We performed a comparison between IBM Netezza Performance Server and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The most valuable features of the IBM Netezza Performance Server are the NPS server because of the reduced maintenance and overall good performance."
"The performance is great, we are able to query our data in one operation."
"Teradata has good performance, the response times are very fast. Overall the solution is easy to use. When we do the transformation, we have all of our staging and aggregation data available."
"The most valuable features of Teradata are that it is a massively parallel platform and I can receive a lot of data and get the queries out correctly, especially if it's been appropriately designed. The native features make it very suitable for multiple large data tasks in a structured data environment. Additionally, the automation is very good."
"Teradata's most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"It's very, very fast"
"The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security."
"The flexibility in design is very good."
"There are several features of Teradata that I like. One of the most basic is the indexes. I also like that it provides lower TCO. It also has the optimizer feature which is a good feature and isn't found in other legacy systems. Parallelism is also another feature I like in Teradata because when you are running or hosting on multiple systems, you have this shared-nothing architecture that helps. Loading and unloading in Teradata are also really helpful compared to other systems."
"IBM Netezza Performance Server could improve its interface, support for big data, and APA-based connectivity should be available."
"The setup is not straightforward."
"The scalability could be better. The on-premises solution is always more complicated to scale."
"I've been using the same UI for 20 years in Teradata. It could use some updating. Adding more stability around Teradata Studio would be outstanding. Teradata Studio is a Java-based version of their tool. It's much better now, but it still has some room for improvement."
"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."
"It could use some more advanced analytics relating to structured and semi-structured data."
"The solution is stable. However, there are times when we are using large amounts of data and we can see some latency issues."
"I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."
"I would like to see more integration with many different types of data."
Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.
IBM Netezza Performance Server is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 2 reviews while Teradata is ranked 3rd in Data Warehouse with 16 reviews. IBM Netezza Performance Server is rated 8.6, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Netezza Performance Server writes "We are now able to analyze products, stores, suppliers and sales as quickly as we need". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Very fast with good database control and excellent support". IBM Netezza Performance Server is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Snowflake, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, SQL Server and IBM Db2 Warehouse on Cloud, whereas Teradata is most compared with Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, SQL Server, Vertica and Teradata IntelliFlex. See our IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Teradata report.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.