Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kubernetes Logo

Top 10 Kubernetes Alternatives

Vendor: Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Kubernetes Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kubernetes based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Cloud, VMware Tanzu Platform, and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kubernetes surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled scalability, automated deployment, and efficient management of containerized applications, enabling seamless updates, self-healing, service discovery, and robust orchestration, transforming complex infrastructure into dynamic, resilient environments that enhance productivity and innovation.

Kubernetes Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kubernetes, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Kubernetes excels in container management with flexibility across platforms. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides strong integration within Azure for comprehensive security. Kubernetes is cost-effective as an open-source option, while Microsoft Defender offers extensive security features but can be costly.
Download Kubernetes vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Kubernetes has minimal setup costs making it cost-effective, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a higher initial setup investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes has minimal setup costs making it cost-effective, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a higher initial setup investment.
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Kubernetes excels in scalability and automation, ideal for complex microservice deployments, and offers flexibility through open-source innovations. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Platform integrates smoothly with vSphere, providing an enterprise-grade solution with strong support and comprehensive virtualization across networking and storage.
Download Kubernetes vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Kubernetes offers lower setup costs, making it a cost-effective option for businesses, while VMware Tanzu Platform typically involves higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes offers lower setup costs, making it a cost-effective option for businesses, while VMware Tanzu Platform typically involves higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
4.2 out of 5
Kubernetes offers scalability and automation for flexible microservices deployment with community support. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift emphasizes security, integrated tools, and enterprise support. Kubernetes suits those leveraging open-source advantage, while OpenShift appeals to enterprises valuing comprehensive features and vendor support.
Download Kubernetes vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report
Kubernetes offers a cost advantage with lower initial setup expenses, while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform involves higher upfront costs for comprehensive enterprise features.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes offers a cost advantage with lower initial setup expenses, while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform involves higher upfront costs for comprehensive enterprise features.
Kubernetes Logo
Amazon EKS
4.3 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
Amazon EKS
4.3 out of 5
Kubernetes offers extensive open-source community support and flexibility across clouds. In comparison, Amazon EKS provides seamless AWS integration and reduced management overhead. Tech buyers may prefer Kubernetes for its adaptability, while others might choose Amazon EKS for its ease within AWS environments.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Kubernetes Report
Kubernetes offers flexibility with no setup cost, while Amazon EKS requires an additional fee, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Kubernetes over EKS.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes offers flexibility with no setup cost, while Amazon EKS requires an additional fee, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Kubernetes over EKS.
Kubernetes Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides strong Kubernetes integration with features like persistent storage and easy scaling, appealing to those with limited Kubernetes knowledge. In comparison, Kubernetes offers scalability and container orchestration, appealing to complex architectures requiring advanced functions.
Download Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers competitive setup costs, while Kubernetes may involve higher initial investments. The cost difference can play a crucial role in decision-making for organizations evaluating budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers competitive setup costs, while Kubernetes may involve higher initial investments. The cost difference can play a crucial role in decision-making for organizations evaluating budget constraints.
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
3.8 out of 5
Kubernetes is ideal for those seeking an open-source solution with rich cloud integrations and scalability features. In comparison, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine attracts users needing seamless integration within Nutanix infrastructure, offering straightforward deployment and simplified management, especially advantageous for users less familiar with Kubernetes complexities.
Download Kubernetes vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report
Kubernetes often incurs lower initial setup costs due to its open-source nature, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE may involve higher setup expenses because of its integrated enterprise features.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes often incurs lower initial setup costs due to its open-source nature, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE may involve higher setup expenses because of its integrated enterprise features.
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine
4.0 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine provides managed services for easy deployment and management with integration into Google's ecosystem. In comparison, Kubernetes offers flexibility with open-source contributions and migration ease, though it demands more management knowledge, suitable for users needing scalability across multiple platforms.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Kubernetes Report
Google Kubernetes Engine offers a streamlined setup with potentially high initial costs compared to Kubernetes, which may involve lower initial expenses but requires more manual configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine offers a streamlined setup with potentially high initial costs compared to Kubernetes, which may involve lower initial expenses but requires more manual configurations.
Kubernetes Logo
Portainer
4.0 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
Portainer
4.0 out of 5
Portainer offers a streamlined approach for managing Docker containers, enhancing efficiencies with features like simplified deployment and user management. It is easy to use but could improve in documentation and network security options. Portainer suits various industries seeking to efficiently handle containerized applications.
View comparison
Kubernetes Logo
Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Kubernetes offers scalability and self-healing for orchestration in containerized environments. In comparison, Komodor provides real-time diagnostics, improving incident response. Kubernetes benefits from community support, while Komodor emphasizes ease of setup and targeted support, enhancing efficiency in managing Kubernetes operations.
Download Komodor vs. Kubernetes Report
Kubernetes has a higher initial setup cost compared to Komodor, which is more budget-friendly for organizations looking to manage container orchestration efficiently. Both solutions offer distinct pricing advantages based on their specific features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes has a higher initial setup cost compared to Komodor, which is more budget-friendly for organizations looking to manage container orchestration efficiently. Both solutions offer distinct pricing advantages based on their specific features and capabilities.
Kubernetes Logo
HashiCorp Nomad
4.0 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
HashiCorp Nomad
4.0 out of 5
HashiCorp Nomad excels in simplicity and flexibility, making it ideal for quick setups and budget-focused organizations. In comparison, Kubernetes provides extensive features and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking complex, long-term growth capabilities. Each solution suits different operational and financial priorities.
Download HashiCorp Nomad vs. Kubernetes Report
HashiCorp Nomad offers a streamlined setup process, minimizing initial costs, while Kubernetes may involve higher setup costs due to its complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
HashiCorp Nomad offers a streamlined setup process, minimizing initial costs, while Kubernetes may involve higher setup costs due to its complexity.
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)
4.0 out of 5
Kubernetes offers flexibility and scalability with open-source community support, suiting experienced tech teams. In comparison, Nutanix Kubernetes Platform simplifies operations with integrated infrastructure management and enhanced support, appealing to enterprises needing streamlined deployment and seeking robust capabilities for large-scale implementations.
Download Kubernetes vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) Report
Kubernetes offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) provides more robust deployment features at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) provides more robust deployment features at a higher initial expense.
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
3.5 out of 5

