We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the scalability."
"The scalability seems quite good."
"The easy management of containers is one of the main features I have found useful."
"There's a lot of community support if you need to get help."
"The solution has many valuable features but the most impressive is the ability to scale an application and continuously monitor if all the components of the application are functioning correctly."
"The ease of use if the solution is a very valuable aspect for us."
"You have different pods that interact with each other, so you can identify problems with one pod and replace it."
"This solution is cost effective and fast. We are able to use Kubernetes to orchestrate hundreds of container images which has been a major benefit."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"The support could be faster at resolving issues."
"The tool needs to improve its UI. The tool is very complex and basic."
"Kubernetes should improve its consistency across different types of deployments. My customers tell me that they get much better performance when Kubernetes is deployed on VM versus PaaS services from Azure."
"The price is something they need to improve."
"The solution has some issues regarding availability during high loads. Worker nodes are sometimes unavailable, affecting the overall availability of the applications. This is a bug or underlying problem with the tool, and Azure and other providers are looking into improving this by releasing new versions of Kubernetes that fix some of the platform's issues."
"It would be very interesting if they could introduce a template engine to set dynamic values in the deployment time. It would be ideal if it could be native in Kubernetes as it would be much easier."
"In the financial service sector, I'd rate scalability an eight out of ten. But do it in a controlled manner, not auto-scaling. If your application has a bug and you enable the autoscaler, it will spike your costs. If someone deploys an application with a bug, that's automatically a problem."
"They should make documentation simpler for learning."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 67 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Docker and Rancher Labs, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Portainer.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
