in APM tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText SiteScope an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. OpenText SiteScope is most commonly compared to Datadog: OpenText SiteScope vs Datadog. OpenText SiteScope is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 14% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText SiteScope
April 2026
Get the report
Helped 890,088 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText SiteScope reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText SiteScope mindshare

As of April 2026, the mindshare of OpenText SiteScope in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category stands at 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText SiteScope0.9%
Dynatrace5.6%
Datadog4.9%
Other88.6%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText SiteScope reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilityApr 26, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 26, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText SiteScope vs DatadogApr 26, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText SiteScope vs DynatraceApr 26, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText SiteScope vs Splunk AppDynamicsApr 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Datadog4.34.9%97%208 interviewsAdd to research
Zabbix4.22.1%95%108 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText SiteScope's most valuable features include agentless monitoring, which minimizes resource usage and complexity. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of use, and wide range of monitoring capabilities, including infrastructure and service availability. The integration with various monitoring tools and real-time alerting through email and SMS enhances operational efficiency. Built-in templates simplify configuration and deployment, while the ability to customize monitors offers flexibility across diverse environments, proving vital for infrastructure and application monitoring without requiring agent installation.
  • "The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."
  • "Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."
  • "It's user-friendly and it's very good at monitoring the infrastructure and the applications."

Room for Improvement

OpenText SiteScope requires improvements in dashboard functionality and integrations, particularly with cloud platforms and ticketing tools. Its licensing costs and current Java-based interface are seen as drawbacks, while enhanced reporting capabilities and scalability would be beneficial. Users seek better transaction tracking, out-of-the-box templates, simplified setup, and technical support. There's also a need for comprehensive API access and a consolidated management UI for ease of use across large environments.
  • "Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."
  • "The installation was a bit of a challenge. It took us almost two weeks to get it up and running."
  • "They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

ROI

OpenText SiteScope significantly improved monitoring capabilities, leading to reduced downtime and better system performance. Its customizable dashboards and alerts provided quick insights into system health, facilitating timely interventions. Businesses experienced cost savings from decreased manual monitoring efforts and fewer system issues. Enhanced visibility and control over IT infrastructure translated to more efficient operations and greater return on investment. Increased uptime and performance reliability also contributed to positive financial outcomes for organizations.

Pricing

OpenText SiteScope pricing is seen as a challenge by many users, considered expensive compared to other tools. Licensing can be complex, with models based on points or nodes. Users suggest opting for node-based licensing for better flexibility. Initial setup is reportedly easy, especially with experienced support. Some users highlight a lack of investment in new features like cloud monitoring, impacting perceived value. Consulting with account managers on licensing specifics is advised due to potential complexities.
  • "The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."
  • "I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
  • "The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support.With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

Popular Use Cases

Users primarily utilize OpenText SiteScope for infrastructure and application monitoring, including servers, network devices, and system resources. It provides agentless monitoring across various environments and platforms, supporting performance testing and availability tracking. Features include URL monitoring, database connectivity checks, and log keyword alerts. Its predefined templates enable efficient monitoring of databases, Active Directory, VMware, and more, with custom monitoring based on end-user needs and ICMP-based tasks.

Service and Support

OpenText SiteScope's support receives mixed feedback. Some rate technical support highly, citing expertise and responsiveness, while others highlight issues such as slow responses and lack of expertise. Engineering experts exist, but first-line support often falls short. Account management is praised for effective case handling. Documentation is well-organized, though improvements are needed. Interaction varies with issue complexity; simpler issues are resolved quickly, whereas complex ones require escalation. Users share diverse experiences, rating support between three and ten out of ten.

Deployment

Users found OpenText SiteScope's initial setup straightforward, quick, and easy, often completed within hours. Many reported requiring minimal configurations, though others noted challenges with customization and script requirements for complex monitoring. Installation often took one to two hours, but fully configuring and hardening could take a day or longer. Issues like administrative access for installation and complexities in upgrading were mentioned. Despite some challenges, most agreed that setup was efficient and reliable.

Scalability

Opinions on the scalability of OpenText SiteScope are mixed. While some find it highly scalable and efficient, especially in handling tasks across servers, others believe it needs improvement for more compact scaling. Users report ease of scaling horizontally with high daily demand not impacting performance. It can efficiently manage monitoring tasks, with varying user counts across organizations. Many rate its scalability positively, though infrastructure limits may affect some aspects.

