Acunetix and GitGuardian Platform compete in the application security and secrets management categories. Acunetix holds an advantage in vulnerability scanning and report details, while GitGuardian excels in real-time secret detection and integration with development workflows.
Features: Acunetix is recognized for comprehensive vulnerability scanning, black-box and authenticated scans, and ease of setup. GitGuardian Platform offers real-time secret detection, "Dev in the loop" for rapid response, and integration with development workflows that enhance DevOps practices.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could improve licensing flexibility, executive reporting, and scan speed. GitGuardian Platform needs improvements in onboarding ease, mobile app comprehensiveness, and user management features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides deployment options like on-premises and hybrid cloud but faces complex deployment processes and support delays. GitGuardian Platform's cloud-based nature facilitates straightforward deployments, though users desire historical scan automation. Both platforms offer generally responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is seen as pricey, causing dissatisfaction over its licensing model, yet offers satisfactory ROI. GitGuardian Platform is considered cost-effective, particularly for small teams utilizing its free tier, though it can be costly for larger teams. It is praised for reducing security breaches and strong ROI.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
The technical support from Acunetix is quite good
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
GitGuardian Platform | 0.9% |
Acunetix | 2.6% |
Other | 96.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 15 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 14 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 13 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.
GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.
What features define GitGuardian?In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.