No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: Ivanti
4.5 out of 5
    Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

    Top Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Competitors

    Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include NetScaler, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), and NGINX Plus. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] surpasses its competitors by delivering advanced security features such as robust traffic management, real-time threat intelligence, and seamless application protection, ensuring optimal performance and comprehensive coverage for web applications.

    Ivanti Alternatives Report

    Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Ivanti, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
    Get the alternatives report
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    NetScaler
    4.2 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    NetScaler
    4.2 out of 5
    NetScaler excels in network optimization with high availability and SSL offloading, attracting those prioritizing performance. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers advanced threat protection and real-time monitoring, appealing to security-focused buyers seeking robust security features.
    NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], making Ivanti the more cost-effective option for setup expenses.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], making Ivanti the more cost-effective option for setup expenses.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    4.1 out of 5
    F5 BIG-IP LTM excels in traffic management with intelligent load balancing and extensive customization options, supported by reliable customer service. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers superior security features and straightforward deployment, attracting customers prioritizing application security despite potential upfront costs.
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) features a higher setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers a more cost-effective setup alternative, highlighting significant pricing differences between the two solutions.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) features a higher setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers a more cost-effective setup alternative, highlighting significant pricing differences between the two solutions.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    NGINX Plus
    4.4 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    NGINX Plus
    4.4 out of 5
    NGINX Plus excels in traffic management with features like load balancing, making it ideal for scalable solutions. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] focuses on robust security features, appealing to those prioritizing built-in application layer protection despite end-of-life status.
    NGINX Plus has a higher setup cost than Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], offering comprehensive features for enterprise-level applications, whereas Ivanti's lower setup cost caters to those needing a cost-effective solution.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    NGINX Plus has a higher setup cost than Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], offering comprehensive features for enterprise-level applications, whereas Ivanti's lower setup cost caters to those needing a cost-effective solution.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    HAProxy
    4.2 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    HAProxy
    4.2 out of 5
    HAProxy offers cost-effective performance and reliability, attracting small to mid-sized businesses. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall (EOL) provides extensive security features, appealing to enterprises needing robust protection. HAProxy's customer support is more responsive, while Ivanti emphasizes comprehensive security documentation.
    HAProxy offers a minimal setup cost advantage compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], which involves a more significant financial commitment upfront. This cost difference highlights HAProxy as a more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited resources.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    HAProxy offers a minimal setup cost advantage compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], which involves a more significant financial commitment upfront. This cost difference highlights HAProxy as a more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited resources.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
    3.7 out of 5
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ideal for users prioritizing seamless integration and cost-effectiveness within Azure. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] attracts those needing advanced threat protection and customizable security policies, offering superior security despite higher setup costs.
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has no upfront setup costs, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] incurs higher initial expenses. Azure's cost-effectiveness is a key differentiator in establishing the application gateway.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has no upfront setup costs, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] incurs higher initial expenses. Azure's cost-effectiveness is a key differentiator in establishing the application gateway.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Radware Alteon
    4.3 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Radware Alteon
    4.3 out of 5
    Radware Alteon excels with its performance and long-term support, offering competitive pricing and seamless deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] entices buyers with its robust feature set and lower initial costs, despite lacking ongoing support and updates.
    Radware Alteon typically involves lower setup costs, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] can be higher due to its comprehensive features.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Radware Alteon typically involves lower setup costs, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] can be higher due to its comprehensive features.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    NGINX App Protect
    4.1 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    NGINX App Protect
    4.1 out of 5
    NGINX App Protect integrates within NGINX environments for quick threat mitigation. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers extensive protocol support, ensuring comprehensive protection. NGINX attracts existing users with seamless deployment, while Ivanti's advanced features justify its higher cost for broader security needs.
    NGINX App Protect offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] involves potentially higher setup expenses.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    NGINX App Protect offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] involves potentially higher setup expenses.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Kemp LoadMaster
    4.7 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Kemp LoadMaster
    4.7 out of 5
    Kemp LoadMaster offers cost-effective network management with straightforward functionality, ideal for simplicity seekers. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] delivers advanced security features, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive threat protection despite potential deployment complexity and higher initial costs.
    Kemp LoadMaster offers a competitive setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] presents higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency difference between the solutions.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Kemp LoadMaster offers a competitive setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] presents higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency difference between the solutions.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Radware Cloud WAF Service