Stability

Users find OpenText SiteScope generally stable with minor issues. Some experience no problems, stating it’s reliable with no crashes. Others mention specific stability concerns, such as compatibility issues with Windows servers and occasional false alerts. In dynamic environments, complexity increases with new releases. Despite isolated cases of memory leaks, stability is maintained with auto-recycling. SiteScope shows excellent reliability, rarely facing glitches or latency. Many praise its operational performance and fast incident reporting.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText SiteScope Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business76
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise116
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
10%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Performing Arts
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Government
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Museum Or Institution
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Educational Organization
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Religious Institution
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%

Compare OpenText SiteScope with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText SiteScope

SiteScope is known for its agentless architecture that facilitates seamless monitoring across a range of technologies including AWS, VMware, and APIs. Users benefit from ready-to-use templates and an intuitive dashboard. Despite its flexibility, SiteScope has challenges with integration and modern features like cloud and DevOps monitoring. The Java interface is slow and setup can be cumbersome, with costly licensing and room for improvement in reporting and scalability.

What are the key features of OpenText SiteScope?
  • Agentless Architecture: Eliminates the need for server agents, minimizing intrusion.
  • Ready-to-Use Templates: Simplifies monitoring setup across different environments.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports server, database, URL, and API monitoring.
  • Integration Capabilities: Works with AWS, VMware, and other technologies.
  • Intuitive Dashboard: Provides easy-to-understand data visualization.
What benefits and ROI can be expected?
  • Cost Efficiency: Agentless setup reduces operational costs.
  • Flexibility: Supports multiple technologies and environments.
  • Time Management: Predefined templates save setup time.
  • Performance Assurance: Ensures consistent performance with synthetic monitoring.
  • Operational Insight: Enhances decision-making through comprehensive data visualization.

OpenText SiteScope is implemented in industries like healthcare and government organizations for maintaining system performance and uptime. It supports monitoring across platforms, including Linux, Windows, and VMware, enabling users to address infrastructure and application monitoring needs without agent-related challenges.

OpenText SiteScope was previously known as Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope.

OpenText SiteScope customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Related questions

  • 128
Differences between SiteScope and dynaTrace?
  • 125
When evaluating Application Performance Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 174
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
  • 107
What solution would you recommend for monitoring traffic utilization of leased lines?
  • 119
How Much Should I Budget for an APM Solution?
  • 91
Which is the best AANPM product? Should we be considering anything besides for Riverbed?
  • 113
Who Uses APM?
  • 93
What is your favorite tool for Application Performance Monitoring?
  • 120
How does synthetic monitoring differ from real user monitoring?
  • 128
Differences between SiteScope and dynaTrace?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Datadog vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Datadog vs OpenText SiteScope
Zabbix vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Zabbix vs OpenText SiteScope
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope
New Relic vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
New Relic vs OpenText SiteScope
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope
Splunk Observability Cloud vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs OpenText SiteScope
Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope
Azure Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Azure Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope
Elastic Observability vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Elastic Observability vs OpenText SiteScope
Sentry vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Sentry vs OpenText SiteScope
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs OpenText SiteScope
BMC TrueSight vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
BMC TrueSight vs OpenText SiteScope
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText SiteScope
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope
See all alternatives
 
OpenText SiteScope Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd5.0We use OpenText SiteScope for custom monitoring such as SSL and keyword monitoring, finding its agentless setup efficient. However, reporting features need enhancement for better historical performance data. Integration with other applications is effective.
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone4.0I’ve used OpenText SiteScope for seven years to monitor infrastructure and applications. Its alerting and benchmarking features are valuable, though integration with tools like Remedy and cloud environments could improve. Overall, it’s stable and effective.
Database and Opentext Documentum Support at Metrocom Global Solusi, PT.4.5I've used OpenText Documentum since 2018 for secure document storage, workflow automation, and collaboration. It’s reliable, though the classic UI feels outdated. Support is solid, and despite high costs, its integration and reporting features are valuable.
Senior Engineer at Elm Co.5.0I use OpenText SiteScope for IT availability monitoring, mainly with the NOC team to ensure uptime and URL monitoring. It's agentless and flexible, but the Java-based interface is slow and could be more user-friendly.
Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company4.5I use OpenText SiteScope to manage processes across different systems efficiently. It allows me to automate tasks using scripts and templates, increasing productivity. However, compliance issues sometimes hinder interventions. I previously used Telen and NetCommitHub before switching for specific capabilities.
Senior Service Analyst at Exelon3.5I find Micro Focus SiteScope's out-of-the-box monitoring good, rating it 7/10, despite complex upgrades and false alerts. However, its steep cost and mixed support are driving my company's migration to more cost-effective solutions like Nagios.
System Engineer at Najtech4.0I use OpenText SiteScope for monitoring infrastructure and applications, finding its agentless setup and integration with OBM valuable despite needing improvements in reporting and dashboard capabilities. I've also used BMC Truesight, but SiteScope is easier to use.
Senior monitoring engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5I use this solution for monitoring internal URLs, certificates, and databases; it's stable, scalable, and easy to use. However, it lacks central management for multiple deployments, has difficult upgrades, and complex licensing, though it performs my essential tasks very well.