Top 10 IBM Netezza Performance Server Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

3.9 out of 5

45 reviews
89% willing to recommend

Top IBM Netezza Performance Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Netezza Performance Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Teradata, Snowflake, and Oracle Exadata. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. IBM Netezza Performance Server surpasses its competitors by delivering high-speed analytics with advanced in-database processing, seamless integration, and exceptional scalability, empowering businesses to handle complex queries efficiently and drive data-driven insights for superior decision-making.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata excels in handling complex queries with its smart optimizer and parallel architecture. In comparison, Netezza, with its appliance-based model, is ideal for high-speed analytics. Teradata's robust analytics and adaptability appeal to large enterprises, while Netezza offers efficient and straightforward deployment.

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Teradata Report

Pricing

Teradata's setup costs can be high, while IBM Netezza Performance Server offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between these data warehousing solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Teradata's setup costs can be high, while IBM Netezza Performance Server offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between these data warehousing solutions.

Snowflake

4.2 out of 5

Snowflake

4.2 out of 5

IBM Netezza Performance Server excels with high-speed, on-premises performance and advanced analytics for structured data. In comparison, Snowflake operates in the cloud with flexible pricing, supporting both structured and semi-structured data integration and real-time data sharing, appealing for dynamic scaling needs.

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Snowflake Report

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server offers a high initial setup cost, while Snowflake often provides a more budget-friendly setup expense.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server offers a high initial setup cost, while Snowflake often provides a more budget-friendly setup expense.

Oracle Exadata

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Exadata

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Exadata excels with automatic tuning and efficient SQL operations, ideal for large-scale applications. In comparison, IBM Netezza focuses on simplicity and high-speed deployment. Tech buyers choose Exadata for comprehensive packages and Netezza for cost-effective, straightforward solutions.

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Oracle Exadata Report

Pricing

Oracle Exadata incurs higher setup costs, offering robust infrastructure, while IBM Netezza Performance Server provides a more budget-friendly setup, focusing on efficient performance.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Exadata incurs higher setup costs, offering robust infrastructure, while IBM Netezza Performance Server provides a more budget-friendly setup, focusing on efficient performance.

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

4.1 out of 5

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

4.1 out of 5

IBM Netezza excels in query optimization and data compression but faces scalability challenges. In comparison, Vertica offers robust analytical functions and flexible deployment for complex ML needs, though it could improve concurrency and integration. Each solution appeals to different big data strategies.

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) Report

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server has a significant setup cost, while OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) offers a more budget-friendly initialization. This cost difference is a key consideration for budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

4.0 out of 5

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

4.0 out of 5

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions highlights MPP architecture for fast data processing and supports ANSI SQL, Python, and C++, advantageous for complex analytics. In comparison, IBM Netezza delivers rapid query performance with simple integration and efficient response, suitable for streamlined operations.

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report

Pricing

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM Netezza Performance Server, which offers a more economical installation option for businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM Netezza Performance Server, which offers a more economical installation option for businesses.

Apache Hadoop

3.9 out of 5

Apache Hadoop

3.9 out of 5

IBM Netezza Performance Server offers rapid analytics and effortless administration, appealing to users needing performant appliance-based solutions. In comparison, Apache Hadoop's distributed processing and open-source nature suit organizations with the expertise and need for large-scale, adaptable data handling.

Download Apache Hadoop vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server Report

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server involves a higher setup cost than Apache Hadoop, which offers a more affordable initial deployment, making it an attractive choice for cost-sensitive projects.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server involves a higher setup cost than Apache Hadoop, which offers a more affordable initial deployment, making it an attractive choice for cost-sensitive projects.

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera excels in integration within Hadoop ecosystems, ideal for those valuing flexible deployment and robust security. In comparison, IBM Netezza focuses on high-speed analytics and data warehousing, appealing to organizations that prioritize performance with innovations like FPGAs and MPP architecture.

Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server Report

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop typically involves higher setup costs compared to IBM Netezza Performance Server, which offers a more cost-effective solution for initial installation.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop typically involves higher setup costs compared to IBM Netezza Performance Server, which offers a more cost-effective solution for initial installation.

Oracle Database Appliance

4.0 out of 5

Oracle Database Appliance

4.0 out of 5

IBM Netezza Performance Server excels in high-speed analytics and minimal maintenance. In comparison, Oracle Database Appliance offers built-in analytics and easy deployment. Netezza appeals to large data needs, while Oracle attracts those seeking integrated backup solutions optimized for Oracle environments.

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Oracle Database Appliance Report

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server's setup cost is generally lower, while Oracle Database Appliance is noted for having a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server's setup cost is generally lower, while Oracle Database Appliance is noted for having a higher initial investment.

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric

4.0 out of 5

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric

4.0 out of 5

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric offers multi-tenancy, robust security, and high availability, excelling in distributed computing and POSIX compliance. In comparison, IBM Netezza Performance Server emphasizes speed and efficient processing, ideal for large data sets with quick query execution.

Pricing

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric offers a straightforward setup at competitive pricing, while IBM Netezza Performance Server can involve higher initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric offers a straightforward setup at competitive pricing, while IBM Netezza Performance Server can involve higher initial setup costs.

Spark SQL

3.9 out of 5

Spark SQL

3.9 out of 5

IBM Netezza Performance Server excels in query speed through proprietary hardware, making it ideal for specific analytics workloads. In comparison, Spark SQL offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness through open-source and cloud support, favoring those prioritizing scalability and budget-conscious solutions.

Pricing

IBM Netezza Performance Server typically incurs higher setup costs, while Spark SQL often offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in their financial entry points.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 3 more products

Related categories

Data Warehouse

Hadoop

Customer Experience Management