Amazon EMR and IBM Netezza Performance Server compete in data processing. Amazon EMR holds an advantage with cost-effective scalability and integration with AWS services, making it appealing for cloud solutions, whereas IBM Netezza excels in high-speed analytics for structured data, despite higher costs.
Features: Amazon EMR provides scalable cloud-based data processing, efficient integration with Hadoop clusters, and sophisticated AWS API compatibility. IBM Netezza offers pre-built appliance efficiency, fast SQL query handling, and built-in analytics capabilities tailored for structured data.
Room for Improvement: Amazon EMR could improve management simplicity, onboarding for complex tasks, and feature compatibility. IBM Netezza should enhance scalability, support for simultaneous queries, and cloud integration, focusing on administrative tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EMR is effectively deployed on public cloud systems with 24/7 support, providing fast responses. IBM Netezza, often used in on-premises or hybrid setups, experiences inconsistent support, with Amazon's service generally perceived as more reliable.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon EMR uses a flexible, usage-based pricing model that requires careful management to avoid high costs, while IBM Netezza demands higher initial investments. Both systems deliver significant ROI by efficiently processing large data volumes, with Amazon EMR offering dynamic cost optimization and IBM Netezza leveraging performance benefits for structured data.
We get all call support, screen sharing support, and immediate support, so there are no problems.
They help with billing, cost determination, IAM properties, security compliance, and deployment and migration activities.
Technical support is very costly for me, accounting for twenty-five to thirty percent of the product cost.
Scalability can be provisioned using the auto-scaling feature, EC2 instances, on-demand instances, and storage locations like block storage, S3, or file storage.
It is provided as a pre-configured box, and scaling is not an option.
Regular updates, patch installations, monitoring, logging, alerting, and disaster recovery activities are crucial for maintaining stability.
The cost factor differs significantly. When you run Spark application on EKS, you run at the pod level, so you can control the compute cost. But in Amazon EMR, when you have to run one application, you have to launch the entire EC2.
There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB.
The cloud version is only available in AWS, and in the Middle East, it is not well-developed in the Azure environment.
Costs are involved based on cluster resources, data volumes, EC2 instances, instance sizes, Kubernetes, Docker services, storage, and data transfers.
Amazon EMR helps in scalability, real-time and batch processing of data, handling efficient data sources, and managing data lakes, data stores, and data marts on file systems and in S3 buckets.
Amazon EMR provides out-of-the-box functionality because we can deploy and get Spark functionality over Hadoop.
It operates as a high-speed data warehouse, which is essential for handling big data.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon EMR | 12.8% |
| IBM Netezza Performance Server | 1.9% |
| Other | 85.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
IBM Netezza Performance Server offers high performance, scalability, and minimal maintenance. It seamlessly integrates SQL for efficient data processing, making it ideal for enterprise data warehousing needs.
IBM Netezza Performance Server is known for its outstanding data processing capabilities. Its integration of FPGA technology, compression techniques, and partitioning optimizes query execution and scalability. Users appreciate its appliance-like architecture for straightforward deployment, distributed querying, and high availability, significantly boosting operations and analytics capabilities. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in handling high concurrency, real-time integration, and specific big data functionalities. Enhancements in database management tools, XML integration, and cloud options are commonly desired, along with better marketing and community engagement.
What are the key features of IBM Netezza Performance Server?Industries rely on IBM Netezza Performance Server for robust data warehousing solutions, particularly in sectors requiring intensive data analysis such as finance, retail, and telecommunications. Organizations use it to power business intelligence tools like Business Objects and MicroStrategy for customer analytics, establishing data marts and staging tables to efficiently manage and update enterprise data. With the capacity to handle large volumes of compressed and uncompressed data, it finds numerous applications in on-premises setups, powering data mining and reporting with high reliability and efficiency.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
