IBM MQ provides reliable message delivery, supporting integration across systems with features like security and data integrity. It's widely used in financial and healthcare sectors, offering high scalability and availability while maintaining message consistency during downtime.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM MQ | 21.0% |
| ActiveMQ | 19.8% |
| VMware Tanzu Data Solutions | 9.3% |
| Other | 49.900000000000006% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MuleSoft Anypoint Platform | 4.0 | 6.6% | 92% | 60 interviewsAdd to research |
| VMware Tanzu Data Solutions | 4.0 | 9.3% | 89% | 85 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 118 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 280 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 136 |
| Large Enterprise | 558 |
IBM MQ is known for its reliable and guaranteed message delivery, high scalability, and seamless integration with diverse systems. Users find its data integrity and robust security particularly beneficial, making it ideal for critical environments. It efficiently handles large message volumes, ensuring no data loss even during outages. Ease of use and initial setup, along with stability, are frequently noted advantages. However, users express a desire for better interfaces and enhanced cloud integration. Administration and security features are sometimes considered complex, necessitating streamlined processes and modern graphical interfaces. Expanded monitoring, competitive pricing, improved connectivity with platforms like Kafka and RabbitMQ, and seamless integration opportunities are commonly suggested areas for improvement.
What Are the Key Features of IBM MQ?IBM MQ is extensively implemented in critical industries such as finance and airlines, where reliable data exchange is essential. It supports message delivery in diverse platforms, facilitating crucial business transactions and scalable web services. Organizations in these sectors leverage its stability, high performance, and integration with both distributed and mainframe environments for consistent and reliable communication, helping to reduce the risk of data loss.
IBM MQ was previously known as WebSphere MQ.
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| SWIFT manager at Raiffeisen Bank Aval | 4.5 | We use IBM MQ for payment processing across countries in a stable production environment. It's reliable, well-documented, and secure, though accessing IBM support is challenging. Improvements could include additional features and a graphical interface. Pricing comparisons are unavailable. |
| Enterprise Technical Leader at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use IBM MQ primarily for ACE and B2B applications, and it’s been reliable, fast, and stable over the years. Though pricey, it scales well, offers solid support, and I’d rate it an eight out of ten. |
| Dev lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use IBM MQ as a reliable middleware solution for our enterprise. Its stability and resilience make it top-notch, though it needs better cloud compatibility. It effectively integrates systems, offering ROI despite lacking direct financial impact. |
| Senior Manager, MW & DB Automation at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 5.0 | I rate IBM WebSphere Application Server and MQ 10/10. I praise their superiority, high availability, and integration. Support is excellent. My only concern is WebSphere's future Java support after 2030. |
| Integration Solution Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used IBM MQ for four years and appreciate its stability, support, and security, but scaling limitations and licensing costs have led us to transition to Apache Kafka for better flexibility and cost efficiency. |
| Director, At Tiaa Senior Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used IBM MQ for about ten years, mainly for asynchronous API integrations. It's stable, scalable, and supports JMS well, though I’d like improved message rollback features. Overall, it's excellent for workflow messaging. |
| Vice President - Senior IT Audit Manager at Northern Trust Corporation | 4.5 | I primarily use IBM MQ for data transfers and configuring queues within applications. Its most valuable feature is its reliability and strong security. It's still in a research phase, so specific improvements are difficult to suggest. |
| Senior System Analyst at Thakral | 4.5 | I use IBM MQ for secure and reliable message transfers in banking, especially with SWIFT. Its stability and performance are unmatched, though the pricing could be more competitive. Despite its cost, clients often prefer it over alternatives like Kafka. |