F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

F5 and Ivanti are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. F5 is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.2, while Ivanti is ranked #17. F5 holds a 11.6% mindshare in ADC, compared to Ivanti’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...

Read 124 F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

13,951 Views
9,068 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Ivanti Virtual Web Applicat...

1,897 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...

Ivanti Virtual Web Applicat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 2, 2026

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager and Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall compete in traffic management and web security. F5 BIG-IP LTM is favored for customer satisfaction, pricing, and support, while Ivanti's features are compelling.

Features: F5 BIG-IP LTM offers advanced load balancing, SSL offloading, and adaptive traffic management. Ivanti focuses on robust web application protection, including end-of-life security measures and comprehensive threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IP LTM is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Ivanti presents a complex setup but benefits from solid technical support.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IP LTM has a higher setup cost but ensures a strong return on investment via its extensive features. Ivanti offers a lower initial cost with ROI linked to its specialized security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

124

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Virtual Web Applicat...

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (44th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is 11.6%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] is 2.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	11.6%
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall	2.5%
Other	85.9%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

edshyaa

Network Engineer at Stryker

Load balancing has improved traffic distribution and currently supports high availability upgrades

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) offers effective load balancing methods that help distribute traffic across our servers, whether we have two or several. This load balancing feature stands out as it is the fundamental work we do with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). While I recognize there are many features, such as iRules, which I have not explored yet, we primarily work on VIPs, pool members, and traffic distribution. The load balancing algorithms' flexibility makes them very useful for our team, enabling us to choose different servers and manage load effectively. We use various methods based on user or application requirements, making the algorithms set up by F5 in the backend quite helpful. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities. We avoid traffic overload on individual servers by placing backend servers behind F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) VIP. This load balancing helps us manage traffic effectively. Since the configuration of the I-series, we have had smooth performance, and with the recent migration to the R-series, it is working faster than before, providing positive outcomes for our operations. Since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance; it is user-friendly and handles traffic efficiently. The upgrading process is different as we create tenants and a main host. R-series has better CPU and memory, leading to higher throughput with minimal downtime, making it a significant improvement over the I-series.

Read full review

Mike Duffy

Consultant at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Good feature set and is simple to deploy

In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else. We sort of stopped deploying them because of that. There are additional costs to the standard licensing. There are bandwidth prices. The feature set is quite good. We've been told to stop using them because of the price. If they can do something to address that I believe it would be better. On the latest version they've got a community edition, which is quite a good bandwidth, but in essence, it's to address the entry-level price. When you get to 10 gig bandwidth, it's way too expensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities, helping us avoid traffic overload on individual servers and manage traffic effectively, and since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance as it is user-friendly, handles traffic efficiently, and offers better CPU and memory for higher throughput with minimal downtime."

"We can load balance the request to servers, which was the main reason we bought the product."

"Initial setup is easy and pretty standard."

"It is a very good, flexible solution, and it helps us to catch up on flaws in our partner solutions on top of its load balancing feature."

"The product is quite flexible."

"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) improves the resilience and quality of the application itself, the speed and the user experience for the application. The data that the users need from the application is actually acquired faster. So, it provides faster data acquisition."

"We are using Application Security Manager (ASM) as a web application firewall, where there is a security signature to avoid a web level breach."

"The most valuable feature of F5 BIG-IP LTM is brand image and recognition and the application delivery controller."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pros

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."

Cons

"F5 has another solution to load balance servers on the cloud, which they got after the purchase of NGINX. It is deployed as Kubernetes or something like that, but the problem now is that they have two solutions for two situations. They should make F5 deployable on the cloud."

"It reaches a point where scaling is no longer possible."

"I would like them to have more flexible models."

"Lacking in free training to help users understand the product more, so they would know how to correctly use it. Like other vendors and their products, becoming more proactive is an area for improvement."

"Technical support could be improved."

"The room for improvement is that the product is a little costly."

"They are expensive."

"There are some aspects of F5 BIG-IP that could be improved, the main one being virtual machine support. We have seen that even with the virtual editions, there are some things that we would like to do that are currently not possible with virtual machines."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) cons

"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Check other vendors like Cisco, Citrix or A10 Networks. There are plenty in the market with which you can achieve same thing."

"There are no additional fees to the standard licensing fee; everything is paid once."

"The pricing is inclusive of many features."

"There are additional costs depending on what modules or what functionality is required."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"In my view, the cost is somewhat on the higher side. There are discounts available, but I wouldn't say it's overpriced. It's not cheap either, and the value for money is a bit higher from that perspective."

"I use a yearly subscription, which is the most expensive one now compared to its competitors."

"Though functionality is high, its cost can be considered slightly higher than its competitors."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

19%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	62
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	86

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) could improve file upload speeds when opening cases and attaching files; sometimes, downloading files like QKView takes time, depending on size. I expect faste...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IP?

My main use case for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is placing our applications on F5 and the backend servers on the pool. We also regularly renew SSL certificates before they expire, usuall...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?

The product is costly. I would rate the price a five out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 6% of the time

HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 6% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 5% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Competitors

HAProxy vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

NGINX App Protect vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

NetScaler vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

September 2026

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) report

Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

September 2026

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] report

Download Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] product report

Also Known As

F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP

Pulse vWAF, Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager

Overview

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) specializes in load balancing, iRules, and application security. It provides flexibility and stability, supporting SSL offloading and enhancing application performance and reliability with low downtime.

F5 BIG-IP LTM is designed for efficient traffic management and security. Its intuitive interface allows users to customize traffic through iRules and ensures stable application delivery. Its performance stability and ability to inspect TLS traffic, along with web application firewall features, make it preferred for consistent application delivery. While praised for its capabilities, users note its challenges with complex configuration and management. Calls for streamlined processes, training, support, better logging, and cloud integration highlight areas for improvement.

What are the key features of F5 BIG-IP LTM?

Load Balancing: Distributes HTTP and HTTPS traffic to ensure high availability.
iRules: Allows for customized traffic management.
Application Security: Includes TLS inspection and web application firewall capabilities.
SSL Offloading: Reduces server load by handling SSL processing.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Performance Stability: Ensures high reliability and less downtime.
Flexibility: Offers customizable traffic management through iRules.
Security: Provides strong protection against application attacks.
Network Management Efficiency: Simplifies traffic distribution and infrastructure management.

F5 BIG-IP LTM is widely used in industries requiring robust application delivery and security, such as finance and healthcare. It supports load balancing and traffic management across different environments and acts as a reverse proxy, helping companies secure their infrastructure against cyber threats while facilitating high availability and scalability.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall offers robust security to protect web applications from vulnerabilities, ensuring data integrity and compliance with standards.

It provides advanced security features designed to safeguard applications against modern threats. Customizable and flexible, it supports diverse environments without requiring major infrastructure changes. This enhances agility and allows for tailored protection strategies to suit specific business contexts.

What are the key features of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall?

Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates potential threats with precision.
Data Compliance: Ensures adherence to data protection regulations.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing organizational demands.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the administration and monitoring of security settings.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced protection against vulnerabilities leads to fewer breaches.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses associated with security incidents.
Operational Agility: Accelerates deployment and reduces configuration time.
User Satisfaction: Positive reviews indicate reliability and ease of use.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is implemented across multiple industries, including finance and healthcare, to ensure sensitive data remains secure and operations comply with industry regulations. Its ability to adapt to sector-specific challenges makes it a valued tool for IT professionals seeking advanced protection without sacrificing performance.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.

Gilt Groupe

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.