IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) offers an integrated platform with customizable workflows, Scrum planning tools, and resource management features, enhancing project execution and collaboration.



| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) | 4.0% |
| Jira | 14.7% |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 10.8% |
| Other | 70.5% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites | Dec 30, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Dec 30, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Jira | Dec 30, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Dec 30, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) | Dec 30, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 10.8% | 95% | 136 interviewsAdd to research |
| Jira | 4.1 | 14.7% | 91% | 276 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 48 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 53 |
| Large Enterprise | 203 |
ELM supports Agile and Scrum project management through its integration with tools like Git and IBM Doors, providing cataloging, traceability, and reporting capabilities. While users benefit from requirement management and dashboard functionalities, the interface and reporting could be improved for better navigation and customization. Its cloud-based architecture facilitates compliance and auditing, making it a valuable tool for engineering teams focusing on configuration and version control.
What are the essential features of IBM ELM?ELM is widely used in the automotive and manufacturing sectors for managing requirements and monitoring performance. Engineering teams leverage ELM for Agile methodologies, with central teams deploying it for end-to-end development processes including requirement gathering and backlog management. Stability and improved integration support remain critical implementation areas, along with enhanced governance features for comprehensive application.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) was previously known as IBM Engineering Rhapsody, Rational ALM, MKS.
Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH | 3.0 | I primarily use IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management alongside DOORS for complex software presentations, as its automation greatly aids analysis. However, improvements in usability and better integration with Rhapsody are needed compared to user-friendly competitors like Enterprise Architect. |
| Principal Consultant at byte | 4.0 | I've used IBM ELM for 15 years; it's great for regulated industries and strong in requirements management, but the outdated UI and poor support hurt usability. It's powerful but often too complex for agile, mid-sized companies. |
| Heaad of Automation Devision at Alstom Ferroviaria S.p.A. | 3.5 | I use IBM Rational ALM in our manufacturing company to manage requirements and testing. Its integration with other IBM tools and reporting capabilities add value. However, the complex user interface could be simplified for non-technical users. |
| Product Owner at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees | 2.5 | I use IBM Rational ALM to plan development, valuing its customizability and strong compliance features, though it lacks sophisticated reporting, user-friendly GUI, and effective planning tools. I'm currently evaluating Jira due to these limitations. |
| Global IT Director of Digital Platforms. Digital and Connected Commerce at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 2.0 | Our team of 15 to 20 software engineers used IBM Rational ALM for testing. While the cloud-based feature is valuable, interconnectivity issues and the need for better trace matrix ability exist. We saw no ROI and transitioned to Atlassian. |
| Senior Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.5 | I use IBM Rational ALM for end-to-end development solutions with a valuable global configuration feature. However, it needs to be more lightweight by removing unused features. Overall, it's effective without considering alternate solutions or specific cloud providers. |
| Owner at Qstec | 4.0 | I oversee a team using IBM Rational ALM, finding its workflow capabilities enhance collaboration and integration between development and production teams. However, development features could improve. I haven't used similar solutions before IBM Rational ALM. |
| Tool Manager at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | No summary available |