We performed a comparison between Kubernetes and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If you don't have resources, you can certainly add another worker node and expand the cluster."
"A good interface, better than comparable solutions."
"All the current features are quite harmonic."
"This product has a rich toolset from the community including CNI plug-ins, Helm packages, operators, dashboards, various integrations, etc."
"This solution is cost effective and fast. We are able to use Kubernetes to orchestrate hundreds of container images which has been a major benefit."
"The most valuable feature is the Zero Touch Operations, which involves a new way of performing operations and support. We do not have to do maintenance, the operations are very simple."
"Provides auto rollback and scale-up and scale-down functionalities."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the scalability."
"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."
"A great UI with very good integrations."
"Rancher Labs is a very user-friendly tool."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution has a lot of good features, such as you can access the console and edit through the GUI. The dashboard and the UI are designed well, user-friendly, and easy to manage, and access."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an open-source solution that is easy to deploy."
"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."
"The product is simple to use for a beginner."
"Honestly, there is not much I like about Kubernetes. It's very complicated to deal with. I just do it because I have to."
"It's complex to manage and requires specialists."
"The tool needs to improve its UI. The tool is very complex and basic."
"I think that the GUI dashboard in Kubernetes is very simple and that there are no great options."
"Kubernetes can be used for most companies, but for some companies that may be too small, it may not be worth the investment, as it is expensive."
"The solution can be quite complex for many users."
"The pricing could be improved. It would be ideal if it was a bit less."
"They should make documentation simpler for learning."
"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."
"Could be more intuitive."
"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect."
"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."
"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."
"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."
"We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated."
"The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit."
Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 67 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 12 reviews. Kubernetes is rated 8.6, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and HashiCorp Nomad, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, OpenShift Container Platform, Amazon EKS, Docker and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform. See our Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.