Accelerate your journey to hybrid cloud with the industry’s first enterprise-grade container software platform for cloud-native and distributed non-cloud native applications.

Download HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Kubernetes Report
View comparison
Kubernetes Logo
Kubernetes Logo
NGINX Ingress Controller
1 out of 5
NGINX Ingress Controller is a powerful tool that enables organizations to manage and route traffic to their Kubernetes clusters. It acts as a load balancer and reverses proxy for incoming traffic, allowing for efficient and secure communication between clients and backend services. 
The most useful functionality of the solution is its ability to provide advanced traffic management features such as SSL termination, URL rewriting, and session persistence. By using NGINX Ingress Controller, organizations can improve the performance and reliability of their applications, reduce downtime, and enhance security.
View comparison
Kubernetes Logo
Diamanti
1 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
Diamanti
1 out of 5
Diamanti appliance is purpose-built for containerized applications that combines the ease of hyperconverged infrastructure with the unparalleled performance and efficiency of bare-metal containers. Diamanti addresses the unique requirements of containerized applications, ensuring network interoperability and persistent storage. Diamanti virtualizes network and storage for containers using a built-in PCIe converged I/O controller in every appliance to guarantee application performance without code changes or customization. The PCIe architecture delivers order-of-magnitude latency improvement compared with traditional shared-storage systems and software overlays.
View comparison
Kubernetes Logo
Replicated
1 out of 5
Kubernetes Logo
Replicated
1 out of 5

Replicated is the modern way to ship multi-prem software. Replicated gives software vendors a container-based platform for easily deploying cloud native applications inside customers'​ environments to provide greater security and control.

View comparison

Related categories

Container Management
Vulnerability Management
Container Security