    4.5 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall offers straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service presents advanced features like adaptive security and enhanced threat intelligence appealing to organizations prioritizing cutting-edge security and flexibility.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] requires a substantial upfront setup cost, unlike Radware Cloud WAF Service, which offers lower initial expenses.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] requires a substantial upfront setup cost, unlike Radware Cloud WAF Service, which offers lower initial expenses.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Sucuri
    4.2 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Sucuri
    4.2 out of 5
    Sucuri provides cost-effective web security with impressive malware detection and customer support. In comparison, Ivanti offers sophisticated features like advanced threat protection and analytics, which attract buyers needing comprehensive security. Sucuri's simplicity appeals to budgets, while Ivanti targets those seeking premium capabilities.
    Sucuri offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, contrasting with Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], which incurs initial setup charges.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Sucuri offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, contrasting with Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], which incurs initial setup charges.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    VMWare Avi Load Balancer
    4.0 out of 5
    VMWare Avi Load Balancer attracts tech buyers with its automation prowess and responsive support. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] appeals with its strong security features, offering investment recovery despite its end-of-life status and more complex setup.
    VMWare Avi Load Balancer has a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], highlighting a more cost-effective initial investment for businesses.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    VMWare Avi Load Balancer has a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], highlighting a more cost-effective initial investment for businesses.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Wallarm NG WAF
    4.3 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Wallarm NG WAF
    4.3 out of 5
    Wallarm NG WAF excels with AI-enhanced threat detection and seamless cloud deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall offers broad compatibility and a straightforward interface. Wallarm suits those prioritizing AI and support, while Ivanti appeals to businesses valuing integration and lower initial costs.
    Wallarm NG WAF has a cost-effective setup compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], highlighting significant differences in initial pricing.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Wallarm NG WAF has a cost-effective setup compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL], highlighting significant differences in initial pricing.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)
    3.8 out of 5
    Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers advanced threat detection and agile deployment for tech buyers seeking flexibility. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall provides extensive policy-based features and customization. Fastly focuses on adaptive security, whereas Ivanti appeals to those valuing comprehensive, albeit static, solutions.
    The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers a lower setup cost compared to the Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall, which requires a higher initial investment. This cost difference underscores the varying budget requirements between these two security solutions.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers a lower setup cost compared to the Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall, which requires a higher initial investment. This cost difference underscores the varying budget requirements between these two security solutions.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
    3.8 out of 5
    Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is chosen for its robust security and ongoing support. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall offers sophisticated traffic management and rule configuration, appealing to users prioritizing custom security measures despite its EOL status and lack of iterative support.
    The setup cost for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is more competitive, whereas the Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] is higher due to additional feature requirements.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    The setup cost for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is more competitive, whereas the Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] is higher due to additional feature requirements.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Amazon Elastic Load Balancing
    4.3 out of 5
    Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers ease of deployment and cost efficiency, making it an attractive choice for companies seeking scalable traffic management. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] appeals with advanced security and compliance, suitable for organizations prioritizing robust threat protection.
    Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers competitive setup costs compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall, which may present relatively higher initial expenses.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers competitive setup costs compared to Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall, which may present relatively higher initial expenses.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Airlock
    5.0 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Airlock
    5.0 out of 5
    Airlock emphasizes affordability and seamless integration, attracting security-focused and budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] appeals to those valuing advanced features and customization, offering comprehensive threat protection and yielding substantial ROI for technology-driven organizations.
    Airlock has a moderate setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers a more economical setup. This highlights a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Airlock has a moderate setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers a more economical setup. This highlights a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Akamai Ion
    3.8 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    Akamai Ion
    3.8 out of 5
    Akamai Ion, emphasizing performance with scalable content delivery, offers cost-effective pricing and efficient cloud integration. In comparison, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall provides deep security features, appealing to those prioritizing threat management despite higher costs for robust on-premise deployment and comprehensive security assurances.
    Akamai Ion has a moderate setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] is known for its lower initial investment. Akamai's pricing model indicates additional scalability benefits compared to Ivanti's concluded support lifecycle.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Akamai Ion has a moderate setup cost, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] is known for its lower initial investment. Akamai's pricing model indicates additional scalability benefits compared to Ivanti's concluded support lifecycle.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    BotGuard
    1 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Logo
    BotGuard
    1 out of 5
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] offers cost-effective security with reliable support and traditional deployment ease. In comparison, BotGuard provides innovative features like advanced bot detection and seamless integration, attracting buyers seeking modern, versatile security solutions despite its higher initial investment.
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] has a higher setup cost, while BotGuard offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant price difference between the two.
    View comparison
    Pricing
    Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] has a higher setup cost, while BotGuard offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant price difference between the two.

    Related categories

    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Network Management Applications